Committee on Security and Defence Ordinary meeting
10 November 2026
Inhaltsverzeichnis aktualisiert am 10. Nov. 2026
Legende
Markierungen im Transkript
- Text Aktuell abgespielter Satz
- Text Suchergebnis
- Text Redebeitrag, auf den der geöffnete Link verweist
Klicken Sie auf einen Satz, um das Video ab dieser Stelle abzuspielen. Markieren Sie Text, um ihn mit Redner, Zeitstempel und Link zu zitieren.
Weitere Optionen
Offizielle Quelle
Versatz
Versatz des Transkripts
0s
Textgröße
Exportieren
Aufzeichnung
Versionen dieses Videos
- Aufzeichnung Endgültige Version · 10. November 2026Angezeigt
- Live aufgezeichnet Live übertragen am 10. November 2026
Die Transkripte können sich von Version zu Version leicht unterscheiden.
SEDE European Parliament
Ihren Sitzungen folgen00:04 - 03:04
Redner 3
Colleagues, we have to adopt the agenda. Dear colleagues, let us proceed with the adoption of the agenda if there are no amendments, the agenda of the meeting can be adopted. I have no chair announcements. The next point is an update on the European Peace Facility, including recently adopted support measures. For this item, I welcome Dorota Dlouchy-Suliga, Head of Division for the European Peace Facility at the EEAS.
The European Peace Facility is a unique, off-budget instrument, with a financial ceiling of 17 billion for 2021 to 2027, is an important tool for the EU presence and influence all around the world. We very much welcome its resumption for Ukraine. Our institution repeatedly called on the Council to urgently resolve the deadlock over the Ukraine assistance found under the European Peace Facility, which is essential for the implementation of the EU's long-term security commitments to Ukraine. Now it's essential to make up for wasted time and to provide Ukraine with all the necessary support as a matter of urgency. But we know that the European Peace Facility is not only for Ukraine and the measures cover a wide range of countries and areas.
I would like to flag a few. For Moldova, which is highly affected by Russia's war of aggressions against Ukraine, EPF measures were instrumental in strengthening its defense capabilities. However, with an increasing number of airspace violation, is the EU ready to step up its support through this instrument to further strengthen the security of Moldova? For Lebanon, we just had an exchange of views on the EU on the new EU support mission to Lebanon. Part of the European Peace Facility equipment goes to Lebanese armed forces units operating in the south, an area that is still very volatile and will see UNIFIL withdraw.
Who carries out end-use monitoring there, and how do you make sure this equipment is not diverted? For the assistance measures to African countries, one of the concerns could be that the support provided through these measures look too fragmented and the focus is short term. Is there any reflection on this or any argument to counter this narrative? Briefly, under the operations pillar, we have several EU military missions and operations benefiting from the European Peace Facility financing. However, these missions have mandates that go well beyond 2027.
Der Rest des Transkripts ist Pro-Kunden vorbehalten
Schalten Sie mit Polyfact Pro das vollständige Transkript, den Chat und alle Analysefunktionen frei.
Das Video selbst bleibt kostenlos und vollständig verfügbar, ohne Konto.