Senate Education and Employment Legislation Committee (part 1 of 2)

10 February 2026

Senate Education and Employment Committee Australian Parliament

10:04 - 10:24
Speaker 19
Just before I kick off, just note we've got, photography in the room, and I'll just confirm that everyone's happy for that to proceed.  Thank you.  Subject to the usual rules, which are readily available.  Good morning, everyone.  I declare open this hearing of the Education and Employment Legislation Committee into the twenty twenty five, twenty six additional estimates. 
10:24 - 12:25
Speaker 20
I begin by acknowledging the traditional custodians of the land on which we all meet today and pay my respects to their elders past and present, and I extend that respect to aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people joining us today.  The committee has fixed Thursday, 02/19/2026, as the date for the return of questions...  Of answers to questions taken on notice.  The committee's proceedings today will begin with corporate and enabling services, cross portfolio, and general matters of the employment and workplace relations portfolio.  Understanding order 26, the committee must take all evidence in public session. 

This includes answers to questions on notice.  I remind witnesses that in giving evidence to the committee, they are protected by parliamentary privilege.  It is unlawful for anyone to threaten or to disadvantage a witness on account of evidence given to a committee, and such action may be treated by the senate as a contempt.  It is also a contempt to give false or misleading evidence.  The senate has endorsed the following test of relevance of questions at estimates hearings. 

Any questions going to the operations or financial positions of the departments and agencies which are seeking funds in estimates are relevant questions for the purpose of estimates hearings.  I remind officers that the senate has resolved that there are no areas in connection with the expenditure of public funds where any person has a discretion to withhold details or explanations from the parliament or its committees unless the parliament has expressly provided otherwise.  The senate has resolved also that an officer of a department of the Commonwealth shall not be asked to give opinions on matters of policy and shall be given reasonable opportunities to refer questions asked of the officer to superior officers or to a minister.  This resolution does not preclude questions asking for explanations of policies or factual questions about when and how policies were adopted.  Witnesses are reminded of the senate order specifying the process by which a claim of public interest immunity should be raised, and I incorporate the public interest immunity statement into the hand side. 

The rest of the transcript is for Pro customers

Unlock the full transcript, chat, and every analysis feature with Polyfact Pro.

The video itself stays free to watch, in full, no account needed.

Start a free trial