Name: Senate Education and Employment Legislation Committee (part 1 of 2)
Uploaded: 2026-06-02T22:48:00+00:00

12:23 - 14:52

Speaker 20

Open this hearing of the Education and Employment Legislation Committee into the twenty twenty six, twenty seven budget estimates. I begin by acknowledging the traditional custodians of the land on which we meet today and pay my respects to their elders past and present, and I extend that respect to aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people here today. The committee has fixed Friday, 07/24/2020 as the date for the return of answers to questions taken on notice. The committee's proceedings today will begin with outcome one, employment of the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations. Understanding order 26, the committee must take all evidence in public session, and this includes answers questions on notice.

I remind all witnesses that in giving evidence to the committee, they are protected by parliamentary privilege. It is unlawful for anyone to threaten or disadvantage a witness on account of evidence given to a committee, and such action may be treated by the senate as a contempt. It is also a contempt to give false or misleading evidence. The senate has endorsed the following test of relevance of questions at estimates hearings. Any questions going to the operations or financial positions of the departments and agencies which are seeking funds estimates are relevant questions for the purpose of estimates hearings.

I remind officers that the senate has resolved that there are no areas in connection with the expenditure of public funds where any person has a discretion to withhold details or explanations from the parliament or its committees unless the parliament has expressly provided otherwise. The senate has resolved also that an officer of a department of the commonwealth shall not be asked to give opinions on matters of policy and shall be given reasonable opportunity to refer questions asked of the officer to superior officers or to a minister. This resolution does not preclude questions asking for explanations of policies or factual questions about when and how policies were adopted. Witnesses are reminded of the senate order specifying the process by which a claim of public interest immunity should be raised, and I incorporate public interest immunity statement into the hand side. I remind senators of their obligations under the behavior code for Australian parliamentarians to treat witnesses with dignity, courtesy, fairness, and respect.

An officer called to answer a question for the first time should state their full name and the capacity in which they appear. I now welcome senator the honorable doctor Jess Walsh, minister for early childhood and youth, representing the minister for employment and workplace relations. Minister, do you have an opening statement? No. I also welcome mister Simon Duggan, secretary of the department of employment and workplace relations.

The rest of the transcript is for Pro customers

Unlock the full transcript, chat, and every analysis feature with Polyfact Pro.

Start a free trial