Senate Chamber (part 2 of 2)
8 September 2026
Speaker dots
- Speakers in the chapter
- Colour: political group
- Grey: no group
Tap or click a chapter's dots to see names and groups.
Contents updated on 9 Sept 2026
Legend
Transcript markers
- text Sentence being played
- text Search result
- text Intervention cited by the link you opened
Click a sentence to play the video from that moment. Select text to quote it with the speaker, timestamp and link.
More options
Senate Australian Parliament
00:00 - 03:20
Speaker 1
I really do want to thank you, Senator, for bringing this important issue to the Senate today and your advocacy in bringing a collective attention to this decision. As a Senator for Western Australia, I've heard from constituents who are deeply concerned about the health impacts of paraquat. In particular, they have raised serious concerns about the growing body of evidence linking exposure of paraquat to Parkinson's disease. I would also like to acknowledge the important work of Parkinson's Australia. They have been raising the alarm and have highlighted the reviews, submissions, and advocacy that is pointing to a mounting body of scientific evidence about the impacts of paraquat on human health.
Today's motion comes in the context of the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority conclusion of its long-term review of paraquat. And I recognize that some people have welcomed the stronger controls announced as part of the review, including increased personal protective equipment requirements and the restriction of the use of backpack sprayers, including requirements relating to enclosed cabs. But I have also heard from many people who are disappointed and deeply concerned that these measures do not go far enough. Their view is that, given the risks associated with this chemical, paraquat should be banned altogether. The campaign to ban paraquat in Australia is gaining momentum, and we must recognize this.
More than 20,000 people have signed a petition calling for a ban. More than 70 countries around the world have banned paraquat, including the United Kingdom, Canada, China, and the Netherlands. And despite this evidence, here in Australia, paraquat continues to be used every day. Australia's regulatory body has said that exposure to this chemical through approved uses does not increase the risk of neurotoxicity, including Parkinson's disease. I have seen social media reporting that Australia's neurologists feel that their expertise and evidence in this review was not fully considered.
I am concerned that Australia is out of step with the rest of the world on this one. I think our regulatory model should be precautionary, where a chemical is deemed hazardous unless it is proven to be safe. There is no proof that paraquat, even with precautions, is safe. We in the Greens believe it warrants further scrutiny, proper scrutiny, the kind of scrutiny which is, quite frankly, the job of this body. That is what the Senate is for.
The rest of the transcript is for Pro customers
Unlock the full transcript, chat, and every analysis feature with Polyfact Pro.
The video itself stays free to watch, in full, no account needed.
Start a free trial