Senate Appropriations Committee
Derzeit keine Kapitel verfügbar
Legende
Markierungen im Transkript
- Text Aktuell abgespielter Satz
- Text Suchergebnis
- Text Redebeitrag, auf den der geöffnete Link verweist
Klicken Sie auf einen Satz, um das Video ab dieser Stelle abzuspielen. Markieren Sie Text, um ihn mit Redner, Zeitstempel und Link zu zitieren.
Weitere Optionen
Senate Appropriations Committee California State Senate
Ihren Sitzungen folgenRedner 1
Are there any witnesses who like to testify in opposition to SB eight seventy? Bringing it back to committee. No comments or questions. This bill is a suspense file candidate. Without objection, SB eight seventy will move to the suspense file.
We will now move to the second item on file, SB eight seventy two. We'll have invite senator McNerney to the podium to tell us about SB eight seventy two, which is a suspense file candidate. Welcome, senator McNerney. The floor is yours.
Redner 12
Good morning, chair Cervantes, vice chair Ciotto, and distinguished members of the committee. I'm here to present eight seventy two, which is a water bill, and I'm here to present instead of just letting it go through suspense because of how important water is to California and California's future and California's past. Water is basically a human right, and without water, California would be a much reduced state and a much reduced economy. This and this in this bill involves two entities, the state water project, which are the canals bringing water to 27,000,000 Californians. Two thirds of Californians depend on water from the State Water Project.
Redner 4
And also, the levees that protect the delta from failure and from seawater seepage. So let me talk a little bit about the levees first, and I'll get to the financial part of this a little bit later. The levees now have about a thousand miles of levees, and the US Army Corps of Engineers, they do not satisfy safety standards of the US Army Corps of Engineers. Many of the levees were built in the eighteen hundreds, and if the levees fail, it will risk lives, property, and $22,000,000,000 in state assets. Moving over to the canals, state water project.
The canals have been brought water to, again, to 27,000,000 Californians, but they're now suffering severe subsidence. And the subsidence is making the water more difficult to transport. Eventually, think by 2040, the sub the the canals will be only 20% effective of they are today. So this is a real threat to California's future. So both of these items, the, the levees and the and the canals, I think, are extremely important to our to our state.
I misspoke. Subsidence could reduce carrying capacity by 87%. So, what the state agencies estimate that repairs on the canals and levies will cost $3,000,000,000 per year for the next twenty years. So this is not a cheap project. SBA 78 protects California's primary water delivery system by creating a fund that, upon appropriation, will direct $300,000,000 a year annually for the twenty years for the levees and the canal's repairs.
The interesting thing is that the fund can accept monies from different sources, including the general funds, special funds, GGR funds, and bond funds. So, we want this to be opened up. It's extremely important to all of California, and we need to be able to accept funds from all different possibilities. Without investment, we risk catastrophic failure, floods, loss of assets, and increased water rates to all of Californians. With me today, I have Morgan Snyder from the Restore the Delta, Morgan, and Jennifer Pierre from State Water Contractors.
Redner 5
Okay. Chair Cervantes and members of the committee, my name is Morgan Snyder, and I am the Director of Policy and Programs for Restore the Delta. Thank you for allowing me to provide comments today on s b eight seventy two. The bill establishes a critical and timely investment both both for the Delta and California drinking water supply. Investing today protects billions of dollars in state assets and millions of lives across California.
There are currently 1,100 miles of levees weaving throughout a mosaic of islands in the Delta. These islands and waterways are home to 4,000,000 Delta County residents, Delta agriculture, commercial fishing, recreation, and tourism industries, tribal cultural resources, and one of the most diverse ecosystems on the West Coast Of The Americas. Delta levees are foundational in protecting these communities and economies from flood risk. The Delta Levees were constructed in the late eighteen hundreds, early nineteen hundreds, as senator McNerney pointed out, and have not been upgraded in over a century. In fact, many of these levees don't meet the US Army Corps of Engineers standard.
Redner 10
As climate change impacts weathered patterns, Delta levees are coming under new stressors from extreme precipitation events, increasing the risk of a breach or a boil, which would threaten human lives, property, infrastructure, and drinking water supplies across California. Repair and maintenance of Delta Levees are currently funded through a combination of state, local, and federal funding streams, but often fall on private landholders who do not have the means to invest in the upgrades and maintenance needed to bring the Delta Levees into the twenty first century. The Delta Stewardship Council has already done the research on when investments are needed, developing a tiered risk based approach for investment known as the Delta Levy Investment Strategy. However, and critically, this strategy lacks prioritization and funding. SB eight seventy two takes an important step to identify and allocate funding resources for this critical investment in the Delta levies.
Redner 5
This proactive investment of a 150,000,000 over twenty years would protect upwards of 22,000,000,000 in state assets and save the state billions more on emergency funding to support the fallout of levee failures. The total estimated need for levee upgrades is approximately $3,000,000,000, and over twenty years, this bill would make a significant progress in making our state more climate resilient, protecting water supply for 27,000,000 Californians, and protecting lives, ecosystems, and economies in the Delta. Restore the Delta believes that this bill embodies the coequal goals outlined in the 2009 Delta Reform Act, protecting and restoring the Delta as a place and ensuring reliable drinking water to Southern California. I want to thank Senator McNerney for spearheading this very important legislation and urge the committee, an I vote today. Thank you so much.
Redner 7
chair and committee. My name is Jennifer Pierre. I'm the general manager for the state water contractors. Together, our public water agencies deliver water to 27,000,000 Californians in Solano, Napa, Santa Clara, Alameda, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Kings, Kern, Ventura, Los Angeles, Riverside and San Diego Counties. Oh, I missed orange.
There, too. Two thirds of every Californian gets about 30% of their water from the State Project. For the last sixty years, the State Water Project's water has fueled the growth of California's population and economy and supports a GDP of $2,300,000,000,000 Investment in the State Water Project is an investment in the state. Since the sixties, the population has doubled in Southern California, nearly tripled in the Central Coast and Bay Area, and more than tripled in the San Joaquin Valley, all of whom rely on clean, affordable water from the State Water Project. The State Water Project itself supports an economy that provides 8,700,000 full time jobs, contains 800,000 businesses and employs 160,000 farmers.
It plays a critical role in California's agricultural economy, supplying water to 750,000 acres of farmland that together produce $19,000,000,000 in crops per year. Given the scale and statewide importance of the State Water Project, protecting its infrastructure is essential to maintaining water reliability and affordability. The aqueducts that move water through the state have subsided largely due to groundwater pumping that was unregulated until 2014 when the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act was enacted. While SGMA will ensure that future damages are mitigated, historical damages, if not repaired, will eventually result in the complete cessation of state water project deliveries. And the cost and risk to California is high.
Redner 13
DWR estimates $3,000,000,000 just for the state water project. Our ability to adapt to climate change and be resilient is our ability to move and store water when it's wet for use when it's dry. A functioning delivery system is critical to that goal. Additionally, a fully functional state water project provides significant opportunity to support the electrification of the grid because it can and is operated to increase or decrease significant loads and produce hydroelectric power. California's water infrastructure is interconnected.
Redner 7
All of its components, whether it be delta levees or the state water project canals, must be functional to ensure clean, affordable water delivery continues. Last month, the federal government committed $540,000,000 for the federally owned canals, and we urge an I vote on SB eight seventy two to ensure the state is also contributing to our critical water infrastructure. Thank you.
Redner 1
Thank you. Are there any additional witnesses in the room who would like to testify in support to SB eight seventy two? Please approach.
Redner 8
Good morning, chair and members. Thank you. Danny Merkley with the Guaco Group on behalf of Kern County Water Agency and San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District in support.
Redner 2
Good morning. Julia Hall with the Association of California Water Agencies in support.
Redner 6
Good morning. Adam Quinones, California Advocates, on behalf of Mesa Water District, Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency, and San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District, in support.
Redner 9
Good morning. Beth Olasso, on behalf of Inland Empire Utilities Agency and the Municipal Water District of Orange County, in support. Thank you.
Redner 2
Erin Gilbert for the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California in support.
Redner 3
Good morning, Madam Chair, members. Glenn Farrell with GF Advocacy on behalf of the Southern California Water Coalition, the San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency, and the Crescenta Valley Water District, all in strong support.
Redner 1
Good morning. Dawn Kepke, on behalf of the California Council for Environmental and Economic Balance, in support.
Redner 9
Jack Worsen from Nossman, on behalf of the Santa Clara Valley Water District, in support.
Redner 12
-Karen Lang on behalf of the Delta Counties Coalition, which is the five counties ringing the Delta, Contra Costa, Solano, San Joaquin, Sacramento, and Yolo in support. Thank you.
Redner 11
-Kyle Griffith on behalf of California's Water Security, representing a coalition of, business, labor, and local governments in support. Thank you.
Redner 1
Thank you. Are there any individuals wishing to testify in opposition to SB eight seventy two? Seeing none, the Department of Finance is not with us today, so we will bring this back to the committee. Vice Chair, Zarto.
Redner 3
Thank you very much. You know, appropriations today, we're just putting in suspense. The vote to move this along comes at the end of next week, I believe it is. And that's where we determine what money we're going to be spending. This project is one of those projects in in my estimation that is not a choice.
We have to spend the money because the cost, if we don't do it today, are going to be multiplied over time. And some of that will never get back if we don't take action. So these are the comments we made in original hearing. I don't hear anybody not supporting it. But, you know, we certainly will be taking it in, you know, the gravity of what this is into consideration for the final appropriations drop.
Thank you.
Redner 2
Thank you, Madam Chair. Just want to, as a representative for much of the rest of the Delta, in addition to Senator McNerney, to say thank you for his leadership and to the unusual coalition that's brought this proposal forward. Both are incredibly necessary for the health of the Delta and the community, but also the whole state, as has been said, not just for the water users, and it's one of the reasons why the beneficiary pays principle is applying here, which is that if the if the state water project and the canals are are unable to provide that that larger share of the water that California depends on for its entire economy, the entire state is at is at risk, that's why this is such an important piece of legislation, and it's very important investment. Thanks, madam chair.
Redner 1
Seeing no additional comments or questions from committee members, Senator McNerney, would you like to close?
Redner 4
I would, again, I thank the committee for hearing this. You know, it brings a different coalition together, north versus south. We have enviro's versus contractors, republicans, democrats, I mean, senators and assembly members. I mean, this has really got a wide swath of support. It's critical, and I do ask for an I vote.
Thank you.
Redner 1
Thank you for being here today, senator. This bill is a suspense file candidate. Without objection, SB eight seventy two will move to the suspense file. We would now like to invite senator Archuleta to the podium to tell us about s b nine sixty two, which is suspense file candidate. Welcome, senator Archuleta.
You may begin when you are ready.
Redner 14
Madam Okay. Chair, members, I am so honored to be here to present this very, very important bill. But I'm here not to ask for funding, not to ask for your money. Isn't that ironic? Here, we're the appropriations and I'm here and not asking for money.
Why is that? Because we've tried for the last three years and we've not been able to get it passed because it's been the money. But we've discovered what the problem was. It was the authorization that we needed from the committee to take it up to the next level in the future. So that's why I'm presenting this bill, senate bill nine sixty two, to receive your authorization, not your funding.
So, again, good morning, madam chair and members. I'm here to present senate bill nine sixty two. Despite being its third year that I've introduced this bill, today is the first time that I've ever presented this bill to any committee. This bill has always passed out of policy committee on consent because the policy here is uncontroversial. Blue emergency response lights are lifesaving measure and parole officers need to access the tool.
So I'm just gonna stop for a second. We've all seen movies and TV where there's a shootout, whatever it might be, or there's a woman on the freeway, an accident, and the officer, the first responder who's there is able to get that individual, whether it's a child, a wounded officer, whatever, and put him in the vehicle and take off and head to the hospital. Red light, sirens going because time is of the essence. Well, imagine this story. Time was of the essence.
Before today, I I come to you because again, this is the third time. In July 2025, parole agent Joshua Bird was shot and killed in the line of duty. Agent Byrd was shot by a parolee who became agitated during a visit to the Oakland parole office. Immediately after the shots were fired, the parole office was shot down, was shut down, locked down. The lockdown resulted in the in the requested ambulance being unable to enter the scene or the area to provide transportation to agent Byrd.
Moreover, the parole office vehicle were not equipped with vehicle recognition lights or sirens preventing agent Byrd's colleagues from being able to quickly transport him to the ambulance staging area or to the hospital. Imagine if they would have had the vehicle, any of you, one, at least one with the lights and sirens so they can move him wounded body into that vehicle and shot right out there and taken him to the hospital. Maybe his life would have been saved. One vehicle you know, I don't know if you know this, but there are 42 parole officers across the state of California. 42 officers and not a single one has lights and sirens.
Imagine if there was one at that facility. And I'm not asking for money, but I'm gonna throw this out anyway. For even 50 vehicles across the state, a $175,000. That's what would have been saved. Imagine if one vehicle were at each station at a cost of a $175.
This officer would have been alive because somebody couldn't able to do it. But again, we just need the authorization cause I'm gonna come back next year and and we're gonna analyze what we need finally, financially to answer the call for some of these first responders. But anyway, in January 2026, just six months after the death of Adam Byrd, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation released a memo titled vehicle recognition lights. This memo describes how vehicle recognition lights are now authorized for installation on the vehicles of parole managers and supervisors. The memo itself is broad, and it does not clarify state which type of lights or lights are approved.
Redner 11
We have been told that the memo was intended to apply to amber lights, parade lights, the kind that you use in parades and public appearances. This is not what I'm talking about. What this committee will hear is from CDCR and has heard for two years now is the policy allowing for the installation of blue lights is not physically viable because CDCR and its leadership does not have the funds. This begs for the question, why is CDCR willing to pay for parade lights but not lights that are proven to be life saving? My office has been working with CDCR, the Department of Finance, and this committee to request technical assistance and brainstorm cost saving amendments, which I will bring before you in the future.
Redner 14
I am committed to continuing this work and I am open to any changes the committee feels is necessary. However, I reject the idea that this bill is, on principle, too expensive for us to pass. Again, I ask for your authorization. I almost want to apologize for bringing this bill to you today because of the fact that it is not asking for funding, but just the authorization. Senate bill nine sixty two is permissive, not persuasive.
It is not unfunded mandate. And we're not asking for the unfunded mandate. It does not require installation of blue lights on any one vehicle, any one time. Senate bill nine six two is simply an authorization. It gives CDCR a tool in their toolbox.
If in the future, CDCR has the desire to install the blue lights and is able to acquire funding, able to acquire funding, they will be ready and be authorized to do so. That's the big first step I was talking about. With me to testify in support is Bernard Miller and Gavin McHugh from the California Correctional Peace Officers Association. Thank you for your time, madam chair. I'm so sorry you're taking so long, but it's very, very important to me and first responders in any way, anyone who's thinking about public safety.
And I respectfully ask for your I vote at the appropriate time.
Redner 1
Thank you. We will now move to witnesses in support. And if I could just remind our witnesses to refrain from lengthy policy discussions and keep to the fiscal aspect. Thank you.
Redner 6
Good morning, Chair Cervantes and distinguished members of the committee. Thank you for the opportunity to testify. My name is Bernard Miller. I'm the chapter president of the Parole Association with the California Correctional Parole Association of California. I've been a parole agent for twenty three years.
It's been a great career. I respectfully request the support of Senate Bill nine sixty two. Nine sixty two is fiscally responsible for permissive measure that simply authorizes the department to implement at its discretion. It's a target phased approach which doesn't mandate a 1,500 vehicles all at once. The Senate Bill two is low cost, has high discretion policy to improve the safety while maintaining fiscal control for the department.
The tragic loss of Josh Byrd, as Mr. Senator Archuleta has said, is a critical gap in public safety, critical gap in how we do our business, and addressing this gap will be the right thing to do. I just want to say thank you for your time. I believe that this is, again, a critical gap within our organization and policy, and we believe that we would love your support.
Redner 4
Thank you. Madam Chair and members, Gavin McHugh, on behalf of the California Correctional Peace Officers Association, I have nothing to add other than we respectfully request your support. Thank you.
Redner 1
Thank you. Are there any additional witnesses in the room who would like to testify in support to SB nine sixty two? Any individuals in the room who would like to testify in opposition to SB nine sixty two? Seeing none, we will move it to the committee for any questions or comments. Seeing none, senator Archuleta, would you like to close?
Redner 14
Thank you, madam chair and members. I am, again, so honored to present this because this is going to save lives in the future. So when I come back to you next couple of years, each and every time, we will analyze what funding will take, and I think we're gonna be able to work together and to serve and represent these proud men and women in the pro department. And I thank you for your time. And, ask for your I vote in the future and appropriate time.
Thank you.
Redner 1
Thank you for being here today, senator. This bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. SB nine sixty two will move to the suspense file. Moving back to file order.
Redner 1
will move to senate bill nine fifty. Weber Pearson, senator Richardson will be presenting on behalf of doctor Weber Pearson.
Good morning, Madam Chair and members of this committee. Today, I will be presenting SB nine fifty on behalf of Senator Weber Pearson. However, I'm also a coauthor and strongly believe in this bill. This bill would ensure timely access to FDA approved medically necessary treatments for Californians with early onset of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's disease is a progressive, irreversible, and neurological condition that damages brain cells and leads to cognitive decline.
Redner 16
Medicare, Medi Cal, and CalPERS provide coverage for treatments to manage symptoms. However, these are inconsistent for those who are provided private who have signed up for and retained either private or commercial insurance. The California Health Benefits Review Program, also known as CHBERP, analysis estimates a premium impact of approximately $03 per member per month, which is a considered minimal increase. Most of us, at this point, know of someone who has experienced dementia or Alzheimer's, and we know that $0.03 is nothing compared to the impact of individuals and their cognitive ability. The Department of Managed Healthcare anticipates minor and absorbable costs, and the Department of Insurance estimates very low cost, as well.
With the most recent amendments, TBIRT projects a slightly lower fiscal impact than initially estimated. And at its core, SB nine fifty clarifies and strengthens existing law to align coverage policies with the urgency of treating Alzheimer's disease while maintaining affordability and minimizing fiscal impact. Andrew Mendoza with the Alzheimer's Association joins me today to answer any technical questions. With that, I'll pause for members.
Redner 1
Thank you, Senator Richardson. Do we have witnesses in support of this measure who would like to testify for Senate Bill nine fifty?
Redner 11
Andrew Mendoza on behalf of the Alzheimer's Association, proud sponsor of SB nine fifty. No additional input on the fiscal impact of the bill, but available for technical questions as the senator said.
Redner 1
Thank you. Any additional individuals wishing to testify in support to Senate Bill nine fifty? Any individuals wishing to testify in opposition to Senate Bill nine fifty? Thank you. The Department of Finance is not with us today, so we will bring it back to the committee for any comments or questions.
Redner 7
So I do just want to note that I've been having discussions with the author. The analysis of the bill notes that any costs to require coverage of medically necessary treatments of medication for Alzheimer's disease would be minor in the near term, mainly because there are limited options at the moment. We do just want to note, should there be any breakthroughs in the near future, that would ultimately result in increased cost to the state. This bill is eligible for due pass today, but we've asked the author to consider an amendment while this bill moves through the legislative process. That would put a sunset on the bill to provide the legislature with the opportunity to reassess these benefits and the potential for increased cost in the future.
Redner 16
I respectfully ask that the chair consider still doing a due pass today, given the importance of this very critical issue. And I'm sure senator Weber Pearson will continue to work with the committee as it progresses not only through the senate, but to the assembly as well. Thank you.
Redner 1
Thank you, senator. This item is eligible for a vote today. Do we have motion on SB nine fifty? Moved no. It is moved by senator Cabaldon.
The motion is due passed to the senate floor. Please call the
Redner 2
roll. Cervantes? Aye. Cervantes, aye. Cervantes?
Aye. Cervantes, Cervantes, aye. Aye. Dally, aye. Grayson?
Redner 1
We will put that bell on call to allow others to add on. Thank you, Senator Richardson. Moving back to the suspense calendar here, we have SB888 as a suspense file candidate and senator We will begin with s b eleven twenty by, senator McNerney who has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony. Are there any witnesses present who would like to testify in support to s b eleven twenty?
Redner 17
Sarah Bridges on behalf of the California Manufacturers and Technology Association in support. Thank you.
Redner 1
Are there any individuals who would like to testify in opposition to SB eleven twenty? Do any members of the committee have any questions or comments? Seeing none. This bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. Senate Bill eleven twenty will move to the suspense file.
SB eight eighty eight is a suspense file candidate. Senator Sayarto has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony. Any individuals in the room who'd like to testify in support to SB eight eighty eight? Any individuals who'd like to testify in opposition to Senate Bill eight eighty eight.
We'll bring it back to the committee, seeing no questions or comments. This bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. Senate Bill eight eighty eight will move to the suspense file. Senate Bill nine zero four is a suspense file candidate. Senator Sayarta has waived presentation, and we will go directly to witness testimony.
Any individuals present who like to testify in support to Senate Bill nine zero four? Any individuals who like to testify in opposition to Senate Bill nine zero four? Seeing no question or comments from the committee, this bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. Senate Bill nine zero four will move to the suspense file. Senate Bill nine eighty six is a suspense file candidate.
Senator Sayarto has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony. Any individuals in the room who would like to testify in support to Senate Bill nine eighty six? Any individuals who like to testify in opposition to senate bill nine eighty six? Seeing no questions or comments from committee, this bill is a suspense file candidate.
Without objection, senate bill nine eight six will move to the suspense file. Senate Bill ten twenty nine is a suspense file candidate. Senator Sayarta has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony. Any individuals who like to testify in support to Senate Bill ten twenty nine?
Any individuals who'd like to testify in opposition to Senate Bill ten twenty nine? No questions or comments from committee. This bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. SB ten twenty nine will move to the suspense file. SB eleven eighty six is a suspense file candidate.
Senator Sayarta has weighed presentation, and we will go directly to witness testimony. Any individuals who wish to testify in support to SB eleven eighty six? Any individuals wishing to testify in opposition to SB eleven eighty six? No. See no questions or comments from committee members.
This bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. SB eleven eighty six will move to the suspense file. S b eight ninety five is a suspense file candidate. Senator Weiner has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony.
Any witnesses present who would like to testify in support to SB eight ninety five? Any individuals wishing to testify in opposition to SB eight ninety five? Bringing it back to the committee, seeing no questions or comments, this bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. SB eight ninety five will move to the suspense file. SB 10 o four is a suspense file candidate.
Senator Weiner has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony. Are there any witnesses present who would like to testify in support to SB 10 o four? Any individuals wishing to testify in opposition to SB 10 o four? Bringing it back to the committee, seeing no questions or comments.
This bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. S b 10 o four will move to the suspense file. S b eleven twenty three is a suspense file candidate. Senator Weiner has a way presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony.
Are there any individuals who would like to testify in support to SB eleven twenty three? Any individuals who would like to testify in opposition to SB eleven twenty three?
Redner 18
Good morning, Madam Chair. Chris McKaylee, on behalf of the Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce. We are respectfully opposed on policy grounds. Thank you.
Redner 17
Sarah Bridges, on behalf of the California Manufacturers and Technology Association, Thank you.
Redner 1
Thank you to our witnesses. Do any members have questions or comments on this measure? Seeing none, this bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. SB eleven twenty three will move to the suspense file. SB nine zero nine is a suspense file candidate.
Senator Smallwood Cuevas has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony. Are there any witnesses present who'd like to testify in support to SB nine zero nine? Any individuals wishing to testify in opposition to s b nine zero nine? Bringing it back to the committee for questions or comments.
Seeing none, senate bill this is a suspense file candidate without objection. S b nine zero nine will move to the suspense file. S b nine forty five is a suspense file candidate. Senator Weber Pearson has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony.
Any individuals wishing to testify in support to s b nine forty five? Any individuals wishing to testify in opposition to s b nine forty five? Bringing it back to the committee, seeing no questions or comments. This bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. S b nine forty five will move to the suspense file.
We will we have a member who joined us. We will open the row on Senate Bill nine fifty to add on.
Redner 1
Final vote, seven zero. SB ten thirty seven is a suspense file candidate. Senator Weber Pearson has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony. Any individuals wishing to testify in support to s b ten thirty seven?
Any individuals wishing to testify in opposition to s b ten thirty seven? Seeing no questions or comments from committee, this bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. SB ten thirty seven will move to the suspense file. SB nine fifty three is a suspense file candidate. Senator Nilo has waived presentation.
We will go directly to witness testimony. Any individuals who'd like to testify in support to s b nine fifty three? Any individuals wishing to testify in opposition to s b nine fifty three? Bringing it back to the committee, see no questions or comments. This bill is a suspense file candidate without objection.
SB nine fifty three will move to the suspense file. SB 10 o one is a suspense file candidate. Senator Archuleta has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony. Any individuals wishing to testify in support to SB 10 o one?
Any witnesses wishing to testify in opposition to SB 10 o one? Seeing no questions or comments from the committee, this bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. SB 10 o one will move to the suspense file. SB eleven eighty eight is a suspense file candidate. Senator Archuleta has waived presentation.
We will go directly to witness testimony. Are there any witnesses present who would like to testify in support to s b eleven eighty eight? Any individuals wishing to testify in opposition to s b eleven eighty eight? Bringing it back to the committee, seeing no questions or comments. This bill is a suspense file candidate without objection.
SB eleven eighty eight will move to the suspense file. SB 14 o seven is a suspense file candidate. Senator Archuleta has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony. Any individuals present who would like to testify in support to senate bill 14 o seven?
Any individuals present who would like to testify in opposition to s b 14 o seven? Seeing no questions or comments from the committee, this file is a suspense file candidate. Without objection, Senate Bill 14 o seven will move to the suspense file. Senate Bill nine sixty seven is a suspense file candidate. Senator Blake Spear has waived presentation.
We will go directly to witness testimony. Are there any individuals wishing to testify in support to Senate Bill nine sixty seven? Any individuals wishing to testify in opposition to s b nine sixty seven? Bringing it back to the committee, you know questions or comments. This bill is a suspense file candidate without objection.
S b nine sixty seven will move to the suspense file. S b eleven thirty five is a suspense file candidate. Senator Blakespeare has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony. Any individuals present who would like to testify in support to s b eleven thirty five?
Any individuals present who would like to testify in opposition to s b eleven thirty five? Seeing no questions or comments from the committee, this bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. S b eleven thirty five will move to the suspense file. S b eleven thirty six is a suspense file candidate. Senator Blake Spear has waived presentation.
We will go directly to witness testimony. Any individuals present who'd like to testify in support to s b eleven thirty six? Any individuals wishing to testify in opposition to SB eleven thirty six? Seeing no questions or comments from the committee on this measure, this bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. SB eleven thirty six will move to the suspense file.
S b nine eight eight is a suspense file candidate. Senator Grayson has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony. Are there any individuals present who like to testify in support to s b nine eight eight? Any individuals present who would like to testify in opposition to SB nine eighty eight?
Seeing no questions or comments from the committee on this measure, this bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. SB nine eighty eight will move to the suspense file. SB ten sixty nine is a suspense file candidate. Senator Grayson has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony.
Are there any individuals present who would like to testify in support to SB ten sixty nine?
Redner 17
Sarah Bridges on behalf of the California Manufacturers and Technology Association, in support. Thank you.
Redner 1
Are there any individuals present who would like to testify in opposition to SB ten sixty nine? Bringing it back to the committee, see no questions or comments. This bill is a suspense file candidate. SB ten sixty nine without objection, SB ten sixty nine will move to the suspense file. SB 1,000 is a suspense file candidate.
Senator Becker has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony. Any individuals present who would like to testify in support to SB 1,000? Any individuals present who like to testify in opposition to SB 1,000? Seeing no questions or comments from the committee, this bill is a suspense file candidate without objection.
SB 1,000 will move to the suspense file. SB ten twenty four is a suspense file candidate. Senator Menjivar has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony. Are there any witnesses present who would like to testify in support to SB ten twenty four?
Are there any individuals present who would like to testify in opposition to SB ten twenty four? Bringing it back to the committee. Seeing no questions or comments on this measure, this bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. SB ten twenty four will move to the suspense file. SB eleven seventy nine is a suspense file candidate.
Senator Menjivar has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony. Any individuals present who like to testify in support to s b eleven seventy nine? Any individuals wishing to testify in opposition to s b eleven seventy nine? Bringing it back to the committee.
See no questions or comments. This bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. S b eleven seventy nine will move to the suspense file. S b ten twenty five is a suspense file candidate. Senator Hurtado has waived presentation.
We will go directly to witness testimony. Are there any witnesses present who would like to testify in support to SB ten twenty five? Any individuals present who would like to testify in opposition to SB ten twenty five? Do any members of the committee have questions or comments? Seeing none, this bill is a suspense file candidate.
Without objection, SB ten twenty five will move to the suspense file. SB ten forty is a suspense file candidate. Senator Choi has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony. Are there any individuals in the room wishing to testify in support to SB ten forty?
Any individuals wishing to testify in opposition to SB ten forty? Seeing no questions or comments from the committee, this bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. S b ten forty will move to the suspense file. SB ten eighty one is a suspense file candidate. Senator Laird has waived presentation, and we will go directly to witness testimony.
Any individuals present who would like to testify in support to SB ten eighty one? Any individuals present who like to testify in opposition to s b ten eighty one? Bringing it back to the committee, seeing no questions or comments. This bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. SB ten eighty one will move to the suspense file.
SB ten ninety one is a suspense file candidate without senator Gabbiero has waived presentation, we will go directly to witness testimony. Are there any individuals wishing to testify in support to SB ten ninety one? Any individuals wishing to testify in opposition to SB ten ninety one? Seeing no questions or comments from the committee, this bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. SB ten ninety one will move to the suspense file.
SB eleven thirty one is a suspense file candidate. Senator Jones has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony. Are there any individuals present who would like to testify in support to senate bill eleven thirty one? Any individuals wishing to testify in opposition to senate bill eleven thirty one?
Bringing it back to the committee, seeing no questions or comments, this bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. SB eleven thirty one will move to the suspense file. SB eleven thirty eight is a suspense file candidate. Senator Padilla has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony.
Any individuals present who'd like to testify in support to SB eleven thirty eight?
Redner 18
Good morning, madam chair. Chris McKaylee on behalf of the Silicon Valley Clean Energy in support. Thank you.
Redner 1
Any individuals present who'd like to testify in opposition to SB eleven thirty eight? Bringing
Redner 1
back to the committee so you know questions or comments. This bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. S b eleven thirty eight will move to the suspense file. S b eleven forty six is a suspense file candidate. Senator Gonzalez has waived presentation.
We will go directly to witness testimony. Any individuals present who would like to testify in support to SB eleven forty six? Any individuals present who like to testify in opposition to s b eleven forty six? Bringing it back to the committee. See no questions or comments.
This bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. S b eleven forty six will move to the suspense file. S b twelve seventy nine is a suspense file candidate. Senator Gonzalez has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony.
Are there any individuals present who would like to testify in support to s b twelve seventy nine? Any individuals like to testify in opposition to s b twelve seventy nine? Seeing no questions or comments from the committee, this bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. S b twelve seventy nine will move to the suspense file. SB eleven fifty eight is a suspense file candidate.
Senator Stern has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony. Any individuals present who would like to testify in support to SB eleven fifty eight? Any individuals who like to testify in opposition to SB eleven fifty eight. See no questions or comments from the committee.
This bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. SB eleven fifty eight will move to the suspense file. SB fourteen oh one is a suspense file candidate. Senator Stern has waived presentation. We
Redner 1
go directly to witness testimony. Any individuals present who'd like to testify in support to SB fourteen oh one? Any individuals wishing to testify in opposition to s b 14 o one? Bringing it back to the committee, see no questions or comments. This bill is a suspense file candidate.
Without objection, s b 14 o one will move to the suspense file. S b eleven sixty two is a suspense file candidate. Senator Alvarado Gill has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony. Any individuals present who like to testify in support to s b eleven sixty two?
Any individuals present who like to testify in opposition to s b eleven sixty two? Seeing no questions or comments from the committee, this bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. S b eleven sixty two will move to the suspense file. S b twelve ninety three is a suspense file candidate. Senator Alvarado Gill has waived presentation.
We will go directly to witness testimony. Any individuals present who'd like to testify in support to s b twelve ninety three? Any individuals wishing to testify in opposition to s b twelve ninety three? See no questions or comments from the committee. This bill is a suspense file candidate without objection s b twelve ninety three will move to the suspense file.
S b thirteen thirty four is a suspense file candidate. Senator Alvarado Gill has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony. Any individuals present who like to testify in support to SB thirteen thirty four? Any individuals wishing to testify in opposition to s b thirteen thirty four?
See no questions or comments from the committee. This bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. S b thirteen thirty four will move to the suspense file. S b thirteen eighty two is a suspense file candidate. Senator Alvarado Gill has waived presentation.
We will go directly to witness testimony. Any witnesses present who would like to testify in support to s b thirteen eighty two? Any individuals wishing to testify in opposition to s b thirteen eighty two? See no questions or comments from the committee. This bill is a suspense file candidate without objection.
S b thirteen eighty two will move to the suspense file. S b thirteen ninety seven is a suspense file candidate. Senator Alvarado Gill has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony. Any individuals present who like to testify in support to s b thirteen ninety seven?
Anyone wishing to testify in opposition to s b thirteen ninety seven? Seeing no questions or comments from the committee, this bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. SB thirteen ninety seven will move to the suspense file. SB eleven seventy eight is a suspense file candidate. Senator Reyes has waived presentation.
We will go directly to witness testimony. Are there any witnesses present who like to testify in support to s b eleven seventy eight? Any individuals wishing to testify in opposition to s b eleven seventy eight? Bringing it back to the committee. Seeing no questions or comments from members, the bill is a suspense file candidate.
Without objection, SB eleven seventy eight will move to the suspense file. SB fourteen fourteen is a suspense file candidate. Senator Reyes has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony. Any individuals present who would like to testify in support to SB fourteen fourteen?
Any individuals who like to testify in opposition to s b fourteen fourteen? See no questions or comments from members. This bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. S b fourteen fourteen will move to the suspense file. S b twelve fourteen is a suspense file candidate.
Senator Ochoa Bo has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony. Any individuals present who'd like to testify in support to s b twelve fourteen? Anyone wishing to testify in opposition to s b twelve fourteen? Seeing no questions or comments from members, this bill is a suspense file candidate without objection.
S b twelve fourteen will move to the suspense file. S b twelve eighteen is a suspense file candidate. Senator Aragine has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony. Any individuals wishing to testify in support to s b twelve eighteen?
Anyone wishing to testify in opposition to s b twelve eighteen? See no questions or comments from members. This bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. S b twelve eighteen will move to the suspense file. SB twelve fifty seven is a suspense file candidate.
Senator Aragine has waived presentation, and we will go directly to witness testimony. Any individuals present who would like to testify in support to SB1257? Anyone? Please.
Redner 17
Good morning. Jessie Hernandez Reyes on behalf of the California Undocumented Higher Education Coalition in support.
Redner 1
Thank you. Any individuals present who would like to testify in opposition to SB twelve fifty seven? We will bring it back to the committee. Seeing no questions or comments, this bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. SB twelve fifty seven will move to the suspense file.
SB twelve sixty five is a suspense file candidate. Senator Richardson has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony. Do we have anyone wishing to testify in support to s b twelve sixty five? Anyone wishing to enter opposition to s b twelve sixty five?
Bringing it back to the committee, any questions or comments from members? Seeing none. This bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. SB twelve sixty five will move to the suspense file. SB twelve eighty six is a suspense file candidate.
Senator Richardson has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony. Any individuals present who would like to testify in support to SB twelve eighty six? Any individuals wishing to testify in opposition to SB twelve eighty six? Bringing it back to the committee, seeing no questions or comments, this bill is a suspense file candidate without objection.
S b twelve eighty six will move to the suspense file. SB thirteen twenty two is a suspense file candidate. Senator Richardson has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony. Any individuals present who like to testify in support to SB thirteen twenty two?
Any individuals wishing to testify in opposition to s b thirteen twenty two? See no questions or comments from committee members. This bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. SB thirteen twenty two will move to the suspense file. SB thirteen thirty seven is a suspense file candidate.
Senator Richardson has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony. Are there any witnesses present who would like to testify in support to SB thirteen thirty seven? Any individuals wishing to testify in opposition to SB thirteen thirty seven? Seeing no members having questions or comments, this bill is a suspense file candidate.
Without objection, s b thirteen thirty seven will move to the suspense file. S b thirteen forty is a pense file candidate. Senator Richardson has waived presentation, and we will go directly to witness testimony. Any individuals wishing to testify in support to SB thirteen forty? Any individual wishing to testify in opposition to SB thirteen forty?
Bringing it back to the committee, seeing no questions or comments from members, this bill is a suspense file candidate. Without objection, s b thirteen forty will move to the suspense file. S b twelve seventy six is a suspense file candidate. Senator Rubio has waived presentation. This bill will go directly will go directly to witness testimony.
Any individuals wishing to testify in support to s b twelve seventy six? Any individuals wishing to testify in opposition to s b twelve seventy six. Bringing it back to the committee, seeing no questions or comments from members, this bill is a suspense file candidate without objection. S b twelve seventy six will move to the suspense file. SB thirteen fifty eight is a suspense file candidate.
Senator Rubio has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony. Anyone wishing to testify in support to s b thirteen fifty eight? Any individuals wishing to testify in opposition to s b thirteen fifty eight? Seeing no questions or comments from members, this bill is a suspense file candidate without objection.
S b twelve fifty eight will move to the suspense file. Thirteen fifty eight. SB fourteen twelve is a suspense file candidate. Senator Rubio has waived presentation. We will go directly to witness testimony.
Any individuals wishing to testify in support to SB fourteen twelve? Any individuals wishing to testify in opposition to s b fourteen twelve? Alright. See no questions or comments from the committee. This bill is a suspense file candidate without objection.
S b fourteen twelve will move to the suspense file. I'd like to thank everyone for participating in today's hearing. We now have concluded the agenda. This meeting of the Senate Committee on Appropriations is adjourned.
Stellen Sie eine Frage zu diesem Video – ich analysiere das Transkript, um Ihnen zu antworten.