Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee
No chapters available yet
Legend
Transcript markers
- text Sentence being played
- text Search result
- text Intervention cited by the link you opened
Click a sentence to play the video from that moment. Select text to quote it with the speaker, timestamp and link.
More options
Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee California State Senate
Follow its sittingsSpeaker 3
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Cal Trans, Merced Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Agency, and the multi benefit land repurposing program have all identified the proposed conservancy area as a key remaining corridor that links the Sierra Nevada foothill to the Coast Range through this ecosystem. A conservancy will help accomplish the anticipated land use transition in an ecologically beneficial way while providing economic incentives, restoration projects, and habitat and wildlife beneficial agricultural easements, bringing more stability and opportunity to the wetlands, ranches and farms in this area that face dramatic land use conversion over the course of the next decade. Thank you for your time.
Speaker 4
Morning. I'm Mike Lines. I'm the policy director for Audubon, California, the state office of the National Audubon Society. We work to conserve birds and their habitats and create more access to nature for everyone. I'm here today to express our support and thanks for SB eleven oh eight.
The Grakon's ecological area and surrounding areas are essential parts of the Pacific Flyway, one of North America's most important migratory routes for birds. Since the 1970s, we've lost more than 3,000,000,000 birds in North America, one third of our total populations. In the century preceding that, we've lost even more. California was home to 35 to 40,000,000 waterfowl every year. Now it is closer to six to 8,000,000 ducks and geese that are able to use the habitats that remain.
Many of our shorebird populations are less than 5% of what they were historically. To conserve the species that we have left at numbers that will be sustainable, California needs to manage valuable habitats in places like the grasslands and the surrounding areas and to work collaboratively with landowners. Creating the Grasslands Ecological Area Conservancy is an idea long past due. The Grasslands Ecological Area is already home to approximately 200 species of birds each year and provides essential habitat in the valley, as both Rick and the senator have mentioned. And in that valley, we've lost 95 of our wetland habitats and our riparian areas, the most biodiverse of the terrestrial habitats in the state.
The conservancy will allow stakeholders to build on and scale up successes we've already seen in the area. The conservancy will improve conservation outcomes, expand public access and recreation opportunities where appropriate and benefit local economies. It will also lead to more cost effective conservation efforts, which are more important now than ever, and have real buy in from local residents, creating more durable conservation benefits for birds and communities. Thank you, and I respectfully ask for your I vote.
Speaker 1
Thank you both for those kind of eye opening statistics, and appreciate that. We will now take other witnesses here in support.
Speaker 6
Morning. Mark Smith, in support on behalf of the California Waterfowl Association.
Speaker 3
Chris White with the San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors. We've recently taken a position of support, and we will with a letter to follow. Thank you.
Speaker 1
Okay. We will now turn to opposition witnesses. Do we have any opposition witnesses in the room? Seeing none, do we have any opposition? Me too or comments?
No. Okay. With that, we'll turn it back over to the committee. Senator Laird.
Speaker 8
Thank you. Let me thank the author for bringing the bill forward. And as is my want, and I apologize in advance to the committee staff, there's three bills that were not mentioned in the analysis that are on point. The Sierra Conservancy bill in 2004 set up a framework. It was a very significant framework for the board membership on the idea that a majority would be state appointees and not a majority would be the local appointees.
And then, that was mirrored in the Delta Conservancy bill, which was sometime around 2009 or 2010. And then, it was mirrored a third time in Senator Padilla's attempt to do a Sultan Sea Conservancy. In reading the analysis, this bill is consistent with that, which I think has always been an important thing for the state and the administration. And for your amusement, in the Sierra Conservancy bill, I was forced to take an amendment I didn't want to take which put the resources secretary on the board. I had no idea that put me on the board for eight years later in my career.
So it turned out to be a good amendment after all. I think that this also, as the testimony indicated, is a special area and a special land. If you've had a chance to see, and I think it's a national monument, the grasslands that is in South Central South Dakota, it is amazing in a similar way, both in water right by the Mississippi River, but the wind just takes the grasses in ways that is breathtakingly beautiful. I think this is the right thing to do. I don't know if you'll have to work out some things as it moves along, but it seems to be starting in the right place.
So at the point at which we have a quorum, I will happily move this bill.
Speaker 1
Thank you, senator Laird, for that context and history and and for that statement. With that, would you like to close?
Speaker 2
Well, thank you very much, senator, for for your comments. This is a special place. And for most of the state not to realize it's even there is a it's a big shame. The reintroduction of elk into the region has really added to the biodiversity of the region and there's nothing greater than driving along Pacheco Pass and seeing them, how majestic they look off, you know, within, you feel like, touching range. This is really, I think, an important addition to our conservancy statewide.
It's somewhat unusual to have conservancies away from the coastal area, and this is one of those that makes a lot of sense. So when the time comes, Mr. Chair, I respectfully ask for your aye vote.
Speaker 1
Thank you. It is a special place. I appreciate this bill. I will be supporting it at the appropriate time. I believe this will provide a cohesive state level coordination to promote sustainable water management and secure important wildlife corridors and also boost tourism in the area.
Okay. We will wait and vote on it later. But thank you for being here.
Speaker 1
Doctor. Choi, you have SB ten twenty one. Yes. And, yeah, if you're ready to present, let's go ahead.
Speaker 9
Good morning, Chair and the members. I would like to stop by accepting the committee's amendments. I'm pleased to present the senate bill ten twenty one, which establishes a narrowly tailored program through the California Fish and Game Commission to expand access to hunting and fishing opportunities for youth facing life threatening illnesses. As is the core, SB ten twenty one provides meaningful outdoor experiences to young people and the families navigating extraordinary ordinary difficult times, life experiences. For many of these families, time is uncertain.
This bill offers an opportunity to create lasting memories through safe, structured engagement with California's natural resources. SB ten twenty one also leverages partnerships with the nonprofit organizations and experienced outdoor leaders to ensure these opportunities deliver the response deliver responsibly, ethically, and with the strong emphasis on conservation and mentorship. All activities will be conducted in accordance with the science based conservation principles under the oversight of the Fish and Game Commission and with the appropriate supervision and permitting. Allowing youth to practice in fishing and hunting under proper guidance provides children with more than just is more than just a lesson. They gain valuable perspective.
For many youth, their first hunt hunt becomes a defining moment. It connects them the natural world in a way that a few modern experiences can. It also transforms abstract ideas about the conservation and responsibility into something that is real and personal. Members, this is a measured approach that balances compassion with the stewardship while maintaining the integrity of our our wildlife management system. It is also very time sensitive.
Joining with me today is mister Tom Tamati with the bill's sponsor, Field of Dreams. Also joining me is mister Rick Travis, representing a coalition of anglers, hunters and conservationists. Gentlemen, thank you very much and whenever you are ready.
Speaker 10
Thank you for having me this morning. My name is Tom Derby. I'm the founder and CEO of the Field and Dreams, which is a nonprofit based here in Northern California. Our mission statement is to provide outdoor opportunities for special needs children, children of our fallen and terminally ill children. Through the years of doing this, we've always struggled with being able to provide these opportunities in California because of all the regulations.
We've had to go spend a phenomenal amount of money and take them to neighboring states that have such programs. You know, my goal today is to hopefully get something together with your Department of Fish and Wildlife, get a strong relationship where we can provide these opportunities for these for these families. You know, we we love our outdoors. We respect our wildlife. We wanna make sure that these children are introduced in a positive way.
We wanna make sure that the, you know, the wildlife is respected in a positive manner and most of all, it educational. But most of all, it's a hunt of a lifetime. And, you know, through the years, I've dealt with a lot of terminally ill children. A lot them are not here anymore. But at least I know that in my mind and with the crew that I have that we were able to provide a very positive experience for that, not just the terminally ill children, but but the whole family.
We've done a lot of great things. We have a lot of local landowners that are on board with this. We're just asking for the blessing for you guys to take a look at this with an open mind and get this thing passed through. Thank you.
Speaker 11
Good morning, Chair Becker and members of the committee. My name is Rick Travis. On behalf of the Angling, Hunting, and Conservation Coalition, we strongly support SB ten twenty one as amended. This compassionate measure directs the Fish and Game Commission to create a targeted program giving resident youth hunters 18 with physician certified life threatening illnesses defined as conditions that may end life within five years, the chance to fish and hunt big game, wild pigs, upland game, and migratory game birds. We wholeheartedly endorse the excellent suggested amendments.
They impose a firm 01/01/2028 deadline for program development through a transparent public process that keep full hunter education requirements in place, require the department to factor program tag allocations into, public lottery or auction numbers, authorize special hunts, add wild pigs to eligible species, provide clear definitions, and mandate a comprehensive 2032 legislative report on participation, costs, revenues, improvements, and include a five year sunset for oversight. These guardrails ensure sustainability, accountability, and responsible implementation. On a personal note, having been fighting cancer in my own family and having worked with kids fighting different types of life threatening illnesses with City of Hope, I've got to see firsthand how when we're able to get a child out on a fishing trip with some of our partners from Captain Rollo's and California Coastal Association, or out for a pheasant hunt, how this has been the only respite in a three to four year battle. It doesn't just affect the child that's going through it. It affects the family, It affects the siblings.
It affects that larger group of people, including the health care workers that come out on this. California has the most precious resources, I would argue, on the planet, and I've got to travel. It is a shame that we're not able to do what we're able to do in many other states by providing a program like this. And that's why we strongly encourage an I vote. I know there's some people that say, why would you have kids do this?
But this is one of the best examples I can show of backing the commission's both consumptive and non consumptive use of our fishing and wildlife heritage. And we urge you for an aye vote.
Speaker 1
Thank you both. We will now take other witnesses in support. See none. Do we have any witnesses in opposition here today? No, no opposition.
Me too or comments? Okay. We'll take it back to the committee. I'm here right now representing the committee. And I appreciate the work that you've done, Doctor.
Choi, with the committee staff and your passion about this. And I will be supporting this when it comes time to a vote. But for now, would you like to close?
Speaker 9
Thank you, Chair. I appreciate everyone's thoughtful discussions and the presentations as witnesses. As its core, s p ten twenty one is a bipartisan bill about providing hope and meaningful experiences for young people and the families during the time of the most difficult moments of their lives. I respectably ask everyone's eye vote.
Speaker 1
Thank you very much. Well, thank you, Doctor. Choi. We are a subcommittee right now. We will be taking a vote at the appropriate time.
Thank you both.
Speaker 1
We're going to take a brief recess. We have a number of committees going at the same time, so we're going to wait for a couple more members for our two final bills.
Speaker 12
Is that correct? Yes. K. Good. Sorry.
I just got here. Yeah. So, anyway, you may you may present your bill, sir.
Speaker 1
Thank you. As you mentioned, nine four nine, this would declare the Santa Cruz Mountains a landscape of statewide significance. Let me begin by accepting the proposed amendment on page four of the analysis, changing the word landscape to resource. The Santa Cruz Mountains hold significant ecological value as a vital hotspot for biodiversity along California's Central Coast, including San Mateo, Santa Clara, and Santa Cruz Counties. In addition to being a hotspot for biologically unique species of plants and animals, the region plays a critical role in sustaining ecological processes that support the broader landscape through carbon capture, stabilization of soils, and filtering water that feeds in some of the most critical watersheds in the state.
There are currently no statewide policies that formally recognize the distinctiveness of the Santa Cruz Mountains. This gap leaves the region vulnerable to uncoordinated management and conservation outcomes. SB nine forty nine would provide the Santa Cruz Mountains regions with the necessary designation of a unique conservation area that requires special protection. The bill defines protection as actions necessary to prevent harm or damages to persons, property, or natural, cultural, and historic resources, improve access to public open spaces areas, and actions to allow the continued use and enjoyment of property and its natural, cultural, and historic resources. By enshrining the Santa Cruz Mountains in statute as a resource of statewide significance, the natural resources agency and its boards, departments, and conservancies will be better equipped to protect, restore, and preserve the region's natural ecosystems.
I want to make a couple of final points. Nine forty nine calls out the importance of supporting working lands for grazing and managed timberlands requiring a collaborative approach that respects private property rights while enhancing the stewardship of both public agencies and private landowners. And second, the bill recognizes the Santa Cruz Mountains are the ancestral homelands of indigenous peoples and the importance of their traditional ecological knowledge and ongoing cultural connection to these lands. Here today to testify in support of the bill, Anna Marie Ruiz, the general manager of the Mid Peninsula Open Space District, and Sarah Barth, Executive Director of the Sempovirans Fund.
Speaker 12
Thank you both for being here this morning. And if you can each take two minutes. Appreciate that.
Speaker 13
Good morning. Good morning, Chair and members of the committee. I am Ana Ruiz, General Manager of the Mid Peninsula Regional Open Space District, and we are a proud co sponsor of SB nine forty nine. In the midst of the second largest metropolitan area of California within the San Francisco Bay Peninsula, lies the Santa Cruz Mountains, a critical global biodiversity hotspot, home to over three fifty rare species like the San Francisco garter snake and the Santa Cruz black salamander, along with many, many other plants and wildlife species. This range serves as a vital wildlife corridor and provides essential ecosystem services.
For over fifty years, MidPen has worked to protect and conserve these open space lands along with a host of partners. We understand that the mountain range faces increasing pressure from climate change, habitat fragmentation, and over a century of mixed levels of land management. SB nine forty nine helps to address these challenges by formally designating the Santa Cruz Mountains as a resource of statewide significance. This designation directs the Natural Resources Agency to prioritize the region's protection and restoration while fostering a collaborative approach to land management and stewardship. Our vision for this bill recognizes the vital mosaic of the landscape.
SB nine forty nine also promotes public access through trail development and ensures the sustainability of working timberlands, farmlands, and ranches. Additionally, it fosters collaboration with local tribes on ancestral land stewardship and encourages voluntary conservation on private lands through technical assistance and incentive programs and publicprivate coalitions. SB nine forty nine provides the framework necessary to coordinate conservation across county lines and diverse ownerships. I respectfully ask for a I vote to protect this essential California resource.
Speaker 14
Thank you, Chair and members of the committee. I'm Sarah Barth, Executive Director of Semper Virens Fund, a nonprofit conservation organization that has worked for one hundred and twenty five years to help protect the redwood forests and associated habitats of the Santa Cruz Mountains, and we are extremely proud to cosponsor SB nine forty nine. The Santa Cruz Mountains represent one of California's unrecognized but distinct and very special coastal mountain systems. In addition to being a biological hotspot, the region is also home to forests and coast redwoods that regulate local climate conditions through carbon capture. They stabilize soils and filter water that feeds into some of the most critical watersheds in the state, delivering clean drinking water to hundreds of thousands of Californians across Santa Clara, San Mateo and Santa Cruz Counties.
The mountains also provide recreation and public health benefit to nearby urban populations and stand as one of the last remaining large natural landscapes near Silicon Valley. SP nine forty nine establishes a unifying framework that encourages local partners, landowners and state agencies to align their actions around shared landscape scale goals. This kind of coordination is essential if we're going to improve wildfire resilience, protect water resources, and maintain habitat connectivity over the long term in the Santa Cruz Mountains. And that sort of alignment has become ever more apparent following the CZU wildfire that hit the Santa Cruz Mountains and tore through a tremendous amount of the landscape, reminding us just how vulnerable these forest lands are to climate change. The bill also supports existing statewide priorities, including 30 by 30, climate resilience, biodiversity protection, and wildlife corridor preservation.
Importantly, this bill does not place the Santa Cruz Mountains above other regions. It simply aligns the range within the existing framework already in place across California. Sempervirens Fund has always known that the Santa Cruz Mountains were a special place deserving of recognition, and this bill helps the Secretary of Natural Resources recognize it as such. I respectfully ask for your aye vote. Thank you.
Speaker 12
Thank you very much. And both of you did it in two minutes. That's awesome. Thank you. So at this time, we'll take the me tos.
Anybody who would like to express support for the bill can come up to the microphone, state your name, the organization you're with, and also your support for the bill at this time.
Speaker 5
Thank you. Good morning. Kim Delfino. I'm here on behalf of Green Foothills in support of the bill. Thank you.
Speaker 15
Good morning. Tasha Newman on behalf of Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority and Peninsula Open Space Trust in support.
Speaker 1
Good morning. Jake Schultz on behalf of the Land Trust of Santa Cruz County in support. Thank you.
Speaker 12
Good morning. Josh Gauger on behalf of the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors in support. Great. And we're going to take a real quick break to establish a quorum now that the senator from Santa Cruz is here to hopefully support his bill. And Santa
Speaker 16
Becker here. Sciarto? Here. Sciarto here. Allen?
Here. Allen here. Cabaldon? Grove? Laird?
Here. Laird here. Stern?
Speaker 12
All right. It looks like we have a quorum. So, at this time, we'll take, opposition. Are there any primary witnesses in opposition to this bill? I didn't suspect there would be.
Anybody would like to come up to the mic and offer their opposition? Short form? No? Okay, we'll bring them back to the diocese. Do we have any questions, comments?
Yes sir, go ahead.
Speaker 8
I would just thank the author for bringing this bill to Santa Cruz Mountains. Our a special area of ecological significance. If there's anybody that has not hiked or been in the Santa Cruz Mountains, you have really missed something, you should do that. This will extend that recognition. It's been particularly pronounced since the CCU fire just because for those of you that had ever been to Big Basin Park, the first real estate park that we have had, it was 97% burnt over in that fire.
For some of us, we will never live to see it the way we knew it for decades and decades. And it just makes the case for this bill. So I would move the bill.
Speaker 12
Any other comments, questions? My comment is you're talking about one of the areas California that is just gorgeous and has a lot of great purpose as open space. But there's also some ranches and things like that. And I understand some of those some of those conversations are still to be had about how this melds in with them and the definitions of various parts of this. My intention today is to lay off till we get those answers because I want to make sure everybody gets to the table.
From a fire perspective, it is really important to have a thorough understanding of who's responsible for what when we have a conservancy. And because that could be a precursor to later on down the road overgrowth and mismanagement or non management. And so with that, I'll go ahead and have you close.
Speaker 1
Yeah. Well, thank you for those comments. First, we are working with the private landowners as as you mentioned, we'll continue that. And I thank the senator from Santa Cruz for his words. Listen, designating this as a as a resource of statewide significance, which what it would do, we believe advances state policy moves us closer to 30 by 30 and protects a will help us, protect a really beautiful region with respectfully asked for an I vote.
Speaker 12
Alright. This is a do pass as amended to appropriations. Go ahead and call roll.
Speaker 12
Okay. That is 30, and it'll remain on call until the other members arrive. Thank you.
Speaker 1
We have three bills on consent. These are, file item five, s b eight nine nine by Grove, file item six, s b eight ninety three by Sarto, and file item eight, b nine seventy three by Becker. Senator Laird has made the motion. Can you please call the roll?
Speaker 1
Yes. Excellent. Let's do that. Senator Laird moves item number one, SB one one zero eight by Caballero. Please call the roll.
Speaker 16
Becker, aye. Sarto? Aye. Sarto, aye. Allen?
Aye. Allen, aye. Cabaldon, Grove, Laird? Aye. Laird I.
Stern? Four to zero.
Speaker 1
Okay. That is also four to zero. We will leave that open. We have a motion to move item number two, SB ten twenty one. Do pass as amended to appropriations.
Please call the roll. Senator Becker? This is on file item two. Vote on file item two. Do you pass amending appropriations?
I.
Speaker 16
Sierto, I. Allen? I. Allen, Cavaldin? Grove?
Laird? I. Laird, I. Stern? I.
Stern, aye. 5 to 0.
Speaker 1
Okay. That is 5 to 2. We'll leave it open. We have one remaining item, s j r 12 by senator Laird. Okay.
Chair?
Speaker 8
Yeah. And members of the committee. Senate Joint Resolution 12 is a measure opposing the federal government's proposed eleventh national outer continental shelf oil and gas leasing program. It calls for the removal of California from the proposed plan, stronger environmental review, and the opportunity for public engagement. This has nearly 50 coauthors.
It is bipartisan. There are coauthors from both parties. Under the plan proposed by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, or BOEM, 34 permits would be issued for offshore lease sales across 1,270,000,000.00 acres of federal waters, including six new potential lease sites off of California. These areas have not seen any newly executed offshore oil and gas leases since the Reagan administration due to the longstanding efforts by state and local leaders to protect our coast. We did experience a spill in 2015 off the coast of Santa Barbara that saw 140,000 gallons of crude oil spilled at the Refugio oil spill.
There have been spills and obviously the previous major one was in 1969. But it gave us a clear picture of the impact of such actions. The scope of this proposal is unprecedented, and it diverges greatly from the prior federal policy. The final leasing program that was adopted by the Biden administration refrained from proposing any California leases and issued a memorandum removing all California areas from future offshore oil and gas planning. The development of offshore oil operations and increase for fossil fuel emissions acts against our efforts to do exactly the same.
It's important to note that this battle has been going on for fifty years. And as we will likely hear from one witness who we worked together in the 1980s. And in
Speaker 8
1980s, when I was in local government, our local government adopted a ballot measure with over 80% of the vote to oppose the then proposed oil drilling, but also say that you could not have a zoning change for onshore support facilities without a vote of the people. And the Santa Cruz ballot measure also authorized city money to educate other cities and counties on what they might do if they wanted to do the same thing. When that ballot measure passed, we on the city council hired Save Our Shores and a witness you'll hear from in a moment, Dan Haefely, was the executive director of Save Our Shores at the time. That led to the 26 cities and counties that adopted this. The only one of those that still doesn't survive is the one in Santa Barbara because it had a twenty five year limit.
There are still a few counties in Southern California that don't have this, but this is what has been known as the blue wall because those ordinances are still in effect. They were very important because it wasn't an absolute ban. It actually recognized one of the few constitutional powers delegated to cities and counties, which is that of zoning. And there was actually a lawsuit after 13 of these in federal court and the federal court upheld these ordinances. It was beaten.
What's important is it basically says you have to trust the people. There might be elected officials that wish to support leasing, but everybody knows the people don't. And so, if you reserve the right to the people, then they have the appropriate say in this. At And the time, when we were doing this in the '80s, we basically said that just an increase in fuel efficiency in cars of one mile per gallon would more than offset what would be provided by any offshore oil leasing. And as a result, we have done that many times over since the mid 1980s and we have in many ways removed the need for this.
And in the last little bit, this has been tied to the war in Iran. As if, hey, we'll have more energy security if we do this. If this were successful and this resolution and its almost 50 coauthors in the legislature do not want it to be successful, if it were to be successful, it would take years and years to accomplish. The Iranian war would be ancient history by the time that happened. And by the time that happened, we will be much more successful in adding millions of more electric vehicles in The United States, lowering the demand for this.
So it is a phony argument to say that the Iran war justifies oil drilling off the California coast. And this is really necessary to protect our marine environment, our visitor serving industry. And, I think one of the little known statistics that we talked about in the 1980s was the oil rigs at that time. A single oil rig, the air emissions from it off the coast would be the equivalent of those created by 30,000 cars driving in California in a year. That is a little known impact in addition to just being in the sea lanes causing the possibility of spills and actually countering our very own direction and national leadership against climate change and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
Here today to testify in support is Dan Haefely, who I mentioned earlier. He is also in his long checkered career is a former senate staffer. I don't know if that recommends him. It probably should. And also, Ashley Blacow, on behalf of Oceana, at the appropriate time, I would respectfully request an iPhone.
Speaker 6
Thank you. Thank you, Chair and members, for your consideration of H SGR 12. As Senator Laird mentioned, the California coastline is probably the most majestic in the world. It hosts the California and Davidson's Davidson Currents, which feed a vast array of wildlife. And as senator Laird mentioned, in 1969, a disastrous oil spill from Union Oil's platform a off Santa Barbara sent 4,000,000 gallons of crude oil into the ocean, killed wildlife, choked habitats, and hammered the tourism and fishing industry, for many months.
One of the first environmental disasters that really was broadcast nationwide and really, propelled the conservation movement. Couple things that happened as a result of that. One is the passage of proposition 20 in 1972 by 55% of California voters, California Coastal Act and public access. And also, a raft of laws were passed by congress, including the National Marine Sanctuaries Act. Five separate times, in California, areas have been designated as National Marine Sanctuaries.
That includes the Channel Islands off Southern California, Chumash Heritage off Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo Counties, Monterey Bay from the Marin Headlands to Cambria and San Luis Obispo County, Greater Fairlawns from Marin County to Point Arena, and Cordell Bank to the west of Greater Fairlawns, covering 16,668 square miles totally. And as senator Laird mentioned, when he was on the Santa Cruz City Council, we did initiate an effort, to work with local governments up and down the state. There are now 27 of these local ordinances, 26 back when we were doing this work, and then Marin County came in in 2020 during the first Trump administration. And these laws did pass legal tests, and eventually, San Luis Obispo County did put up an onshore facility to the voters, who rejected it. The oil industry then referred this to the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court refused to hear the case.
So the ordinances do stand today. And, these ordinances give local governments the ability to deal with the impacts of offshore oil, give them leverage, and many of these were passed by voters overwhelmingly. So as, senator mentioned, the Trump administration has proposed leasing off California. There would be six oil lease sales beginning in 2027. There was a public comment period on this program, where 308,000 people went online and offered public comments.
Instead of reading, many of those 308,000 public comments, the Trump administration, one day later, went ahead and asked the oil industry to begin nominating areas for offshore oil development. So, it's very clear that the administration is serious about this. I think that's why this bill is so important to express the legislature's strong opposition to this federal program. So therefore, I would respectfully request your I vote on this bill. Thank you very much.
Speaker 17
Good morning, chair Becker committee members. My name is Ashley Blacow Drager, and I'm the field campaign manager for Oceana, the largest nonprofit organization dedicated solely to protecting the world's oceans. Waters off California are a globally significant epicenter of biodiversity, and they drive our coastal economies and are critically important to the people of California. More than 45 environmental protection organizations joined by over 8,000 West Coast businesses, including local California chambers of commerce, oppose expanded offshore oil and gas drilling because of the risks that it poses to California's iconic coast and ocean. National security experts say that offshore oil and gas development and the associated spills could impede our military's ability to conduct critical trainings and testings and could, compromise our military readiness efforts.
All of this is at risk from the Federal Bureau of Ocean Energy Management's draft drilling plan. The federal government did not hold even a single public hearing. That's why more than a thousand California residents from across coastal counties in the state held their own people's hearings joined by local and state representatives and leaders, California congressional delegates, tribal representatives, fishermen, and businesses to turn out to oppose this plan. The federal drilling plan also lacks sufficient environmental review and the opportunity for the public to provide thorough comments on the environmental implications. The agency has rushed this process to expedite federal approvals for new drilling leases.
We're grateful for governor Newsom and attorney general Bonta's, support to defend the California coast from expanded offshore oil and gas drilling, and we are pleased by the 47 bipartisan members of the legislature who are coauthors on this important resolution to maintain California's support for protecting our coast and opposing its inclusion in the draft drilling plan. In recognition of the Exxon Valdez oil spill, occurred on this day thirty seven years ago and for which the impacts are still being felt, I respectfully urge your I vote on SJR 12. Thank you.
Speaker 1
Thank you very much. We'll now take any witnesses in support. You know, me too. Comments,
Speaker 18
Senator? Good morning, Mr. Chair and members. Jennifer Fearing here today in support of SJR 12 on behalf of Surfrider Foundation. Also asked to convey the support for the Environmental Defense Center, Environmental Action Committee of West Marin, Save the Bay, and the Center for Environmental Health.
Thank you.
Speaker 5
Good morning. Kim Delfino here in support on the behalf of California Coastal Protection Network and Defenders of Wildlife.
Speaker 5
Good morning. Christina Skringe with the Center for Biological Diversity in strong support.
Speaker 19
Good morning. Melissa Sparks Kranz with the League of California Cities in support of SGR 12, and just really appreciate the comments from the senator about the local ordinances and local onshore regulation. Thank you.
Speaker 1
Okay. We will now turn to witnesses in opposition. Do we have any opposition witnesses here today? Seeing none, anyone else would like to come to the mic and express short form opposition? Seeing none, we'll take it back to the committee.
Any comments? Senator Allen?
Speaker 8
Just appreciate the author bringing this forward. We're all very concerned about this, and I'm happy to move the bill.
Speaker 8
Let me thank everybody that commented and thank witnesses that had to make the round trip I make every week for a brief time to testify here. That is very significant and is appreciated. And the last comment I would make is the representative from Oceana commented on public meetings. And because there was public process was limited with how this was done, I know that when we had the very first one with a few 100 people on the Santa Cruz Wharf, I said this is the start of the public process to which everybody cheered. And it was a huge turnout.
And then it was it was matched in Monterey where it was a huge turnout of hundreds of people. And I think the people on the coast are awake to this issue and they understand it and they've been fighting it for a long time. It's very important that we adopt this resolution. And I think it is significant that it does have coauthors from both parties. I would respectfully ask for an iPhone.
Speaker 1
Well, thank you senator. I'm a proud coauthor as well of this resolution and I appreciate again both the history and then us stepping forward again. Mean, this is the latest of many legislative resolutions, often unanimous resolutions since the nineteen sixty nine Santa Barbara, oil spill expressing opposition to offshore federal oil and gas leasing. You know, we know that it's not only a harm from these bills to the environment, but also tremendous economic harm to our state's coastal economy. And, the best path forward, as you alluded to, is really to continue to decarbonize our energy supply and reduce our dependence on fossil fuels.
This is an excellent time to buy an EV if you don't have one given what's happening in the world, but really view this as a expanding oil production is a false solution to the current oil supply disruption and and prices at the pump. With that, we'll move to a vote. We have a motion from Senator Allen. It is the motion is to be adopted. And please call the roll.
Speaker 16
Becker, aye. Sarto? Allen? Aye. Allen, aye.
Cobaldan? Grove? Laird? Aye. Laird, aye.
Stern?
Speaker 1
is four to zero. We will leave it on call. We'll open the roll on all items right now starting with file item one, Caballero. The motion is due pass due appropriations. Please, call the roll.
Speaker 16
File item one, the SB eleven oh eight Caballero. Motion is due pass due appropriations. Current vote is four to zero. Chair and vice chair voting aye. Cobalden Grove?
Stern? Aye. Stern, aye.
Speaker 1
Five to zero. File item two still on call. File item two, by Troy. Do pass as amended with appropriations. Please call the absent members.
Speaker 1
Oh, sir. Okay. You're on that one. That one was already five to zero. How about file seven?
Speaker 12
I'm sorry. File two was the amendment was taken? Yes. Yes. Yes.
You didn't vote on it?
Speaker 1
Got it. Yeah. As you're walking in. Yeah. File item seven.
File item seven by Becker. Do you pass as amended to appropriations? Please call the absent members.
Speaker 5
And the consent, so that's those remain open at five four to zero. And the consent calendar, let's please call the absent members on the consent calendar filings five, six, and eight.
Speaker 1
That is 5 to zero. We will keep the roll open. Thank you. So we will keep the roll open, waiting for some absent members. We're gonna announce a brief recess while we wait for other members.
We're going to open the roll on all items. We'll start with file item one, SB 11 o eight by Caballero. The motion is due past appropriations. Please call the absent members.
Speaker 1
That is six to zero. We'll keep the roll open. File name two s b ten twenty one by Choi do pass as amended to appropriations. Call the absent members.
Speaker 1
Six to zero. Now we'll turn to file in four. This is SJR 12. By Laird, the motion is to be adopted.
Speaker 1
That is five to zero. Next, we'll have file M seven SB nine forty nine by Becker. Do you pass as amended to appropriations?
Speaker 1
Five to zero. And then finally, the consent calendar. This is items five, six, and eight. Please call the absent members.
Speaker 1
Six to zero. We will keep the roll open. We will, reconvene in ten seconds. Okay. We are back in session, and we are going to open the roll on all items, starting with file item one, SB eleven oh eight by Caballero.
The motions do pass through appropriations. Please call the absent member.
Speaker 1
Seven to zero. That bill is out. Filing two s b ten twenty one by Choi. Do pass as amended to appropriations. Please call the absent member.
Speaker 1
70. That bill is out. We'll move on to file item four, s j r 12 by Laird. The motion is to be adopted. Please call the absent members.
Speaker 1
Five to one. That resolution is out. And now we'll move on to file seven, SB nine forty nine by Becker. Do pass as amended to appropriations. Please call the absent members.
Speaker 1
Five to zero. That bill is out. Now we'll have the consent calendar. File item five by Grove, six by Sciarto, eight by Becker. Please call the absent member.
Speaker 1
zero. The consent calendar is adopted. Thank you. That adjourns our hearing today of the senate committee on natural resources and water. Thank you very much.
Ask anything about this video — I analyse its transcript to answer.