Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee
No chapters available yet
Legend
Transcript markers
- text Sentence being played
- text Search result
- text Intervention cited by the link you opened
Click a sentence to play the video from that moment. Select text to quote it with the speaker, timestamp and link.
More options
Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee California State Senate
Follow its sittingsSpeaker 1
Okay. A quorum is present. We only have one bill up, SB eight thirty two by Senator Allen. He is ready. Please go ahead.
Speaker 3
Thank you, Mr. Chair. So I'm here to present SB eight thirty two, which updates the statute for the Upper Los Angeles River and Tributaries Working Group to reflect the ongoing nature of their work and adjust the membership of the working group to ensure appropriate representation. So this was an entity that was created through legislation in 2017. It creates a revitalization plan for the area's rivers and tributaries through watershed based planning.
The original revitalization plan was completed in 2020. The working group has done some good work identifying opportunities for all these different projects to restore natural habitat, increase outdoor access for nearby communities. And continues to serve an important function, monitoring the river revitalization efforts, evaluating potential needed amendments to the plan as directed by the legislature in 'twenty two. So now there are a few things that I think need to be codified in law to reflect the ongoing nature of this work. First of all, the bill would codify a requirement to meet at least once per year to evaluate report progress implementing the plan as well as proposed potential amendments to the plan.
And it also we had all these shifts to the City Council boundaries in the last redistricting process. And so now unfortunately, as a result, the working group as it stands doesn't include the LA City Council member who's got the most miles of Upper LA River in her district. It's Nithya Raman in this case. So the current working group is allowed up to 23 members, but as part of its creation, certain seats were reserved for either certain local positions or to be appointed by certain entities. So just for example, I think one seat is reserved for the director of L.
A. Bureau of Sanitation. Four seats are reserved to be appointed by the California State Senate. Three seats reserved for appointments by the City Council. So those three seats that are appointed by the council are currently all filled by members representing Riparian Council districts, and this would simply add an additional seat to the working group and and and it would specify that one that one of those seats needs to be filled by the city council member with the greatest number of LA River miles, Upper LA River miles in order to improve representation.
So, here to speak in support of the bill, we have April Bird, who's here on behalf of the Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority.
Speaker 5
Okay. Good morning, Mr. Chair and members. I'm April Bird on behalf of the Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority sponsoring SB eight thirty seven. As the Senator said, this is a pretty minor legislative update to the working group's membership and number of meetings.
The revitalization plan that the ULUR working group put together identified 300 proposed opportunities and projects with a priority on disadvantaged communities throughout neighborhoods in the Upper L. A. River Watershed. Currently, 18 of those projects are underway and being implemented. And as the senator said, the updating of the membership will ensure appropriate geographical representation.
We appreciate the senator's leadership in authoring SB eight thirty two and respectfully request your I vote on the bill. Thank you.
Speaker 1
Okay. Thank you. Any other witnesses in support? Any add ons in support? Any opposition witnesses?
Opposition? Seeing none, bring them back to the committee. Senator Laird.
Speaker 4
was a Bocanegra bill and Anthony Portantino was irritated that there weren't enough tributaries from his district so there was a follow-up bill the next year and Henry was always mad that there wasn't some tributary from his district. It might be in your district now. Important to create more tributaries? Yeah. Well, more seats.
My only question is, is you are codifying that it meets one time a year, and I think I read in the analysis that it already is supposed to meet one time a year. Is it that it's supposed to meet one time a year and it's not, and so you have to codify it to make sure they do it?
Speaker 3
That's my understanding. Yes. We we your your your point is that they are yeah. We we wanna make sure that there's just regular, you know, at least some somewhat regular meetings here. But maybe April can speak more to the issue.
Speaker 3
Because right now it says it has to be every two years, right? Yeah. And we're making it every year.
Speaker 5
Yeah, it was in a budget legislation that made it two years. Right. And so this was just updated to require one year. They've been trying to make it two years at the moment since that bill passed in 2022,
Speaker 1
Okay. So that moves the bill. Thanks for that clarification. Any other comments? Senator Stern.
Speaker 6
Yeah, thank you. As the Upper L. A. River member of this body, I'm pleased to see you carrying this measure. Would love to sign on as a co author.
We're just saving you vehicles. At the appropriate But I think it's a really good idea. I think we need Citi. I mean, we're looking at several projects in the tributaries right now under the master plan, and just as an example, you know, when you've got these really complex land use plans, right, where you got city property mixing with county property, mixing with MRCA and the whole thing, like you've got to have that puzzle work. So I think it's wise to do so.
We don't want too many cooks in the kitchen just to like overcomplicate it, but I actually think this is going to help. And, yeah, there's a lot of unused land that's just sitting there as potentially beautiful park space that still serves the flood purposes. And if we're going to get any of these bond dollars out, we've got to have this ready. So if you'll indulge me, I'll sign on and let's go.
Speaker 1
Okay. Well, I'm glad the LA members are all in alignment on this, sounds like, as opposed to the past. This sounds like a common sense measure to me. Would you like to close?
Speaker 1
Okay. Excellent. Please call the roll. Oh, yes. I would do the motion.
Thank you. Senator Laird has moved the bill and the motion is actually, I don't have the motion right here. Do pass to, Senate Appropriations. Okay. Moved by Senator Laird.
Please call the roll.
Speaker 2
Becker? Aye. Sciarto? Aye. Sarto?
Aye. Aye. Allen? Aye. Cobald?
Aye. Cabaldon I. Grove. Laird.
Speaker 1
That bill is out by a vote of six to zero. Thank you, Senator Allen. With no additional bills, this meeting of the Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee is adjourned.
Ask anything about this video — I analyse its transcript to answer.