House of Lords — sitting of 9 November 2026: transcript & video · Polyfact

Prova gratuita Scopri di più

Italy it

Lingua

Video

Italy it

Lingua

Scopri di più Accedi Prova gratuita

House of Lords

9 novembre 2026

Sommario aggiornato il 10 nov 2026

Peers put consecutive Oral Questions to Ministers on WTO reform and UK trade policy towards China, systemic failures in women’s health and endometriosis care, drought resilience and water sector regulation, safeguards against abuse of Interpol red notices, and rape myths, jury directions and victim support in serious sexual offences, with Ministers setting out current policy, safeguards and planned reforms across each area.

Layout

Layout Bilanciato Video, trascrizione e chat in parti uguali Video Player ingrandito Lettura Trascrizione allargata

Legenda

Indicatori della trascrizione

testo Frase in riproduzione
testo Risultato di ricerca
testo Intervento citato dal link che avete aperto

Cliccate su una frase per riprodurre il video da quel momento. Selezionate del testo per citarlo con oratore, orario e link.

Altre opzioni

Fonte ufficiale

Sfasamento

Sfasamento della trascrizione

0s

Dimensione del testo

Esporta

Seleziona i segmenti da esportare (Word)

0 segmenti selezionati

Oral Questions — trade, women’s health, water and justice

01:47

WTO system, UK trade policy and China

01:47

WTO reform — UK objectives and rules-based trade

01:47

CPTPP access, SMEs and restoring WTO centrality

04:10

China, level playing field and WTO enforcement

07:07

UK compliance with WTO rules and Global South concerns

09:59

Women’s pain, endometriosis and wider women’s health policy

12:02

Women’s pain — government strategy and accountability

12:02

Endometriosis diagnosis delays and measurable targets

14:08

Health inequalities, osteoporosis and professional training

16:27

Women’s health centres and chronic pain management

19:51

Water resources, drought resilience and sector regulation

22:00

Reservoir levels, farm storage and drought resilience

22:00

Leakage targets, water bill and regulatory pressure

25:43

Nature-based solutions, data centres and regional stress

28:25

Water regulation minister — leakage and smart metering

31:22

Interpol abuse and UK safeguards on red notices

33:24

Fourth Oral Question — Government baseline on Interpol abuse

33:24

Interpol safeguards — Russian misuse, BBC findings and JCHR report

36:41

Interpol abuse — UK leadership, UN action and domestic handling

40:23

Rape myths, jury directions and support for victims

44:30

Private Notice Question — mandatory jury directions on rape myths

44:30

Rape myths, judicial discretion and SLAPP concerns

48:22

Court of Appeal guidance and limits of parliamentary direction

52:50

Victim experience, delays and civil-society monitoring initiatives

55:47

Government support package for rape and sexual assault victims

59:14

Health Bill proceedings — fast‑track timetable and Secretary of State powers

01:00:52

Procedural business — fast‑track bill timetable and Health Bill committee

01:00:52

Fast-track bill timetable motion agreed

01:00:52

Health Bill — House again in committee

01:02:51

Health Bill — Secretary of State powers over ICBs (Clauses 8 and 11)

01:03:28

Lord Scriven — breadth of SoS direction powers

01:03:28

Lord Scriven — directions used to bypass Parliament

01:06:33

Lord Scriven — alternative accountability model and questions

01:10:23

Amendment 39 introduced — protect local commissioning

01:14:38

Baroness Bennett — specialised services and meaningful devolution

01:18:38

Supporting peers — outcome-based duties for ICBs

01:20:50

Baroness Coffey — arguments for strong SoS levers

01:22:35

Baroness Coffey — NHS Constitution, targets and local failure

01:25:33

Lord Patel — statutory public health consultation duty

01:27:46

Lord Hunt — democratic accountability to the Secretary of State

01:29:34

Lord Hunt — Defence of ministerial direction powers

01:30:14

Stevens of Birmingham — Clause 11, NICE exception and firing powers

01:31:58

Baroness Coffey and Stevens — Clarification of 14Z62 powers

01:36:05

Peers — Risks of over‑centralised powers and local accountability

01:37:09

Minister Merron — Clinical advice structures and Clause 8 delegation

01:42:53

Minister Merron — General power of direction and need for flexibility

01:46:27

Minister Merron — Use of directions, NICE exception and accountability

01:50:04

Minister Merron — Checks, balances and assurance against micromanagement

01:53:34

Baroness Bennett — Politicisation risk and hospital reconfiguration example

01:54:54

Lord Hunt — Democratic accountability in service reconfigurations

01:56:56

Minister Merron — Public expectations, failure powers and ICB assessments

01:57:34

Secretary of State powers – amendment withdrawn

02:00:23

Amendment 32 moved – limits on direction powers

02:04:27

Proposed safeguards – necessity, consultation, transparency

02:07:40

Chair’s formulation and Norfolk maternity accountability example

02:12:53

Opposition critique – need for reasons, tests, records

02:15:50

Opposition questions – consequences of ministerial directions

02:19:54

Minister’s response – practice on directions and devolution

02:23:29

Minister’s response – CQC findings, consultation and responsibility

02:27:09

Minister — ICB reports and regional financial oversight

02:30:22

Q&A — positive directions to improve NHS services

02:31:56

Q&A — request for NHS operational model before Report

02:33:29

Mover — concerns on ministerial directions and withdrawal of amendment

02:34:39

Health Bill — NHS provider mix and cancer priorities

02:36:43

Health Bill — public vs independent NHS provision (Clause 10)

02:36:43

Clause 10 and Amendment 33 — Baroness Bennett on public vs private provision

02:36:43

Amendment 33 — presumption in favour of public NHS provision

02:39:11

Amendments 36 and 51 — review and duty to restore public provision

02:42:48

Independent-sector defence — criticism of ‘Soviet model’ and examples

02:47:52

Clause 10 stand part — questions on ministerial power to alter provider balance

02:49:46

Clause 10 vs PSR and initial critique of Bennett amendments

02:52:22

Risks of rolling back independent provision and need for safeguards on Clause 10

02:55:05

Lord Hunt — Clause 10 and balance of public/private provision

02:59:23

Intervenant 79 — Secretary of State powers and risks of extremes

03:01:30

Baroness Coffey — Amendment 34 and patient-focused provision

03:03:17

Intervenant 89 — Social enterprises, charities and light-touch procurement

03:07:12

Intervenant 9 — Multi-sector provision and safeguarding quality

03:09:40

Intervenant 77 — Procurement design, block contracts and cost risks

03:12:30

Intervenant 66 — Patient choice, rural access and role of independent providers

03:14:43

Intervenant 66 — Critique of Clause 10 test and support for outcome-based amendments

03:19:10

Lord Kamall — Amendment 35 and redefining the test for Clause 10

03:23:07

Lord Kamall — Long-term pressures, defining ‘private’ and scale of independent provision

03:26:37

Lord Kamall — Challenge to Clause 10 and patient focus

03:28:59

Minister Merron — Government rationale for Clause 10

03:31:33

Peers’ scrutiny — Risk of privatising NHS trusts under Clause 10/11

03:35:57

Minister Merron — Rebuttal of anti-private amendments and role of ICBs

03:39:59

IVF sector add‑ons — Question on extra charges and commissioning safeguards

03:45:08

Request for written justification of Clause 10

03:47:31

Baroness Bennett — Defence of limiting for‑profit provision and system resilience

03:48:25

Committee decisions — Clause 10 and 11 agreed, amendments not moved

03:56:32

Health Bill — cancer outcomes, genomics, radiotherapy and data

03:57:37

Baroness Pidgeon — Introduction of Amendment 41 on cancer outcomes

03:57:37

Baroness Pidgeon — Cancer mandate, low-survival cancers and waiting time rights

03:58:20

Procedural move and Baroness Finlay — Case for genomics and radiotherapy amendments

04:02:17

Baroness Finlay — Systemic weaknesses in genomics and radiotherapy planning

04:05:17

Baroness Finlay — Radiotherapy capacity, access inequities and economic case

04:06:07

Support for amendments and call for a prostate cancer early detection plan

04:10:01

Further questions — High‑risk men and black participation in research

04:13:30

Impact of Brexit and need for international collaboration in cancer research

04:13:55

Amendment 217 — Clinical trials participation and system readiness

04:19:05

Baroness Ritchie — Patient perspective on personalised cancer treatment and radiotherapy

04:23:27

Lord Patel — Broader metrics for cancer outcomes and commissioning accountability

04:25:42

Lord Patel — radiotherapy bottlenecks and future technologies

04:28:40

Cancer Research UK chair — keeping cancer high on the agenda

04:33:11

Lord Tarassenko — radiotherapy evidence and need for national programme

04:34:52

Opposition front bench — urgency and inequalities in cancer care

04:38:15

Opposition questions — statutory priority, research capacity and radiotherapy

04:38:53

Opposition follow‑up — equitable access and prostate cancer screening

04:41:38

Health Minister — cancer plan, statutory duties and research priorities

04:42:31

Health Minister — international collaboration and clinical trials

04:47:35

Health Minister — cancer waiting-time standards and performance

04:49:29

Health Minister — prostate cancer early detection and TRANSFORM trial

04:51:03

Health Minister — genomic testing integration and workforce

04:53:18

Health Minister — radiotherapy duties, investment and workforce plan

04:55:12

Cancer data collection and international comparability

04:57:46

Cancer mandate concerns, amendment withdrawal and adjournment

05:00:25

Health Bill — social care duties, dementia data and continuity of provision

05:31:16

Health Bill — social care duties, National Care Service and dementia data

05:31:16

Health Bill committee — calling amendment 42

05:31:16

Support for amendments 42 and 44 — integration aim

05:34:24

Baroness Ritchie — annual dementia data report duty

05:36:48

Lord Weir — case for national dementia data and accountability

05:41:29

Lord Weir (continued) — dementia research, trials and delivery gap

05:43:51

Questions on amendment 180 — alignment with social care review

05:48:06

Support for amendments 42 and 44 — raising social care’s status

05:52:08

Section 117 after‑care and Secretary of State’s responsibility

05:56:21

Carers, dementia and acute hospital culture

06:01:00

Lord Kamall — Amendment 180: scope and funding of the National Care Service (part 1)

06:04:24

Lord Kamall — Amendment 180: impact on providers and workforce (part 2)

06:09:03

Minister Merron — existing legal framework and ‘moving parts’

06:13:00

Intervention — challenge on legislating amid ‘moving parts’

06:17:10

Minister Merron — justification for proceeding and role of Casey commission

06:17:18

Short clarification request

06:19:22

Lord Kamall — question on cross‑party engagement

06:19:25

Minister Merron — cross‑party process, funding model and dementia framework

06:19:52

Amendment on Secretary of State duty for social care withdrawn

06:26:08

Health Bill — continuity of care, eye care, pharmacies and GP access

06:27:26

Amendment 43 — Neville-Rolfe: statutory duty on continuity of care

06:27:26

Continuity of care in hospitals, maternity and system design

06:32:19

Amendment 61A and support for continuity duty — Gerada

06:36:15

Amendments 60 and 62 — eye care for people with learning disabilities

06:43:27

Finlay: clinical rationale for continuity, especially in palliative care

06:50:50

Coffey: defence of access focus and role of single patient record

06:54:52

Coffey — GP access targets and clause 42 pharmacies

06:56:06

Janke — amendments on sustaining community pharmacies

06:59:12

Pidgeon — national sight‑test contract and GP access right

07:03:09

Earl Howe — continuity of care and expanded pharmacy role

07:06:56

Minister Merron — GP access target and continuity amendment

07:13:24

Minister Merron — ICB powers and limits on pharmacy support

07:16:59

Minister Merron — sight tests, learning disability and eye care planning

07:19:45

Neville‑Rolfe — withdrawal of continuity amendment and adjournment

07:23:00

Replay

Versioni di questo video

Replay Versione definitiva · 9 novembre 2026

Visualizzata
Registrato in diretta Trasmesso in diretta il 9 novembre 2026

Le trascrizioni possono differire leggermente da una versione all'altra.

House of Lords

9 novembre 2026

lun 9 nov 2026 House of Lords

Segui le sue sedute

01:47 - 01:50

Oratore 1

First oral question, Lord Lamont of Lerwick.

01:50 - 01:56

Oratore 2

My Lords, I beg leave to ask the question standing in my name on the order paper.

01:56 - 02:34

Oratore 4

My Lords, the WTO has failed to keep pace with trading realities and must reform. The UK has communicated our vision for a WTO that is more relevant, flexible, and accessible. We are actively shaping the reform debate. Our proposals include ideal ideas to stimulate discussion on how to level the playing field in trade, such as improved transparency and disciplines on harmful trading practices and to advance more flexible arrangements among subsets of members making the WTO more responsive.

02:34 - 03:24

Oratore 2

My Lords, may I thank the minister for that very full and interesting reply. The WTO has been partially paralyzed by disputes between China and the United States and the United States withdrawing from part of its workings. Can the minister tell the House whether the interim work around measures which were led by Canada, Australia, and we participated in have helped to offset the effect of America's withdrawal from the institution? And despite what the minister said about transparency, will he confirm that if we really want to have growth in this country, in a world in which trend there is politicization of supply chains and there are tariff wars, it is extremely important that we do everything in our power to support a rules-based trading system?

Il resto della trascrizione è riservato ai clienti Pro

Sblocchi la trascrizione completa, la chat e tutte le funzionalità di analisi con Polyfact Pro.

Il video invece resta gratuito e integrale, senza account.

Inizia una prova gratuita

House of Lords

Guardi la seduta completa, trascritta in diretta

Provi gratuitamente, oppure torni il giorno 24 novembre: la trascrizione sarà pubblica.

Trascrizione in diretta, ogni oratore identificato
La biografia di ogni eletto del suo parlamento, con il relativo assistente
Avvisi sulle sue parole chiave e le sue domande a Claude o ChatGPT

Tutti i video sono gratuiti, in diretta e in replay, senza account.

Prova gratuita di 14 giorni · disdica in qualsiasi momento

Prova gratuita Scopri di più

Ha già un account? Accedi

House of Lords

Guardi la seduta completa, trascritta in diretta

Provi gratuitamente, oppure torni il giorno 24 novembre: la trascrizione sarà pubblica.

Trascrizione in diretta, ogni oratore identificato
La biografia di ogni eletto del suo parlamento, con il relativo assistente
Avvisi sulle sue parole chiave e le sue domande a Claude o ChatGPT

Tutti i video sono gratuiti, in diretta e in replay, senza account.

Prova gratuita di 14 giorni · disdica in qualsiasi momento

Prova gratuita Scopri di più

Ha già un account? Accedi

Scorciatoie da tastiera

Riproduzione

Riproduci / pausa: Spazio
Indietro / avanti di 15 s: ←→
Indietro / avanti di 10 s: JL
Schermo intero: F

Sommario e trascrizione

Capitolo precedente / successivo: PN
Cerca nella trascrizione: /
Attiva / disattiva lo scorrimento automatico: S
Copia la frase in corso come citazione: C
Mostra questa guida: ?

Scorciatoie a un tasto J, L, N, P, C, S, / e ?. Disattivatele se utilizzate un comando vocale o una tecnologia assistiva che digita lettere.

Inattive quando un campo, un pulsante o la chat ha il focus.