Lords Grand Committee
26 October 2026
Speaker dots
- Speakers in the chapter
- Colour: political group
- Grey: no group
Tap or click a chapter's dots to see names and groups.
Contents updated on 26 Oct 2026
Legend
Transcript markers
- text Sentence being played
- text Search result
- text Intervention cited by the link you opened
Click a sentence to play the video from that moment. Select text to quote it with the speaker, timestamp and link.
More options
Official source
Offset
Transcript offset
0s
Text size
Export
Live capture
Versions of this video
Transcripts may differ slightly from one version to another.
Chamber Actual start House of Lords
15:22 - 15:25
Speaker 1
Yes, absolutely.
15:25 - 15:49
Speaker 3
As you know, if there is a division in the House, we must adjourn the moment the division bells sound and resume after 10 minutes. Grand Committee on the Railways Bill. It's amendment 266, resumed debate on that.
15:49 - 16:46
Speaker 2
My Lords, since we were interrupted on account of continuing and starting a new group quite unnecessarily given the pressure of business in the phases of today, I thought it would be helpful if I gave some summary of what the debate was when we last met last Wednesday.
So, my noble friend Lord Lansley raised important questions of how the existing 2016 access regime will apply to infrastructure managers outside Great British Railways. And he left the minister with a specific question. He said, "With this amendment, all I'm looking for is the minister to say there is no further intention than to apply the existing 2016 approach to infrastructure managers other than GBR."
The rest of the transcript is for Pro customers
Unlock the full transcript, chat, and every analysis feature with Polyfact Pro.
Ask anything about this video — I analyse its transcript to answer.