House of Lords — sitting of 10 November 2026: transcript & video · Polyfact

Prova gratuita Scopri di più

Italy it

Lingua

Video

Italy it

Lingua

Scopri di più Accedi Prova gratuita

House of Lords

10 novembre 2026

Sommario aggiornato il 11 nov 2026

Peers use question time to press ministers on the zero‑emission vehicle mandate and automotive transition, neighbourhood health and community‑based care, climate adaptation and resilient land use, and the impact of interest rates and inflation on debt management and central bank independence.

Layout

Layout Bilanciato Video, trascrizione e chat in parti uguali Video Player ingrandito Lettura Trascrizione allargata

Legenda

Indicatori della trascrizione

testo Frase in riproduzione
testo Risultato di ricerca
testo Intervento citato dal link che avete aperto

Cliccate su una frase per riprodurre il video da quel momento. Selezionate del testo per citarlo con oratore, orario e link.

Altre opzioni

Fonte ufficiale

Sfasamento

Sfasamento della trascrizione

0s

Dimensione del testo

Esporta

Seleziona i segmenti da esportare (Word)

0 segmenti selezionati

Oral Questions — EV mandate, health, climate and macroeconomy

02:01

Oral questions — Zero Emission Vehicle mandate and automotive transition

02:01

Zero Emission Vehicle mandate — opening question and government review

02:01

Job protection, 2030 phase‑out date and mandate trajectory

04:48

Public charging infrastructure, equity for renters and grid capacity

06:39

Policy certainty for the automotive sector and investment confidence

10:46

Oral questions — neighbourhood health services and community‑based care

12:12

Neighbourhood health services — framework, diagnostics and workforce pressures

12:12

Seven‑day community services, winter resilience and new delivery models

17:23

Community nursing, clinical advice to ministers and pharmacy‑led vaccination

20:23

Oral questions — climate adaptation, infrastructure resilience and land use

23:19

Climate adaptation — cross‑government coordination and National Adaptation Programme

23:19

Wildfire resilience, equipment for firefighters and critical infrastructure

25:18

Climate‑resilient housing, drought management and water infrastructure

27:47

Workplace heat standards and outstanding climate commitments

30:31

Climate adaptation — land management incentives

31:43

Oral questions — interest rates, inflation, debt and central bank independence

33:57

Fourth oral question — interest rates and mortgages

33:57

Interest rates — markets, gilts and index-linked debt

35:56

Interest rates — past Tory record, QE unwind and growth

38:15

Inflation drivers — profiteering claims and MPC independence

40:31

Debt sustainability, welfare spending and Bank–Treasury roles

41:38

Courts and Tribunals Bill Committee — jury trial, offence scope and legal aid

44:21

Transition to legislative business and Courts and Tribunals Bill — Clause 1 jury election and allocation

44:21

Oral questions conclude and House resolves into Committee

44:21

Courts and Tribunals Bill Committee — jury trial context

47:01

Amendments 1 and 3 — appeal rights and good character

50:31

Amendment 1 formally proposed and juries reaffirmed

56:19

Viscount Hailsham — opposition to Clause 1 and backlog rationale

57:52

Peers: appeal rights and sentencing guidelines

01:01:56

Amendment 2 — probing Crown vs magistrates’ allocation

01:03:52

Current allocation law and impact of magistrates’ sentencing powers

01:04:58

Listing practices, judicial roles and who sets guidelines

01:06:54

Equality, public confidence and judge‑alone trials

01:10:32

Opposing clause 1 — loss of jury election right

01:13:47

Corporate law perspective — defending clause 1

01:17:25

Further criticism of clause 1 and appeal removal

01:22:06

Backlog crisis and magistrates’ capacity to absorb cases

01:25:25

Allocation guidelines and rejection of ‘good character’ preference

01:28:52

Support for clause 1 — trust in magistrates’ judgment

01:31:13

Clause 1 — Defence of magistrates’ role and competence

01:31:43

Amendment 5 — Carve‑out for speech offences from Clause 1

01:34:10

Amendment 7 — Hamwee on appeal against allocation and reputational harm

01:38:22

Q&A — Risk of added Crown Court delays under appeal right

01:43:09

Lord Marks — Principle of jury trial and critique of backlog rationale

01:44:13

Amendment 1 — Good character, reputational risk and unequal access to juries

01:47:59

Appeal against refusal of jury trial and probing Clause 2 mechanism

01:52:07

Q&A — Are magistrates’ courts being portrayed as inadequate?

01:55:44

Lord Keen — Opposing Clause 1 and demanding evidence for jury abolition

01:57:34

Opposition front bench — backlog, magistrates and key amendments

02:01:20

Minister: rationale for Clauses 1–2 and system capacity

02:05:30

Minister: Amendment 2 — allocation guidance and judicial role

02:09:18

Minister and Lord Marks: Amendments 3 & 7 — appeals against allocation

02:12:26

Minister: Amendment 1 (good character) and Amendment 5 (speech offences)

02:16:10

Lord Keen and Minister: Q&A on alleged abuse of jury election

02:19:24

Baroness Chakrabarti: closing remarks on character and withdrawal

02:20:23

Chair: formal disposal of Amendments 1–3 and call of Amendment 4

02:22:46

Courts and Tribunals Bill Committee — offence reclassification and diversion from prosecution

02:23:04

Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd: Amendment 4 — reclassification of offences

02:23:04

Chair and Lord Marks: reclassification and out-of-court resolutions

02:28:17

Lord Marks — criminalisation of school non-attendance

02:31:12

Lord Marks — Amendment 51 on diversion and out-of-court resolution

02:36:14

Support for Amendment 51 and restorative justice

02:38:56

Lord Keen — reassessment of summary offences and concerns on Amendment 51

02:40:37

Minister — rejection of reclassifying either-way offences to summary-only

02:44:34

Minister — government policy on out-of-court resolutions

02:48:48

Lord Thomas — withdrawal of Amendment 4 and reflections on diversion

02:52:39

Courts and Tribunals Bill Committee — legal aid, representation and fairness in magistrates’ courts

02:55:07

Procedural decisions on clauses 1–2 and introduction of Amendment 6

02:55:07

Support for Amendment 6 — risks from unrepresented defendants and fee disparities

02:59:13

Practitioner perspective on fixed-fee legal aid pressures

03:00:43

Low criminal legal aid pay and recruitment crisis

03:01:14

Amendments 8, 67, 75 — magistrates’ vs Crown Court legal aid thresholds

03:03:26

Defence representation as core to criminal justice efficiency

03:06:55

Magistrates’ legal aid — opposition critique and government response

03:09:16

Lord Thomas — call for simultaneous legal aid reform; amendment withdrawn

03:16:23

Courts and Tribunals Bill Committee — Clause 3 judge‑only fraud trials, defendant choice and jury safeguards

03:18:28

Amendment 9 — limiting scope of judge-only trials

03:18:28

Judge-only trials — replacing ‘public interest’ with fairness and adding safeguards

03:20:30

Support for safeguards on judge-only trials — justice over public interest

03:25:28

Lord Marks — appeal rights on judge‑alone orders

03:30:52

Baroness Hamwee and Lord Keen — ‘public interest’ vs ‘interests of justice’

03:34:12

Minister — Clause 3 safeguards and scope of judge‑alone trials

03:37:39

Minister — burden on jurors, tests applied, and appeals framework

03:41:15

Appeal bar under new section 42A and withdrawal of Amendment 9

03:46:01

Lord Marks — defendant’s option for judge‑alone trial (Amendments 12 & 13)

03:48:51

Defence‑initiated judge‑alone trials — senior judicial and crossbench support

03:51:30

Lord Carlile — case for optional judge-only trials

04:01:04

Intervention on wording and Baroness Chakrabarti’s public confidence concerns

04:05:25

Noble and learned Lord — comparative experience of judge-only trials

04:09:24

Lord Keen — opposition to limiting jury trial via halfway houses

04:11:13

Minister — Clause 3 and rejection of defendant-initiated judge-only trials

04:12:35

Lord Marks — disappointment and withdrawal of amendment; procedural disposals

04:16:19

Lord Marks — new amendments on complexity and trial length thresholds

04:17:38

Chair, Lord Carlile and others — challenge to Clause 3 principle and defence of juries

04:21:36

Lord Sentamu — Commonwealth practice, renewal of jury trial and role for single judges

04:25:16

Courts Bill — jury trial principles and judge-only options

04:30:47

Clause 3 — opposition on effectiveness and Henry VIII power

04:34:23

Opposition front bench — case against judge-only fraud trials

04:36:33

Government response — justifying Clauses 3–4 and order-making power

04:38:46

Amendment withdrawn, Clause 3 agreed, and House resumed

04:43:58

Church Appointments Bill — Second Reading and establishment

04:46:32

Church Appointments (Repeal of Discriminatory Provision) Bill — Second Reading and establishment debate

04:46:32

Church Appointments Bill — government second reading introduction

04:46:32

Supporter’s speech — backing removal of discriminatory provisions

04:55:00

Government role in bishop appointments clarified

05:00:38

Lord Wallace — historical anti‑Catholicism and tolerance

05:02:24

Lord Wallace — contemporary prejudice and interfaith role

05:05:47

Call for full secularisation of the constitution

05:08:24

Bishop of Manchester — defence of established Church and bill

05:12:57

Bishop of Manchester — detailed appointments practice and civic role

05:16:20

Lord Moylan — concerns over rushed constitutional change

05:18:52

Lord Moylan — intent of 19th‑century provisions and relevance of faith

05:21:56

Catholic peers — support for repeal of anti‑Catholic and anti‑Jewish bars

05:26:26

Lord Wolfson — historical context and personal impact

05:30:09

Lord Wolfson — constitutional principle and scope of repeal

05:34:10

Intervenor 121 — support for bill and emancipation context

05:37:21

Intervenor 120 — O’Connell, Wellington and limits on advice

05:38:20

Intervenor 119 — from contested relief to today’s completion

05:39:25

Intervenor 120 — societal shift to inclusion and church–state model

05:40:50

Intervenor 119 — political symbolism under Prime Minister Burnham

05:41:48

Lord Purvis — timing of reform and lingering discrimination

05:42:23

Lord Purvis — establishment, disestablishment and reserved clerical seats

05:45:21

Lord True — Opposition support and defence of establishment

05:48:41

Lord True — sovereign’s role, bishop appointments and delays

05:52:10

Government front bench — closing response and constitutional principle

05:55:50

Church Appointments Bill — closing remarks and cross-party support

06:00:14

Courts and Tribunals Bill Committee — Henry VIII powers and magistrates’ sentencing

06:04:30

Courts and Tribunals Bill Committee resumes — Schedule 1 and Clause 4 Henry VIII powers on non‑jury offences

06:04:30

Courts and Tribunals Bill — committee resumes and Amendment 29 moved

06:04:30

Amendment 29 — concerns over delegated powers and Henry VIII clause

06:07:35

Amendment 29 — Lord Marks on constitutional limits to judge-only expansion

06:12:46

Schedule 1 Henry VIII power — minister’s defence and withdrawal of Amendment 29

06:16:59

Courts and Tribunals Bill Committee — Clause 5: extending magistrates’ sentencing powers, capacity and delegated powers

06:20:28

Amendment 33 — Henry VIII power over magistrates’ sentencing limits

06:20:28

Linked amendments — ensuring sufficient magistrates before increasing powers

06:27:03

Clause 5 opposed — sentencing increases and delegated powers criticised

06:28:45

Baroness Jones — Opposition to Clause 5 Henry VIII powers

06:29:38

Baroness Sater — Amendments 36 and 68 on preparedness and review

06:33:25

Magistrates’ recruitment, retention and diversity concerns

06:34:17

Experienced presiding magistrates and bench diversity

06:35:29

Training, court staff capacity and commencement timetable

06:36:14

Baroness Hamwee — Support for capacity and risk concerns

06:40:01

Lord Keen — Clause 5 stand‑part challenge and constitutional issues

06:41:26

Minister — Justification for flexible extension of magistrates’ powers

06:43:57

Minister — Rebuttal on evidence, equality review and capacity planning

06:47:30

Opposition closing — Misjudgment and warning on Henry VIII mechanism

06:57:25

Procedural wrap‑up — Clause 5 agreed, House resumes and adjourns

06:59:08

Replay

Versioni di questo video

Replay Versione definitiva · 10 novembre 2026

Visualizzata
Registrato in diretta Trasmesso in diretta il 10 novembre 2026

Le trascrizioni possono differire leggermente da una versione all'altra.

House of Lords

10 novembre 2026

mar 10 nov 2026 House of Lords

Segui le sue sedute

02:01 - 02:04

Oratore 1

First oral question, Lord Woodley.

02:04 - 02:11

Oratore 3

I beg leave to ask the question standing in my name on the order paper.

02:11 - 02:51

Oratore 4

The automotive sector's future is zero emissions. The government is investing over one 7.5 billion to pounds to drive investment and safeguard jobs for the future. Tata is investing 4 billion in the UK Gigafactory with further investments from Stellantis, Nissan, Bentley, McLaren and others. We are taking a balanced approach to the transition, and we have just closed the consultation reviewing the ZEV mandate. We are working with devolved governments to publish the outcome as soon as possible.

02:51 - 03:40

Oratore 2

Could I thank the minister for that response, and could I just take the opportunity on behalf of the House to wish you a happy birthday today? How lucky, a first question. My Lords, we're less than eight weeks from the end of the year, and March 27 is the most important month in the car industry's calendar for sales. And therefore, a very urgent outcome from the ZEV mandate consultation is needed and needed now, and I hope the government's commitment to end sales of pure petrol and diesel cars by 2030 does not threaten does not threaten production jobs in the sector. Helped, of course, by reducing the EV target to below the 80% currently on the table.

Il resto della trascrizione è riservato ai clienti Pro

Sblocchi la trascrizione completa, la chat e tutte le funzionalità di analisi con Polyfact Pro.

Il video invece resta gratuito e integrale, senza account.

Inizia una prova gratuita

House of Lords

Guardi la seduta completa, trascritta in diretta

Provi gratuitamente, oppure torni il giorno 25 novembre: la trascrizione sarà pubblica.

Trascrizione in diretta, ogni oratore identificato
La biografia di ogni eletto del suo parlamento, con il relativo assistente
Avvisi sulle sue parole chiave e le sue domande a Claude o ChatGPT

Tutti i video sono gratuiti, in diretta e in replay, senza account.

Prova gratuita di 14 giorni · disdica in qualsiasi momento

Prova gratuita Scopri di più

Ha già un account? Accedi

House of Lords

Guardi la seduta completa, trascritta in diretta

Provi gratuitamente, oppure torni il giorno 25 novembre: la trascrizione sarà pubblica.

Trascrizione in diretta, ogni oratore identificato
La biografia di ogni eletto del suo parlamento, con il relativo assistente
Avvisi sulle sue parole chiave e le sue domande a Claude o ChatGPT

Tutti i video sono gratuiti, in diretta e in replay, senza account.

Prova gratuita di 14 giorni · disdica in qualsiasi momento

Prova gratuita Scopri di più

Ha già un account? Accedi

Scorciatoie da tastiera

Riproduzione

Riproduci / pausa: Spazio
Indietro / avanti di 15 s: ←→
Indietro / avanti di 10 s: JL
Schermo intero: F

Sommario e trascrizione

Capitolo precedente / successivo: PN
Cerca nella trascrizione: /
Attiva / disattiva lo scorrimento automatico: S
Copia la frase in corso come citazione: C
Mostra questa guida: ?

Scorciatoie a un tasto J, L, N, P, C, S, / e ?. Disattivatele se utilizzate un comando vocale o una tecnologia assistiva che digita lettere.

Inattive quando un campo, un pulsante o la chat ha il focus.