European Parliament

How to watch the Committee on Budgetary Control (CONT)

Every sitting is free to watch on Polyfact, live and on replay, no account needed.

Latest updates

What is said in the sittings, update by update, the latest first. Each update opens the video at the second it was said.

  1. GMT+2

    Committee on Budgetary Control Ordinary meeting

    OLAF oversight framework and complaints mechanisms

    The OLAF Supervisory Committee presents its annual report, resource constraints and proposals to revise the OLAF Regulation, then answers MEPs’ questions on investigation length, EPPO cooperation, AI and case selection, before the OLAF Controller explains her complaints mandate, statistics and procedural safeguards until the Chair closes the OLAF item.

    In this chapter

    1. Supervisory Committee annual report and OLAF Regulation reviewJonas Sjöstedt
    2. OLAF oversight: Supervisory Committee, political backing and complaintsJonas Sjöstedt

    Watch the moment

  2. GMT+2

    Committee on Budgetary Control Ordinary meeting

    OLAF 2025 annual report: presentation and MEP scrutiny

    The Chair introduces the OLAF 2025 annual report, OLAF presents its mandate, methods and key 2025 results, followed by rapporteur and political group questions on data sources, AI use, customs fraud, sanctions enforcement, RRF spending and cooperation with other EU bodies.

    In this chapter

    1. OLAF 2025 annual report: presentation and mandateJonas Sjöstedt
    2. Rapporteur questions: OLAF data use, AI and resourcesJonas Sjöstedt
    3. Political groups Q&A: OLAF Director‑GeneralJonas Sjöstedt

    Watch the moment

  3. GMT+2

    Committee on Budgetary Control Ordinary meeting CONT Committee meeting

    Single Market and Customs Programme: anti-fraud priorities and oversight

    Rapporteur Erixon introduces his control-oriented opinion on the Single Market and Customs Programme, focusing on protection of the Union’s financial interests, OLAF/ECA/EPPO cooperation, interoperable customs data and value-for-money indicators, with EPP and S&D demanding stronger digital traceability, anti-fraud enforcement, transparency to final beneficiaries and respect of CONT’s mandate before deadlines and the June vote are announced and the meeting is adjourned.

    In this chapter

    1. Single Market and Customs Programme: rapporteur’s control agendaTomáš Zdechovský
    2. Single Market and Customs: political groups’ anti-fraud, digital and oversight demandsTomáš Zdechovský

    Watch the moment

  4. GMT+2

    Committee on Budgetary Control Ordinary meeting CONT Committee meeting

    Agora EU programme: financial safeguards, scope and political concerns

    The draft opinion on the Agora EU programme is presented with emphasis on auditability, anti-fraud and rule-of-law conditionality for beneficiaries and third countries, while EPP and ECR members call for result-based funding, strong controls, transparency on recipients and warn against financing political activism, ahead of an accelerated amendment and vote schedule.

    In this chapter

    1. Agora EU programme: rapporteur’s statement on safeguards and scopeJonas Sjöstedt
    2. Agora EU: EPP and ECR on results, control and political activismKinga Kollár

    Watch the moment

  5. GMT+2

    Committee on Budgetary Control Ordinary meeting CONT Committee meeting

    Union Civil Protection Mechanism and health preparedness: budgetary control focus and group positions

    Rapporteur Sjöstedt presents amendments to strengthen financial controls and Parliament’s budgetary role in the revised Civil Protection Mechanism and health support, with EPP, S&D, ECR and Greens stressing safeguards against double funding, clear indicators, audit rights including in third countries, and value-for-money requirements, before the acting Chair confirms amendment deadlines and the June vote.

    In this chapter

    1. Union Civil Protection Mechanism/health preparedness: rapporteur’s budget-control focusAndreas Schwab
    2. Civil Protection Mechanism: EPP and S&D on safeguards and valuesTomáš Zdechovský
    3. Civil Protection Mechanism: ECR, Greens and timetableDick Erixon

    Watch the moment

  6. GMT+2

    Committee on Budgetary Control Ordinary meeting CONT Committee meeting

    NRPB/Cohesion fund 2028–2034: rapporteur’s priorities and political group reactions

    Rapporteur Heinäluoma outlines his control-focused draft opinion on the NRPB-based cohesion fund for 2028–2034, followed by EPP, ECR, Renew, Greens and Left interventions raising issues of centralisation, flexibility, rule-of-law and fundamental-rights conditionalities, corruption risks, reliance on national audit structures, and OLAF/EPPO roles, before he closes the debate and the Chair sets the amendment and vote timetable.

    In this chapter

    1. NRPB/Cohesion fund 2028–2034: rapporteur’s control prioritiesAndreas Schwab
    2. NRPB: EPP and ECR concerns on flexibility and centralisationAndreas Schwab
    3. NRPB: Renew and Greens on conditionality, corruption risks and accountabilityMichal Wiezik
    4. NRPB: Left group reservations and rapporteur’s closing and timetableJonas Sjöstedt

    Watch the moment

  7. GMT+2

    Committee on Budgetary Control Ordinary meeting CONT Committee meeting

    Opening of meeting and vote on Regulation 904/2010 opinion

    The Chair opens the CONT meeting, confirms procedural arrangements and moves to the electronic vote on the opinion amending Regulation 904/2010 on EPPO/OLAF access to VAT information, which is conducted and adopted after verification of quorum and test voting.

    In this chapter

    1. Chair’s announcements and preparation for voteAndreas Schwab
    2. Electronic vote: Regulation 904 VAT/EPPO-OLAF opinionAndreas Schwab

    Watch the moment

  8. GMT+2

    Committee on Budgetary Control Ordinary meeting

    MEPs’ questions and EDES panel responses

    Final exchange on EDES’ treatment of natural persons and affiliates, use of AI and screening tools, interaction with other EU and international bodies, handling of EU values breaches and exclusion durations, followed by procedural closure of the CONT meeting.

    In this chapter

    1. MEP questions on prevention, technology and list effectivenessKinga Kollár
    2. Panel replies on affiliates, values cases and timing
    3. EDES panel clarification and meeting closureAndreas Schwab

    Watch the moment

  9. GMT+2

    Committee on Budgetary Control Ordinary meeting

    EDES system: 10‑year review and regulatory changes

    Panel chair and Commission/OLAF present the origins, functioning and track record of EDES, then detail the 2024 Financial Regulation changes, new exclusion grounds, expedited procedures, and the planned extension to shared-management funds from 2028, including implications for OLAF/EPPO cooperation and administrative practice.

    In this chapter

    1. EDES 10‑year review: panel chair’s perspectiveTomáš Zdechovský
    2. Commission/OLAF: EDES evolution and new legal grounds
    3. EDES procedures, expedited cases and cooperation with OLAF/EPPOTomáš Zdechovský

    Watch the moment

  10. GMT+2

    Committee on Budgetary Control Ordinary meeting

    Scrutiny Working Group on NGO funding and consultancies: findings and political confrontation

    Co‑rapporteur Gotink reports on the Working Group’s inquiries into Commission use of external experts, NGO funding and major consultancy contracts, triggering a polarised debate between groups over duplication of discharge, transparency, alleged political misuse against NGOs and the need for enforceable safeguards, with both rapporteurs outlining next steps and integration into regular CONT oversight.

    In this chapter

    1. Scrutiny Working Group on NGO funding and consultancies: state of playAndreas Schwab
    2. Political debate over scrutiny of NGOs, lobbying and transparencyAndreas Schwab

    Watch the moment

  11. GMT+2

    Committee on Budgetary Control Ordinary meeting

    ECA special report on EESC/CoR: findings, responses and parliamentary scrutiny

    ECA Member Kasasová presents the Court’s audit of the EESC and CoR on opinion quality, timeliness and impact, after which both committees’ Secretaries‑General detail ongoing and planned reforms, and MEPs scrutinise whether these advisory bodies deliver timely, visible and politically relevant input to EU law‑making.

    In this chapter

    1. ECA special report: roles and performance of EESC and CoRAndreas Schwab
    2. EESC and CoR responses to ECA findingsAndreas Schwab
    3. MEP scrutiny of EESC/CoR impact, timeliness and added valueTomáš Zdechovský

    Watch the moment

  12. GMT+2

    Committee on Budgetary Control Ordinary meeting

    EPPO/OLAF access to VAT data: draft opinion and initial reactions

    Draftsperson Boyer presents his opinion on amending Regulation 904/2010 to improve EPPO/OLAF access to VAT and customs data against large‑scale fraud, followed by initial reactions from MEPs, the Commission and OLAF on the scope, data flows, safeguards and proportionality of reinforced EU‑level anti‑fraud cooperation.

    In this chapter

    1. EPPO/OLAF VAT data access: Boyer’s draft opinionGilles Boyer
    2. MEPs, Commission and OLAF on VAT fraud, data access and safeguardsAndreas Schwab

    Watch the moment

  13. GMT+1

    Committee on Budgetary Control Ordinary meeting

    Item 12: Political group positions on Global Europe and closure

    Political groups and members debate flexibility versus predictability, reporting and control burdens for partner countries, Ukraine funding, humanitarian envelopes, development focus and geopolitical reliability, after which the rapporteur reiterates demands on transparency, ring‑fencing and long‑term predictability before the Chair closes the meeting.

    In this chapter

    1. Political group reactions: flexibility vs predictability and control burden
    2. Further member concerns: Ukraine funding, development focus and reliabilityBert-Jan Ruissen
    3. Rapporteur’s wrap‑up on transparency, 0.7% target and predictability; meeting closureMarit Maij

    Watch the moment

  14. GMT+1

    Committee on Budgetary Control Ordinary meeting

    Item 12: Global Europe instrument: framework and Commission position

    The Chair and rapporteur Maij introduce the Global Europe external action instrument, emphasising traceability, audit access and democratic oversight, while the Commission argues for relying on horizontal performance and financial regulations, avoiding parallel control systems, and explains governance via the Investment Board and performance‑based plans for partner countries.

    In this chapter

    1. Introduction of Item 12: Global Europe instrument and rapporteur’s prioritiesAndreas Schwab
    2. Commission views on Global Europe: performance regulation and governanceAndreas Schwab

    Watch the moment

  15. GMT+1

    Committee on Budgetary Control Ordinary meeting

    Item 11: MEP scrutiny and ECA–Commission exchange on MFF risks

    MEPs, led by the Chair, Deutsch and Heinäluoma, question the realism, transparency, flexibility mechanisms, debt implications and auditability of the MFF package, prompting Commission clarifications on envelopes and NGEU repayment and an ECA rebuttal stressing weak national systems, inadequate performance metrics and structural debt and headroom risks before Item 11 is closed.

    In this chapter

    1. Chair and Mr Deutsch: concerns on flexibility, opacity and debtAndreas Schwab
    2. Commission clarification on flexibility mechanisms, envelopes and NGEU repaymentAndreas Schwab
    3. Mr Heinäluoma and Chair: questions on performance, equal treatment and auditabilityEero Heinäluoma
    4. ECA rebuttal, debt risks and closing of Item 11Andreas Schwab

    Watch the moment

  16. GMT+1

    Committee on Budgetary Control Ordinary meeting

    Item 11: ECA assessment of MFF 2028–2034 proposals

    President Murphy presents the Court of Auditors’ horizontal opinion on the next MFF, detailing the Commission’s plans for new own resources, the European Fund and CAP integration, and thematic findings on EU added value, priorities, financing, simplification, performance indicators and control gaps, followed by the Commission’s defence of its assurance and performance framework.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening of Item 11 and introduction of ECA President MurphyAndreas Schwab
    2. MFF 2028–2034 proposals and new own resources
    3. European Fund and CAP: integration, uncertainty and risks

    Watch the moment

  17. GMT+1

    Committee on Budgetary Control Ordinary meeting

    Item 10: RDF control study: presentation and conclusions

    The committee hears the study on management and control structures for RDF programmes in post‑2004 Member States, covering scope, methodology, governance models, performance–compliance trade‑offs, case‑study evidence on administrative capacity and digitalisation, and concluding on the need for stable, simplified rules before closing Item 10.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening of meeting and introduction of RDF studyAndreas Schwab
    2. Study scope, methodology and 13 Member States covered
    3. Evolution of cohesion control framework and governance models

    Watch the moment

  18. GMT+1

    Committee on Budgetary Control Ordinary meeting

    Budgetary control and legislative votes: EU agencies, EIB, Horizon Europe

    Committee stage voting sequence covering 2023 discharge decisions for EU agencies, adoption of the own-initiative report on EIB Group financial activities control, and final votes on the Horizon Europe regulation report, setting Parliament’s positions on budget implementation, financial oversight and research funding framework.

    In this chapter

    1. Discharge 2023: EU agencies: individual decisions and resolutionAndreas Schwab
    2. EIB Group financial activities control: INI report voteAndreas Schwab
    3. Horizon Europe regulation report: compromise and final votesAndreas Schwab

    Watch the moment

  19. GMT+1

    Committee on Budgetary Control Ordinary meeting

    Commission discharge 2024: voting organisation and adoption

    After technical preparations for electronic voting and a brief introduction by Freund, the committee conducts a long sequence of votes on granting discharge to the Commission for the 2024 EU budget and its resolution text, including compromises on political priorities, MFF and RRF, and adopts the final discharge by 21 votes to 7.

    In this chapter

    1. Set-up for electronic voting and introduction to dischargeAndreas Schwab
    2. Discharge 2024: Commission budget, political priorities and MFF/RRFAndreas Schwab

    Watch the moment

  20. GMT+1

    Committee on Budgetary Control Ordinary meeting

    Erasmus+ 2028–2034: political positions and legal dispute

    Shadows and MEPs set out group positions on Erasmus+ governance, funding priorities, anti-fraud controls and committee competences, including sharp disagreement over the suspension of Hungarian entities and rule-of-law conditionality, before Freund responds to criticisms and the Chair announces deadlines for amendments and the vote schedule.

    In this chapter

    1. EPP (Protas via Zdechovský): support with limits on amendmentsTomáš Zdechovský
    2. S&D/other shadows: access, controls and committee remit
    3. Hungarian MEP: contesting Erasmus suspension for HungaryThomas Pellerin-Carlin

    Watch the moment

  21. GMT+1

    Committee on Budgetary Control Ordinary meeting

    Opening of CONT meeting and Erasmus+ mandate

    The Chair opens the CONT meeting, adopts the agenda and previous minutes, and introduces the Erasmus+ 2028–2034 regulation file, after which Rapporteur Freund presents his draft opinion, outlining priorities on funding stability, mobility focus, Hungarian beneficiaries, and reduced bureaucracy within a strong control framework.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening of CONT meeting and agenda adoptionAndreas Schwab
    2. Rapporteur Freund: priorities for Erasmus+ 2028–2034Daniel Freund

    Watch the moment

  22. GMT+1

    CONT Scrutiny Working Group

    DG Budget on LIFE criteria, lobbying guidance and follow‑up

    DG Budget defends LIFE evaluation criteria as compliant with the Regulation, explains implementation of the 2024 guidance on lobbying‑related activities, addresses questions on targeted lobbying, errors and possible financial or contractual consequences, and concludes with clarifications on the ‘don’t write it vs don’t do it’ distinction, requested written follow‑up and adjournment of the meeting.

    In this chapter

    1. DG Budget: LIFE criteria, Annex III and impact of guidelinesDirk Gotink
    2. Targeted lobbying in grants, reputational risk and legal consequencesCarlo Fidanza
    3. Clarifying ‘don’t write it’ vs ‘don’t do it’, follow‑up and closureMonika Hohlmeier

    Watch the moment

  23. GMT+1

    CONT Scrutiny Working Group

    Transparency of evaluators, GDPR constraints and contractors

    MEPs press for project‑level identification of experts for democratic scrutiny, confronting CINEA and DG Budget on GDPR‑based anonymisation and Parliament’s discharge powers, and then query the outsourcing of expert management, publication of expert names and overall numbers under the external framework contract.

    In this chapter

    1. Demeter and chair: transparency of individual experts vs GDPRCsaba Dömötör
    2. External contractors for expert management and publication of namesDirk Gotink

    Watch the moment

  24. GMT+1

    CONT Scrutiny Working Group

    MEP Fidanza on NGO lobbying and CINEA’s defence

    MEP Fidanza challenges CINEA on large‑scale funding of advocacy NGOs, alleged political influence and non‑implementation of 2024 guidelines, while CINEA defends the objectivity of its expert‑based system and explains how and when the new guidance has been applied to grants.

    In this chapter

    1. Fidanza: funded NGOs’ lobbying and political influenceCarlo Fidanza
    2. CINEA’s defence of evaluation system and handling of 2024 guidelinesAndreas Schwab

    Watch the moment

  25. GMT+1

    CONT Scrutiny Working Group

    CINEA: LIFE evaluation workflow and conflicts of interest

    CINEA presents the legal framework, evaluation process and use of independent experts for LIFE calls, followed by MEP questions on conflicts of interest, expert networks, incentives and rotation, and CINEA’s description of safeguards and sanctions.

    In this chapter

    1. CINEA: LIFE programme evaluation flow and use of expertsAndreas Schwab
    2. Q&A: conflicts of interest, expert networks and rotationDirk Gotink

    Watch the moment

  26. GMT+1

    CONT Scrutiny Working Group

    Opening of scrutiny meeting and mandate on CINEA

    The chair opens the scrutiny working group, adopts the agenda, recalls confidentiality and webstreaming rules, and co‑rapporteurs define the scope, rationale and expectations of the inquiry into CINEA’s management of LIFE and related programmes.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening, agenda and confidentiality rulesAndreas Schwab
    2. Co‑rapporteurs: rationale and scope of scrutiny on CINEADirk Gotink

    Watch the moment

  27. GMT+1

    Committee on Budgetary Control Ordinary meeting

    Rapporteur’s closing remarks and procedural timeline

    Rapporteur Knotek defends the committee’s role in strengthening control and transparency within the ECF and invites amendments; the Chair then formally closes the debate, announces the amendment deadline (9 March, 14:00) and the committee vote date (15 April), and reminds members of the upcoming joint budget committee meeting.

    Watch the moment

Schedule

  1. Replay

    Watch the replay

  2. Replay

    Watch the replay

  3. Replay

    Part 1Part 2

  4. Replay

    Watch the replay

  5. Replay

    Watch the replay

  6. Replay

    Watch the replay

  7. Replay

    Watch the replay

  8. Replay

    Part 1Part 2Part 3

  9. Replay

    Watch the replay

  10. Replay

    Watch the replay

  11. Replay

    Watch the replay

  12. Replay

    Watch the replay

  13. Upcoming
    Committee on Budgetary Control Ordinary meeting CONT Committee meeting
  14. Upcoming
    Committee on Budgetary Control Ordinary meeting CONT Committee meeting
  15. Upcoming
    Committee on Budgetary Control - Extraordinary meeting
  16. Upcoming
    Committee on Budgetary Control - Meeting
  17. Upcoming
    Committee on Budgetary Control - Meeting

Who spoke at the committee

  • Tomáš Zdechovský 22 sittings
  • Andreas Schwab 19 sittings
  • Daniel Freund 19 sittings
  • Dick Erixon 15 sittings
  • Jonas Sjöstedt 15 sittings
  • Monika Hohlmeier 14 sittings
  • Bert-Jan Ruissen 9 sittings
  • Eero Heinäluoma 9 sittings
  • Gilles Boyer 9 sittings
  • Niclas Herbst 9 sittings
  • Ondřej Knotek 9 sittings
  • Carla Tavares 8 sittings
  • Caterina Chinnici 7 sittings
  • Julien Sanchez 7 sittings
  • Arno Bausemer 6 sittings
  • Dirk Gotink 5 sittings
  • Giuseppe Lupo 5 sittings
  • Kinga Kollár 5 sittings
  • Piotr Serafin 5 sittings
  • Csaba Dömötör 4 sittings
  • Maria Grapini 4 sittings
  • Olivier Chastel 4 sittings
  • Raffaele Fitto 4 sittings
  • Tamás Deutsch 4 sittings
  • Virginie Joron 4 sittings
  • Alexander Jungbluth 3 sittings
  • Carlo Fidanza 3 sittings
  • Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy 3 sittings
  • José Cepeda 3 sittings
  • Michael McGrath 3 sittings

Where these transcripts come from

European Parliament broadcasts the sittings of the Committee on Budgetary Control (CONT). Polyfact shows each one live, keeps it as a replay with its transcript and links its key moments to the second they were said.

66 sittings on Polyfact since 14 May 2025

Polyfact records and transcribes the sittings and committee hearings of European Union's parliaments. A speaker is named only once their identity is confirmed, by the official record or by a person; automatic guesses are left out.

Every committee

Questions

How can I watch the Committee on Budgetary Control (CONT) live?

On Polyfact, free and without an account: a sitting on air is marked live in the schedule above, and each sitting stays available as a replay.

Is it free?

Yes. Watching the sittings on Polyfact is free and needs no account. A Polyfact subscription, which you can try for free, adds the full transcripts as soon as they are ready, search across every sitting and alerts on your topics.

Where is the transcript of the Committee on Budgetary Control (CONT)?

On each sitting's page on Polyfact, speaker by speaker, with its key moments one click from the second they were said. The search on this page covers the sittings held more than two weeks ago.

Follow every committee without searching

With a Polyfact plan you read every sitting as soon as it is transcribed, ask questions to the video assistant and get an alert as soon as your topics come up.

14-day free trial. A card is required, nothing is charged for 14 days, and you can cancel anytime.

Updated