European Parliament

How to watch the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (FEMM)

Every sitting is free to watch on Polyfact, live and on replay, no account needed.

Latest updates

Latest update 6 days ago

What is said in the sittings, update by update, the latest first. Each update opens the video at the second it was said.

  1. GMT+1

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Ordinary meeting

    Study on defunding women’s rights CSOs: findings, backlash and EU funding

    The Chair introduces the study on defunding women’s rights organisations and gender backsliding, the authors document funding cuts, administrative harassment and diversion of resources away from specialist services, analyse anti‑gender networks and the concept of backsliding without formal legal repeal, and MEPs clash over the framing of ‘backsliding’ while raising concerns about migrant women, threatened national services and low Daphne success rates; the authors then recommend multi‑annual operating grants, more accessible and traceable EU funding (including Daphne and GAP IV targets), and safeguards to ensure EU money supports specialist feminist services rather than anti‑equality actors, before the Chair closes the public meeting.

    In this chapter

    1. Intro to study on defunding women’s rights CSOsLina Gálvez
    2. Defunding study: role of WROs and mounting financial pressuresHedvika Janečková
    3. Defunding study: loss of specialist services, anti‑gender actors and backslidingRebecca Tildesley

    Watch the moment

  2. GMT+1

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Ordinary meeting

    Debate on gender mainstreaming implementation, quotas and delegations

    MEPs debate how to operationalise gender mainstreaming and gender budgeting, including better uptake of FEMM amendments, mandatory justifications when they are rejected, divergent views on gender quotas in party lists, the role of delegations and external relations, and the need for resources, monitoring and civil society engagement to turn formal equality into concrete institutional change, before co‑rapporteurs and the Chair signal next steps and the January vote.

    In this chapter

    1. Debate: mainstreaming tools, EIGE support and FEMM’s uptakeElisabeth Grossmann
    2. Delegations, leadership quotas and civil society resourcesGiusi Princi

    Watch the moment

  3. GMT+1

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Ordinary meeting

    Gender mainstreaming report: mandate, tools and budget focus

    The Chair closes the AI item and introduces the annual report on gender mainstreaming in the European Parliament, as co‑rapporteurs and the BUDG opinion rapporteur present priorities on women’s access to Parliament and leadership, gender‑responsive budgeting across EU institutions and the entire budget cycle, systematic use of EIGE tools and sex‑disaggregated data, and the need for standardised gender impact assessments, stronger FEMM influence, and clear timetables under Parliament’s Gender Action Plan.

    In this chapter

    1. Transition: from AI study to gender mainstreaming fileLina Gálvez
    2. Gender mainstreaming report: scope, data and safe workplacesValérie Devaux
    3. Co‑rapporteur Kuhnke: implementation gaps and FEMM’s weak influenceAlice Kuhnke
    4. BUDG opinion: gender budgeting across the EU budgetLucia Yar

    Watch the moment

  4. GMT+1

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Ordinary meeting

    Authors’ responses on AI regulation, enforcement and bias

    The study authors respond to MEPs on how AI can be steered for positive equality outcomes via feminist, rights‑based regulation, explain enforcement and accountability challenges under the AI Act and DSA (including limits of self‑assessment, de‑risking, resourcing of equality bodies and trusted flaggers, and the AI Office’s guidance role), and clarify how unconscious developer bias, data gaps, moderation practices and weak complaint handling reproduce structural gender inequalities beyond classic discrimination concepts.

    In this chapter

    1. Authors’ replies: AI for good, enforcement, civil society and de‑riskingLina Gálvez
    2. Co‑author replies: unconscious bias, values, data gaps and trainingCarlotta Rigotti

    Watch the moment

  5. GMT+1

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Ordinary meeting

    MEP positions on AI, gender bias and online violence

    Rapporteur and shadow speakers from multiple groups outline political priorities and concerns on AI’s risks and opportunities for gender equality, focusing on online abuse, deepfakes and hypersexualisation, the limits of current bans and classifications, structural discrimination in labour and welfare, data and NGO roles, and the need for stronger enforcement, reporting systems and a possible EU‑wide AI liability regime, including reference to stricter national approaches such as Italy’s labour rules.

    In this chapter

    1. Rapporteur statement (Greek): AI risks, opportunities and legal conceptsEleonora Meleti
    2. S&D: AI, online violence and structural discriminationAlessandra Moretti
    3. Patriots (ECR‑aligned): deepfakes, hypersexualisation and valuesMargarita de la Pisa Carrión

    Watch the moment

  6. GMT+1

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Ordinary meeting

    FEMM opening and AI gender‑bias study mandate

    The Chair opens the FEMM meeting during Gender Equality Week, sets the agenda and links the commissioned study on gender bias and AI to the committee’s own‑initiative work, while the authors present their research questions, impacts across key life domains and tech‑facilitated GBV, and a detailed analysis of the EU legal framework (equality law, GDPR, DSA, AI Act, VAW directive), including remedies, gaps and recommendations.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening: agenda for FEMM meeting and AI studyLina Gálvez
    2. Study Q1: defining gender bias in AICarlotta Rigotti
    3. Study Q2–Q3: impacts across life domains and tech‑facilitated GBVCarlotta Rigotti
    4. Study Q4–Q6: EU legal framework, AI Act, remedies and gapsLina Gálvez

    Watch the moment

  7. GMT+1

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Ordinary meeting HEARING

    Panel replies and FEMM chair’s conclusions

    Panelists answer MEPs on differentiating democratic debate from anti‑democratic tactics, foreign funding, EU funding instruments and security framing of gendered and digital violence, after which the FEMM Chair underlines anti‑gender campaigns as a threat to EU democracy and announces follow‑up work on the gender‑based violence directive.

    Watch the moment

  8. GMT+1

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Ordinary meeting HEARING

    MEP questions: geopolitics, competence and backlash

    The AFET standing rapporteur and MEPs from several political groups connect anti‑gender mobilisations to Gaza and global politics, question EU competences, funding priorities and demographic narratives, and confront each other and the panel on SRHR, LGBTQIA+ recognition, abortion, and links to racism and authoritarianism.

    In this chapter

    1. AFET rapporteur Jalloul: intersection with Gaza and global contextHana Jalloul Muro
    2. First round of political group questions and reactionsCsaba Bogdán
    3. Short additional interventions from membersLina Gálvez

    Watch the moment

  9. GMT+1

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Ordinary meeting

    Backlash impacts, SRHR rollbacks and European responses

    Speakers highlight the lived consequences of queerphobia and political hate, document SRHR and LGBTQI rollbacks, shrinking civic space and defunding of equality NGOs, and set out EU‑level recommendations and Nordic research insights treating the anti‑gender agenda as a systemic threat requiring stronger legal, financial and democratic safeguards.

    In this chapter

    1. Liberty Simon (Slovakia): lived impact of queerphobia and political hate
    2. IPPF EN: SRHR backlash, shrinking civic space and funding cuts
    3. IPPF EN: EU-level recommendations to defend SRHR and democracy
    4. Nordic perspective on anti-gender mobilisation: research framework

    Watch the moment

  10. GMT+1

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Ordinary meeting

    Towards EU best standards: ‘most-favoured woman’ clause and feminist networking

    Camille Butin presents the updated ‘most‑favoured European woman’ clause concept for elevating EU law to the best national standards on women’s and LGBTQIA+ rights, and describes Choisir’s cross‑country mapping work and the creation of an intersectional European feminist secretariat to coordinate partners.

    In this chapter

    1. Choisir / Clause de l’Européenne la plus favorisée: concept and method
    2. European feminist network: country tour and intersectional secretariat

    Watch the moment

  11. GMT+1

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Ordinary meeting HEARING

    Civil society testimonies: laws, services, security risks

    Civil society speakers from EU member states and Nordic countries present best‑practice equality laws, on‑the‑ground experiences of queer youth, shrinking civic space for SRHR providers, funding cuts, and evidence of coordinated harassment that raises hybrid security concerns for democratic institutions.

    In this chapter

    1. Lucas & Simon: ‘best of Europe’ laws and lived backlashViolaine Lucas
    2. Boutin: SRHR backlash, civic space and EU fundingCamille Butin
    3. Honkasalo: Nordic survey and hybrid security concernLina Gálvez

    Watch the moment

  12. GMT+1

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Ordinary meeting

    Anti-gender movement infrastructure: funding, legal strategies and geopolitics

    Neil Datta details the rapid growth and five‑pillar structure of anti‑gender actors in Europe, their links to US networks, and their use of legal, policy and digital challenges (including to EU law and the Istanbul Convention) as part of a broader authoritarian and geopolitical project undermining SRHR, LGBTI rights and democratic norms.

    In this chapter

    1. Neil Datta: surge in anti-gender funding and five-dimensional infrastructure
    2. Neil Datta: normative attacks, democracy and geopolitics

    Watch the moment

  13. GMT+1

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Ordinary meeting HEARING

    Chair’s introduction and anti‑gender infrastructure

    The FEMM Chair opens the Gender Equality Week hearing, sets the political and institutional context with President Metsola’s message, and the first expert maps the financing, structure and strategic targets of the anti‑gender movement and its links to democratic backsliding and authoritarian actors.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening of FEMM hearing and Metsola videoLina Gálvez
    2. Datta: financing and structure of anti‑gender movementLina Gálvez

    Watch the moment

  14. GMT+1

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Ordinary meeting

    Gender Equality Week hearing: institutional framing and panel setup

    The Chair opens the ‘Women’s Rights Under Pressure’ hearing in the context of Gender Equality Week, presents President Metsola’s message on leadership and internal reforms, and frames the session with reference to reduced female representation, US developments and funding cuts before introducing the mixed panel of EU and civil‑society actors.

    In this chapter

    1. Hearing opened: backlash against gender equality and US election contextLina Gálvez
    2. President Metsola video: leadership, ceilings and proxy voting reform
    3. Chair: framing gender backlash and introducing panelLina Gálvez

    Watch the moment

  15. GMT+1

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Ordinary meeting

    Chemical submission file: consent, EU competences and enforcement tools

    The committee debates the chemical submission report in connection with the EU gender‑based violence directive, with the rapporteur and shadows addressing consent‑based rape definitions, victim‑centred care, EU‑wide definitions, platform liability, cross‑border policing and disagreements over EU criminal‑law harmonisation before scheduling a January vote.

    In this chapter

    1. Chemical submission file: introduction and link to GBV directiveLina Gálvez
    2. Rapporteur Rafowicz: consent, aggravating circumstances and victim accessLina Gálvez
    3. Rapporteur Rafowicz: platforms, data, funding and EU health monitoringLina Gálvez

    Watch the moment

  16. GMT+1

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Ordinary meeting

    FEMM meeting opening and CSW71 legislative groundwork

    The Chair opens the FEMM meeting, adopts the agenda and introduces the CSW71 recommendation process, with the rapporteur and shadows outlining priorities and political divergences on economic independence, care, SRHR, climate, security and EU unity ahead of the 3 December vote and March New York mission.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening of FEMM meeting and agenda adoptionLina Gálvez
    2. CSW71 item introduced: themes and timetableLina Gálvez
    3. CSW71 file procedure: rapporteur and amendmentsLina Gálvez

    Watch the moment

  17. GMT+1
  18. GMT+2

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Ordinary meeting

    Gender mainstreaming: political debate, expert replies and closing

    Groups clash over quotas, zip lists, gender budgeting and institutional competence, after which experts and co‑rapporteurs address costs, evidence and parity mechanisms; the chair then recalls amendment deadlines, promotes Equality Week and formally closes the FEMM meeting with the next session dates.

    In this chapter

    1. Political group reactions: quotas, competence and implementationElisabeth Dieringer
    2. Expert clarifications, co‑rapporteur closing and meeting conclusionIrmhild Boßdorf
    3. Any other business, Equality Week and next FEMM meetingLina Gálvez

    Watch the moment

  19. GMT+2

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Ordinary meeting

    Gender mainstreaming in the EP: EPRS study and INI priorities

    EPRS experts present findings on the state of gender mainstreaming and persistent gaps in the Parliament, and the co‑rapporteurs outline INI priorities on committee gender action plans, impact assessments, gender‑responsive budgeting, institutional structures and intersectional analysis.

    In this chapter

    1. EPRS study: state of gender mainstreaming in the EPLina Gálvez
    2. Co‑rapporteurs: gender mainstreaming INI priorities and gapsValérie Devaux

    Watch the moment

  20. GMT+2

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Ordinary meeting

    Chemical submission INI: group positions and amendment deadline

    Patriots and ECR stress national criminal‑law competence and evidentiary issues, while Renew, Greens and the Left call for a stronger EU framework on definitions, toxicology access, consent‑based rape laws and platform liability, with the chair closing the item and setting the amendment deadline.

    In this chapter

    1. Patriots/ECR on chemical submission: competence and evidentiary focusCatherine Griset
    2. Renew, Greens and Left: stronger EU framework on chemical submissionAssita Kanko

    Watch the moment

  21. GMT+2

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Ordinary meeting

    Chemical submission INI: rapporteur statement and break

    Following a short procedural pause due to the delayed rapporteur, the chair explains the scheduling decision and then reads the rapporteur’s statement outlining chemical submission as drug‑facilitated sexual violence and proposing eight EU‑level priorities on consent, evidence, data, platforms and victim support.

    In this chapter

    1. Procedural issue: delayed rapporteur and short break decisionAssita Kanko
    2. Chemical submission rapporteur statement: EU‑level prioritiesLina Gálvez

    Watch the moment

  22. GMT+2

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Ordinary meeting

    Menopause INI: political reactions and next steps

    Shadows from different groups set out contrasting views on EU competence, workplace obligations, medical research and the risk of ‘ideologisation’, while the rapporteur responds on data gaps, FP10 and MFF linkages, clarifies the empowerment aim, and announces the amendments deadline.

    In this chapter

    1. Shadows on menopause: health, labour rights, ideology and AICatherine Griset
    2. Chair’s response on menopause: data gaps, FP10 and budget linkageLina Gálvez

    Watch the moment

  23. GMT+2

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Ordinary meeting

    Meeting opening and menopause INI introduction

    The chair opens the FEMM meeting, adopts the agenda and minutes, and, as rapporteur, presents the draft INI report on menopause, framing it as a major but neglected women’s health and labour‑market issue requiring an EU strategy, better research funding and workplace support.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening of FEMM meeting and agenda adoptionLina Gálvez
    2. Rapporteur Gálvez: menopause INI: scope and EU strategyLina Gálvez

    Watch the moment

  24. GMT+2

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Ordinary meeting

    AI and gender: EPRS evidence and Members’ reactions

    After the Chair hands over to EPRS, its expert presents research on AI’s gendered opportunities and risks, including documented bias in AI systems, deepfakes, online violence, economic discrimination, health data gaps and privacy concerns around femtech. Members then react with questions and comments on rural women’s access and protection, AI’s implications for democracy and Parliament’s work, and the need to address gender‑based online and political violence within broader institutional debates on AI governance.

    In this chapter

    1. Chair transition to EPRS input on AI and genderLina Gálvez
    2. EPRS (Bentzen) I: Opportunities and early evidence of AI gender bias
    3. EPRS (Bentzen) II: Deepfakes, LLM bias, femtech data and economic impactNaja Bentzen
    4. Members’ reactions: rural access, democracy, and gendered online violence

    Watch the moment

  25. GMT+2

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Ordinary meeting

    Gender Mainstreaming Network: opening and Commission on AI and gender

    The Gender Mainstreaming Network meeting is opened with procedural points, announcements on European Gender Equality Week and the annual gender mainstreaming report, and the introduction of a thematic exchange on gender equality and artificial intelligence. The Commission’s AI Office then outlines women’s underrepresentation in AI and ICT, details EU skills and education initiatives to increase women’s participation, and explains how the AI Act aims to prevent discriminatory AI outcomes while calling for coordinated action across stakeholders to close the gender gap in AI.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening of Gender Mainstreaming Network and announcementsDainius Žalimas
    2. Commission (Sioli) I: Women’s underrepresentation in AI and skills gap
    3. Commission (Sioli) II: EU skills, education and support programmes
    4. Commission (Sioli) III: AI Act, bias risks and call for coordinated action

    Watch the moment

  26. GMT+2

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Ordinary meeting

    CSW71 item: political groups’ positions and ideological divide

    Political groups respond to the draft CSW71 report, with S&D backing the substance but questioning rapporteur neutrality, Patriots for Europe attacking what they see as an ideological gender agenda and costs, and Renew, Greens and The Left pushing for strong language on SRHR, climate, violence, participation and funding for women’s organisations. ESN and feminist MEPs clash over motherhood, STEM quotas and the scope of gender equality policies, before the rapporteur and Chair close by defending the process, clarifying budget figures and calling for a strong, common EU line towards the Council and at CSW.

    In this chapter

    1. S&D: content support and concern over rapporteur neutralityJoanna Scheuring-Wielgus
    2. Patriots for Europe criticism and Chair’s budget clarificationMargarita de la Pisa Carrión
    3. Renew, Greens, Left: SRHR, climate, participation and funding at CSW71Dainius Žalimas
    4. ESN and feminist counter-arguments; rapporteur closingIrmhild Boßdorf

    Watch the moment

  27. GMT+2

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Ordinary meeting

    CSW71 draft report: political group positions and closing

    Political groups present contrasting views on the draft CSW71 report, with S&D, Renew, Greens and The Left seeking ambitious language on poverty, climate, SRHR and violence, while conservative members criticise the gender agenda and emphasise motherhood; the rapporteur and chair close by defending the process and calling for a unified Parliament line for New York.

    In this chapter

    1. S&D (Scheuring‑Wielgus): content priorities and concern on rapporteur choiceJoanna Scheuring-Wielgus
    2. Patriots for Europe (De la Pisa): critique of gender agenda and EU spendingMargarita de la Pisa Carrión
    3. Renew, Greens, Left: support with focus on SRHR, climate and online violenceLina Gálvez

    Watch the moment

  28. GMT+2

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Ordinary meeting

    CSW71 EU priorities: mandate and rapporteur presentation

    The chair introduces the draft report on EU priorities for the 71st UN Commission on the Status of Women, and the rapporteur outlines the strategic focus on women’s economic autonomy, decent work, STEM skills and green/digital transitions, stressing implementation tools, data and the EU’s role in shaping a credible common position.

    In this chapter

    1. Introduction to CSW71 EU priorities and mandateLina Gálvez
    2. Rapporteur Princi: strategic focus on economic autonomy and transitionsGiusi Princi
    3. Rapporteur Princi: implementation tools and EU roleGiusi Princi

    Watch the moment

Schedule

  1. Replay

    Watch the replay

  2. Replay

    Watch the replay

  3. Replay

    Watch the replay

  4. Replay

    Watch the replay

  5. Replay

    Watch the replay

  6. Replay

    Watch the replay

  7. Replay

    Part 1Part 2

  8. Replay

    Watch the replay

  9. Replay

    Watch the replay

  10. Replay

    Watch the replay

  11. Replay

    Watch the replay

  12. Replay

    Watch the replay

  13. Upcoming
    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality - Ordinary meeting
  14. Upcoming
    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality - Ordinary meeting · Hearing
  15. Upcoming
    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality - Ordinary meeting
  16. Upcoming
    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality - Ordinary meeting
  17. Upcoming
    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality - Meeting

Who spoke at the committee

  • Lina Gálvez 29 sittings
  • Margarita de la Pisa Carrión 18 sittings
  • Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle 14 sittings
  • Carolina Morace 12 sittings
  • Abir Al-Sahlani 10 sittings
  • Irmhild Boßdorf 10 sittings
  • Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus 9 sittings
  • Eleonora Meleti 8 sittings
  • Giusi Princi 8 sittings
  • Hanna Gedin 8 sittings
  • Maria Walsh 8 sittings
  • Beatrice Timgren 7 sittings
  • Maria Noichl 7 sittings
  • Heléne Fritzon 6 sittings
  • Mélissa Camara 6 sittings
  • Alessandra Moretti 5 sittings
  • Anna Strolenberg 5 sittings
  • Billy Kelleher 5 sittings
  • Cecilia Strada 5 sittings
  • Lucia Yar 5 sittings
  • Marianne Vind 5 sittings
  • Paulo do Nascimento Cabral 5 sittings
  • Valérie Devaux 5 sittings
  • Elisabeth Grossmann 4 sittings
  • Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska 4 sittings
  • Katrin Langensiepen 4 sittings
  • Mélissa Camara 4 sittings
  • Rosa Estaràs Ferragut 4 sittings
  • Birgit Sippel 3 sittings
  • Dainius Žalimas 3 sittings

Where these transcripts come from

European Parliament broadcasts the sittings of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (FEMM). Polyfact shows each one live, keeps it as a replay with its transcript and links its key moments to the second they were said.

67 sittings on Polyfact since 10 April 2025

Polyfact records and transcribes the sittings and committee hearings of European Union's parliaments. A speaker is named only once their identity is confirmed, by the official record or by a person; automatic guesses are left out.

Every committee

Questions

How can I watch the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (FEMM) live?

On Polyfact, free and without an account: a sitting on air is marked live in the schedule above, and each sitting stays available as a replay.

Is it free?

Yes. Watching the sittings on Polyfact is free and needs no account. A Polyfact subscription, which you can try for free, adds the full transcripts as soon as they are ready, search across every sitting and alerts on your topics.

Where is the transcript of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (FEMM)?

On each sitting's page on Polyfact, speaker by speaker, with its key moments one click from the second they were said. The search on this page covers the sittings held more than two weeks ago.

Follow every committee without searching

With a Polyfact plan you read every sitting as soon as it is transcribed, ask questions to the video assistant and get an alert as soon as your topics come up.

14-day free trial. A card is required, nothing is charged for 14 days, and you can cancel anytime.

Updated