Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Ordinary meeting
Panel 2: academic, civil society and industry perspectives on age assurance
A second panel of academics, digital‑rights NGOs, child‑rights advocates and OpenAge experts critically assess the Commission’s app, warn against surveillance and censorship risks, propose user‑centric portable credentials, and respond to MEPs’ questions on effectiveness, proportionality, public acceptance and the balance between enforcement of existing law and new technical tools.
In this chapter
- Panel 2 opening: academic and civil society perspectivesJavier Zarzalejos
- Professor Rannenberg: technical critique of EU AV appJavier Zarzalejos
- Civil society (EDRi, Five Rights): fundamental rights and risk‑based assuranceJavier Zarzalejos
- OpenAge: user‑centric, portable age credentialsJavier Zarzalejos
- Panel 2 Q&A: effectiveness, proportionality, and enforcement v. new toolsJavier Zarzalejos