European Parliament

How to watch the Committee on Public Health (SANT)

Every sitting is free to watch on Polyfact, live and on replay, no account needed.

Latest updates

What is said in the sittings, update by update, the latest first. Each update opens the video at the second it was said.

  1. GMT+2

    Committee on Public Health Ordinary meeting

    Psychosocial risks and mental health at work: draft opinion

    The rapporteur presents the draft opinion on psychosocial risks at work, shadows call for an EU directive and address AI‑driven workloads and permanent availability, and additional members and the rapporteur discuss vulnerable workers, recruitment practices, and the need for a balanced but effective EU approach ahead of the amendment deadline.

    In this chapter

    1. Psychosocial risks and mental health at work: rapporteur presentationStine Bosse
    2. Shadows for EPP and S&D: AI, culture of availability and need for an EU directiveStine Bosse
    3. Additional views and rapporteur’s conclusion on psychosocial risksStine Bosse

    Watch the moment

  2. GMT+2

    Committee on Public Health Ordinary meeting

    Draft opinion on NRP Fund: health as strategic priority

    The committee examines the draft opinion on the National and Regional Partnership Fund, with rapporteur Negrescu and shadows arguing for a dedicated health chapter and a 4% health investment target, members debating fund efficiency and impacts on farmers, and the Commission outlining the merged plans’ design and health dimension before the rapporteur’s closing and amendment deadline announcement.

    In this chapter

    1. Introduction to draft opinion on NRP fundStine Bosse
    2. Rapporteur Negrescu: health investment and 4% targetVictor Negrescu
    3. Shadow rapporteurs: support for health chapter and additionalityStine Bosse

    Watch the moment

  3. GMT+2

    Committee on Public Health Ordinary meeting

    Opening of SANT meeting and vote on gender inequalities opinion

    Chair Bosse opens the SANT meeting, adopts the agenda and minutes, and leads the presentation and full vote on the opinion addressing gender inequalities in health, including compromises, amendments and final roll‑call adoption.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening, agenda and minutes adoptedStine Bosse
    2. Opinion on gender inequalities in health: rapporteur and voteStine Bosse

    Watch the moment

  4. GMT+2

    Committee on Public Health Ordinary meeting

    Medical devices revision: safety guarantees, AI timelines and closure

    IMCO and health MEPs question how reduced audits and downgraded notified‑body involvement will still prevent scandals like PIP, call to preserve unannounced inspections, seek greater centralization for certain devices, faster and more transparent AI approvals, and mandatory sex‑ and age‑disaggregated evidence to address bias. Commissioner Várhelyi confirms unannounced inspections and safety standards remain, outlines new 110‑day AI approval targets, digital traceability via EuDaMed, better commercialization incentives in the next MFF, and gender‑sensitive prevention work, after which the Chair formally closes the debate and the SANT committee meeting, announcing the next session.

    In this chapter

    1. IMCO opinion and unannounced inspections: safety guarantees after PIPMaria Guzenina
    2. Centralization, AI approval gap and gender bias in devicesVytenis Povilas Andriukaitis
    3. Commission final reply: AI timelines, standards and gendered preventionOlivér Várhelyi
    4. Meeting closure and next SANT sessionRomana Jerković

    Watch the moment

  5. GMT+2

    Committee on Public Health Ordinary meeting

    Medical devices and IVD revision: Commission proposal and first debate

    Vice‑President Jerković opens the medical devices/IVD item and Commissioner Várhelyi presents the simplification package aimed at cutting costs and delays while preserving safety, including risk‑based classification changes, lighter reporting, harmonized notified‑body timelines, AI‑Act alignment, digital submissions, and SME‑sensitive fee rules. Rapporteur Schenk and the first shadows and practitioners welcome simplification but press on notified‑body capacity, safety after past scandals, divergent assessments, EMA vs national roles, low‑risk software and AI safeguards, PFAS coherence, SME support, affordability for public systems and incentives for reusable devices, prompting detailed Commission replies on fees, timelines, software classes, AI oversight, expert panels, and single‑use trends.

    In this chapter

    1. Introduction to medical devices and IVD revisionRomana Jerković
    2. Commissioner Várhelyi: main elements of medical devices proposalOlivér Várhelyi
    3. Rapporteur (Schenck): speed, notified bodies and software classificationOliver Schenk

    Watch the moment

  6. GMT+2

    Committee on Public Health Ordinary meeting

    SANT mission to Cyprus: health system findings

    The Chair presents the committee’s fact‑finding mission to Cyprus, detailing meetings and visits on access to medicines, rare diseases, workforce shortages, mental health, ageing and AI in healthcare, underlining the role of EU4Health after 2027. Nikos Papandreou showcases Cyprus’s mandatory premarital genetic screening for thalassemia as a best‑practice example of EU‑relevant prevention policy.

    Watch the moment

  7. GMT+2

    Committee on Public Health Ordinary meeting

    Cancer Plan: vaccine claims, cohesion and Commission reply

    A far‑right MEP promotes unsupported claims linking COVID vaccines and cancer, prompting other MEPs to rebut disinformation and refocus on cohesion, EU competences and concrete tools (Critical Medicines Act, pharma package, regulatory sandboxes, patient involvement) to reduce disparities, strengthen tobacco control and secure funding in the MFF. The Commission (DG SANTE) reacts positively to Parliament’s draft report, accepts Court of Auditors’ recommendations and stresses achievements and monitoring needs, before rapporteur Voiculescu closes the debate by calling for political accountability on screening, HPV vaccination, tobacco control and effective use of EU health innovation and AI.

    In this chapter

    1. Far‑right MEP: unsupported claims on COVID vaccines and cancerGerald Hauser
    2. Cohesion, EU competence and response to misinformation (Malta, Clergeau, Papandreou, González Casares)Peter Agius
    3. Commission (DG SANTE): reaction to Parliament’s cancer reportAdam Jarubas
    4. Rapporteur Voiculescu: political accountability, tobacco and AI innovationVlad Vasile-Voiculescu

    Watch the moment

  8. GMT+2

    Committee on Public Health Ordinary meeting

    Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan: rapporteur and main political groups

    The Chair opens the SANT meeting, adopts the agenda and gives the floor to rapporteur Voiculescu, followed by shadow rapporteurs and key groups outlining their political priorities on the Beating Cancer Plan, including prevention, funding, inequalities, rare cancers, lifestyle factors, and screening and vaccination. Speakers highlight East–West gaps, budget cuts to EU health programmes, rural access, and the balance between competitiveness and strong public‑health regulation on tobacco, alcohol, diet and early detection.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening of meeting and agenda adoptionAdam Jarubas
    2. Rapporteur Voiculescu: assessment of Europe’s Beating Cancer PlanVlad Vasile-Voiculescu
    3. Shadow rapporteur Arłukowicz: inequalities and access to treatmentBartosz Arłukowicz

    Watch the moment

  9. GMT+1

    Committee on Public Health Ordinary meeting Joint meeting Committee on Industry, Research and Energy Joint SANT-ITRE meeting

    Closing remarks: legislative timetable, framework role and translations

    Co‑rapporteurs call for a rapid Parliament position, using the Biotech Act as a horizontal framework across multiple laws with broader biotech definitions and mutual recognition, while the Commissioner and Chair insist on resolving translation delays and underline Parliament’s political support and urgency to advance the file.

    In this chapter

    1. Co‑rapporteurs’ closing: timetable, scope and definitionsVytenis Povilas Andriukaitis
    2. Commissioner’s final remark on translations and meeting closureStine Bosse

    Watch the moment

  10. GMT+1

    Committee on Public Health Ordinary meeting Joint meeting Committee on Industry, Research and Energy Joint SANT-ITRE meeting

    Second Q&A round: impact assessment, enforcement and coordination of health files

    In a second exchange, MEPs press for an impact assessment of the €10 billion plan, stronger Horizon alignment and Capital Markets Union links, stricter enforcement of pricing and reimbursement timelines, reduced market fragmentation and clearer coordination between the Biotech Act, pharma package and Critical Medicines Act, with the Commissioner outlining planned impact work, enforcement of the Transparency Directive, joint procurement options and measures to support startup ecosystems in all member states.

    In this chapter

    1. Second round MEP questions: funding, enforcement and coordinationNikos Papandreou
    2. Commission: impact timing, enforcement, joint procurement and ecosystemOlivér Várhelyi

    Watch the moment

  11. GMT+1

    Committee on Public Health Ordinary meeting Joint meeting Committee on Industry, Research and Energy Joint SANT-ITRE meeting

    Commission responses: SPC design, ‘Made in Europe’ and SME‑focused finance

    Commissioner Várhelyi replies on rare diseases, the EIB de‑risking pilot, SPC extension as a tradable incentive under strict ‘Made in Europe’ conditions, prevention objectives, ethics and safety safeguards, territorial balance and Hungarian universities, and justifies SPC criteria and impact versus alternative incentive tools.

    In this chapter

    1. Commission: orphan medicines, US‑style pilot and EIB de‑riskingOlivér Várhelyi
    2. Commission: SPC as economic incentive and harmonised rulesOlivér Várhelyi
    3. Commission: ‘Made in Europe’ conditions and prevention focusOlivér Várhelyi

    Watch the moment

  12. GMT+1

    Committee on Public Health Ordinary meeting Joint meeting Committee on Industry, Research and Energy Joint SANT-ITRE meeting

    Co‑rapporteurs and first MEP round: scope, safety, SPC, funding

    Co‑rapporteurs from SANT and ITRE, then MEPs from several groups, welcome the Biotech Act but raise concerns on orphan drugs, rare diseases, internal‑market fragmentation, safety and ethics, SPC design, SME access to finance, biomanufacturing scale‑up, skills, and equal access to EU funds including for Hungarian universities.

    In this chapter

    1. SANT co‑rapporteur (S&D): orphan drugs, rare diseases, and fundingStine Bosse
    2. ITRE co‑rapporteur: strategic biotech sector and key questionsWouter Beke
    3. EPP (SANT/ITRE): Made in Europe, safety and capital marketsIngeborg Ter Laak

    Watch the moment

  13. GMT+1

    Committee on Public Health Ordinary meeting Joint meeting Committee on Industry, Research and Energy Joint SANT-ITRE meeting

    Opening and Commission presentation on EU Biotech Act

    The Chair opens the joint SANT–ITRE meeting, sets out the procedure and places the European Biotech Act within the wider health package, followed by Commissioner Várhelyi’s strategic presentation on global biotech competition, clinical trials, AI, and the planned €10 billion EIB Biotech EU investment programme.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening of joint SANT–ITRE meeting and agendaStine Bosse
    2. Commission: global biotech shift and EU health packageOlivér Várhelyi
    3. Commission: clinical trials, AI, and financing via EIBOlivér Várhelyi

    Watch the moment

  14. GMT+1

    Committee on Public Health Ordinary meeting

    Exposome Q&A: concepts, policy and closing

    MEPs question Professor Vermeulen on the added value of the exposome concept versus One Health, implications of mixture effects for EU chemicals and health policy, funding and data needs, the role of AI and digital twins, and communication to citizens, with emphasis on prevention returns and reducing inequalities; the Chair then formally closes the exposome exchange and announces a break before the joint ITRE–TRAN meeting with Commissioner Vălean.

    In this chapter

    1. Q&A: Clergeau: exposome vs One Health and cocktail effectsChristophe Clergeau
    2. Q&A: funding, data gaps, AI and communication to citizensMargarita de la Pisa Carrión
    3. Chair: exposome session close and break announcementStine Bosse

    Watch the moment

  15. GMT+1

    Committee on Public Health Ordinary meeting

    STOA exposome session: introduction and expert presentation

    The Chair opens the STOA ‘Excellence in Health Sciences’ exposome session and introduces Professor Vermeulen, who presents the exposome concept, its implications for shifting EU prevention and regulatory paradigms, the need for integrated data infrastructures and large cohorts, and the potential health, inequality‑reduction and productivity gains from a ‘human exposome moonshot’ and dedicated exposome data space.

    In this chapter

    1. Introduction to STOA exposome session (Excellence in Health Sciences)Stine Bosse
    2. Professor Vermeulen: exposome concept and need for paradigm shift
    3. Exposome mission, inequalities and economic caseStine Bosse

    Watch the moment

  16. GMT+1

    Committee on Public Health Ordinary meeting

    Commission input and next steps on rare diseases

    The Commission details the current legal and policy framework, the role and challenges of European Reference Networks, new pharmaceutical and Critical Medicines Act tools, research funding and data initiatives, and signals openness to Parliament’s input, after which the rapporteur closes by urging a strong regulation and the Chair announces the amendment deadline and transition to the next agenda item.

    In this chapter

    1. Commission: existing EU framework and tools for rare diseasesStine Bosse
    2. Rapporteur closing remarks and amendment deadlineNicolás González Casares

    Watch the moment

  17. GMT+1

    Committee on Public Health Ordinary meeting

    Political groups: positions on EU Rare Disease Action Plan

    MEPs from EPP, the Left, Renew and PFE outline their positions on a coherent EU‑level rare disease framework, addressing late diagnosis, inequalities, research gaps, data infrastructure, newborn screening, genomic profiling, economic and regulatory incentives for orphan medicines, and the balance between EU action and national competences, with the Chair also linking the file to the Biotech Act and pharma package.

    In this chapter

    1. Shadows (EPP, Left): support for EU-level rare disease regulationElena Nevado del Campo
    2. Renew and PFE: regulation vs directive, newborn screening, incentivesBilly Kelleher
    3. Chair (Renew): national competence, Biotech Act and data poolingStine Bosse

    Watch the moment

  18. GMT+1

    Committee on Public Health Ordinary meeting

    Committee opening and rare disease mandate

    The Chair opens the SANT meeting, announces the new rapporteur for an EMPL opinion on psychosocial risks, and introduces the draft legislative own‑initiative report on an EU Rare Disease Action Plan, followed by the rapporteur’s presentation of the proposed EU regulation, key objectives on diagnosis, ERNs, data, research, patient involvement and funding needs.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening of meeting and rapporteur appointmentStine Bosse
    2. Rapporteur: EU Rare Disease Action Plan frameworkNicolás González Casares

    Watch the moment

  19. GMT+1

    Committee on Public Health Ordinary meeting

    MEP questions, expert responses and workshop close

    MEPs question EU competence, incentives, HTA, data standards and screening for rare diseases, followed by an expert panel on ORPHA coding, interoperability, newborn screening and EU‑level guidance, and concluding with the formal closure of the SANT workshop and announcement of next steps.

    In this chapter

    1. Market authorisation, incentives and MEP questions on EU competenceMarie-Luce Brasier-Clain
    2. Expert panel: data coding, regulation and screeningTilly Metz
    3. Closing of SANT workshop and next stepsAdam Jarubas

    Watch the moment

  20. GMT+1

    Committee on Public Health Ordinary meeting

    Rare disease workshop: data infrastructure and clinical burden

    The workshop is opened in the context of Parliament’s upcoming own‑initiative report on an EU rare disease action plan, with experts detailing the European rare disease data ecosystem and then presenting the clinical, socio‑economic burden and case for EU‑level criteria on genomic newborn screening and a binding rare disease plan.

    In this chapter

    1. Workshop opening and rare disease data ecosystemTilly Metz
    2. Clinical burden, newborn screening and political prioritiesTilly Metz

    Watch the moment

  21. GMT+1

    Committee on Public Health Ordinary meeting

    Cardiovascular strategy, health funding and pharma deal

    Committee members examine extensive amendments to the EU cardiovascular disease strategy, debate the design and budget of a health window within the European Competitiveness Fund, then receive a trilogue debrief on the Critical Medicines Act, vote pilot health projects and formally approve the inter‑institutional agreement on the pharmaceutical package.

    In this chapter

    1. Cardiovascular disease strategy: amendments and Commission planAdam Jarubas
    2. European Competitiveness Fund: health window and budgetAdam Jarubas
    3. Medicines legislation and health project approvalsAdam Jarubas

    Watch the moment

  22. GMT+1

    Committee on Public Health Ordinary meeting

    Impact of unilateral sanctions on health access

    MEPs raise concerns that unilateral sanctions obstruct access to medicines, medical equipment and hygiene products, citing UN and academic evidence, and propose a dedicated committee debate and engagement with WHO to address humanitarian exemptions.

    In this chapter

    1. Unilateral sanctions and global access to medicines
    2. Proposal for committee debate on sanctions and humanitarian aidStine Bosse

    Watch the moment

  23. GMT+1

    Committee on Public Health Ordinary meeting

    Any other business: sanctions and access to medicines

    After closing the hearing item, the Chair gives the floor for a statement highlighting how unilateral sanctions can restrict access to medicines and medical supplies and proposing a SANT committee debate on reconciling sanctions with humanitarian and health obligations.

    In this chapter

    1. Closing of hearing item and introduction of sanctions and health statementStine Bosse
    2. Sanctions, access to medicines and proposal for SANT debateStine Bosse

    Watch the moment

  24. GMT+1

    Committee on Public Health Ordinary meeting

    World Hearing Day exchange: hearing loss as EU public health priority

    Experts brief MEPs on the prevalence, clinical and economic burden of hearing loss, low uptake of hearing devices and the HERE manifesto for an EU hearing health strategy, followed by questions on prevention, devices and inequalities, discussion of integrated sensory strategies and minimum EU‑level measures, and experts’ closing remarks on adult screening and future policy support.

    In this chapter

    1. World Hearing Day item: introduction of experts and topicStine Bosse
    2. Hearing loss prevalence and disability burden in EU and globally
    3. Clinical impacts of hearing loss: isolation, depression and cognition

    Watch the moment

  25. GMT+1

    Committee on Public Health Ordinary meeting

    World Hearing Day exchange and call for EU hearing strategy

    Experts brief MEPs on the burden and comorbidities of hearing loss in the EU, present the HERE manifesto for an EU hearing health strategy, and answer questions on prevention, screening, inequalities in access and the design of a minimum EU package, stressing integrated lifelong care, levelling up national practices and the need to treat hearing loss as a public health priority ahead of forthcoming Lancet recommendations.

    In this chapter

    1. World Hearing Day: introduction and expert profilesStine Bosse
    2. Burden of hearing loss in EU and comorbidities
    3. Call for EU hearing health strategy: HERE manifestoStine Bosse

    Watch the moment

  26. GMT+1

    Committee on Public Health Ordinary meeting

    Opinion on gender inequalities in health: scope and political inputs

    The rapporteur outlines the opinion’s priorities on integrating sex and gender in research, training and AI/medical devices, while MEPs from multiple groups call for an EU women’s health strategy, better recognition of underdiagnosed conditions, informed consent and balanced contraceptive responsibility, and the Chair and rapporteur set additional priorities and procedural next steps.

    In this chapter

    1. Rapporteur (Martins): scope and priorities of opinion on gender inequalities in healthCatarina Martins
    2. EPP & S&D: call for EU women’s health strategy and broader disease coverageSirpa Pietikäinen
    3. Patriots & Renew: informed consent, underdiagnosed syndromes and contraceptive responsibilityMargarita de la Pisa Carrión

    Watch the moment

  27. GMT+1

    Committee on Public Health Ordinary meeting

    Gender inequalities in health and women’s health strategy

    The rapporteur presents the draft opinion on gender inequalities in health, highlighting biases in research, training, AI and medical devices, while MEPs across groups call for an EU women’s health strategy, national plans, sex‑specific research and better diagnosis and care for under‑recognised conditions, before the chair and rapporteur close by underlining systemic male‑default bias and broad political support for stronger EU action.

    In this chapter

    1. Gender inequalities in health: draft opinion presentedStine Bosse
    2. Women’s health strategy: first political reactionsSirpa Pietikäinen
    3. Broader agenda on women’s health and data gapsMargarita de la Pisa Carrión
    4. Chair and rapporteur close gender health debateStine Bosse

    Watch the moment

  28. GMT+1

    Committee on Public Health Ordinary meeting

    ECA follow‑up, political priorities and cancer plan Q&A

    The auditor answers MEPs’ questions on inequalities, funding cuts and monitoring needs, while MEPs reiterate core political messages on stable financing, governance and innovation access, and engage in a Q&A on HPV vaccination targets, future budget and prevention, followed by the ECA’s closing remarks and the Commission’s response to the audit.

    In this chapter

    1. ECA replies: inequalities, funding cuts and monitoring needs
    2. EPP (Nevado de Campo): core political messages on funding, governance, inequalitiesStine Bosse
    3. EPP (Telepizza): coordination, impact measurement and innovation accessMargarita de la Pisa Carrión

    Watch the moment

  29. GMT+1

    Committee on Public Health Ordinary meeting

    First political reactions: funding, access and governance of cancer plan

    MEPs from several groups respond to the audit, focusing on inequalities in access to modern therapies, the EU4Health budget cut and next MFF, transparency on EU funds, fragmentation of tools and governance risks, and delayed tobacco legislation and prevention measures.

    In this chapter

    1. EPP (Alukovits): access to modern cancer therapies and EU role on pricingStine Bosse
    2. Lithuanian MEP: €1 billion cut and MFF funding risksVytenis Povilas Andriukaitis
    3. Patriots (Castillo): use of EU funds, monitoring and Commission responsibilityStine Bosse

    Watch the moment

Schedule

  1. Replay

    Watch the replay

  2. Replay

    Watch the replay

  3. Replay

    Watch the replay

  4. Replay

    Watch the replay

  5. Replay

    Watch the replay

  6. Replay

    Watch the replay

  7. Replay

    Part 1Part 2

  8. Replay

    Watch the replay

  9. Replay

    Watch the replay

  10. Replay

    Watch the replay

  11. Replay

    Watch the replay

  12. Replay

    Watch the replay

  13. Upcoming
    Committee on Public Health - Ordinary meeting
  14. Upcoming
    Committee on Public Health - Ordinary meeting
  15. Upcoming
    Committee on Public Health - Ordinary meeting

Who spoke at the committee

  • Adam Jarubas 24 sittings
  • Stine Bosse 20 sittings
  • Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis 19 sittings
  • Tomislav Sokol 15 sittings
  • András Tivadar Kulja 11 sittings
  • Aurelijus Veryga 11 sittings
  • Catarina Martins 10 sittings
  • Christophe Clergeau 10 sittings
  • Gerald Hauser 10 sittings
  • Tilly Metz 10 sittings
  • Vlad Vasile-Voiculescu 10 sittings
  • Marie-Luce Brasier-Clain 9 sittings
  • Nicolás González Casares 9 sittings
  • Elena Nevado del Campo 8 sittings
  • Ignazio Roberto Marino 8 sittings
  • Margarita de la Pisa Carrión 8 sittings
  • Ondřej Dostál 8 sittings
  • Martin Häusling 7 sittings
  • Laurent Castillo 6 sittings
  • Nikos Papandreou 6 sittings
  • Bartosz Arłukowicz 5 sittings
  • Oliver Schenk 5 sittings
  • Olivér Várhelyi 5 sittings
  • Peter Agius 5 sittings
  • Peter Liese 5 sittings
  • Tiemo Wölken 5 sittings
  • Victor Negrescu 5 sittings
  • Christine Anderson 4 sittings
  • Jessica Polfjärd 4 sittings
  • Leire Pajín 4 sittings

Where these transcripts come from

European Parliament broadcasts the sittings of the Committee on Public Health (SANT). Polyfact shows each one live, keeps it as a replay with its transcript and links its key moments to the second they were said.

47 sittings on Polyfact since 14 May 2025

Polyfact records and transcribes the sittings and committee hearings of European Union's parliaments. A speaker is named only once their identity is confirmed, by the official record or by a person; automatic guesses are left out.

Every committee

Questions

How can I watch the Committee on Public Health (SANT) live?

On Polyfact, free and without an account: a sitting on air is marked live in the schedule above, and each sitting stays available as a replay.

Is it free?

Yes. Watching the sittings on Polyfact is free and needs no account. A Polyfact subscription, which you can try for free, adds the full transcripts as soon as they are ready, search across every sitting and alerts on your topics.

Where is the transcript of the Committee on Public Health (SANT)?

On each sitting's page on Polyfact, speaker by speaker, with its key moments one click from the second they were said. The search on this page covers the sittings held more than two weeks ago.

Follow every committee without searching

With a Polyfact plan you read every sitting as soon as it is transcribed, ask questions to the video assistant and get an alert as soon as your topics come up.

14-day free trial. A card is required, nothing is charged for 14 days, and you can cancel anytime.

Updated