MEPs debate the REGF report linking better regulation to competitiveness, burden reduction and social and climate standards, before questioning Council and Commission on the planned European Research Area Act, focusing on fragmentation, mobility, investment gaps and the creation of a genuine single market for research.
The President opens the sitting, confirms procedural matters and agenda despite contested requests, then moves to the presentation and full political debate on the revised EP–Commission Framework Agreement covering Parliament’s quasi‑initiative powers, accountability tools and institutional balance.
MEPs from sectoral committees present their opinions on adapting performance indicators and DNSH rules before final political remarks on EU competences, with the Chair closing the joint meeting and requesting written follow‑up from the Commission.
Co‑rapporteurs, shadows and other MEPs question ECA and Commission on EU added value, simplification, indicator gaps and overlaps, DNSH legal basis and timing, climate and gender tracking, and audit and control powers, prompting detailed methodological and legal clarifications.
Chairs open the joint BUDG–CONT meeting, adopt the agenda and minutes, and frame the session around the new performance regulation with initial ECA assessment and Commission reply on the proposed single horizontal framework.
Ivanova details the Court’s concrete recommendations on governance and legal structure, the Commission defends its proposal while accepting to re‑insert key agricultural provisions into CAP law and strengthen crisis‑preparedness tools, and the rapporteurs and chair conclude that Parliament must substantially rework the CAP package before the chair formally closes the meeting and announces the next AGRI sessions.
MEPs and national MPs present national measures, legal gaps and differing views on regulation, anonymity, resource allocation and engagement of men and boys, stressing democracy and human‑rights stakes; panelists respond on security risks, risks of authoritarian overreach and the need for feminist tech governance and public infrastructure, before EIGE and the Chair close with key takeaways, consent and youth research, and practical next steps for the EU’s work on digital violence against women.
The Chair steers the discussion to platform responsibilities, with Microsoft detailing AI‑amplified deepfake pornography, the StopNCII partnership and the need to align corporate practice with EU law, followed by EIGE’s evidence on cyber‑harassment and its impact on women’s participation in democracy, linking survey data to demands for stronger platform accountability, remedies and prevention measures.
CAP and CMO rapporteurs and shadows from multiple groups respond to the ECA opinion, warning of reduced predictability, de facto renationalisation, legal and budgetary uncertainty, risks for market measures and sectoral schemes, and highlighting specific concerns on environmental ambition, outermost regions and food security under the proposed framework.
The chair introduces the Court of Auditors’ assessment of the Commission’s CAP architecture, and ECA Member Ivanova presents concerns about the loss of a dedicated CAP fund, rising complexity, fragmentation and weak traceability, while also noting potential benefits of greater flexibility and performance‑based implementation if matched by clearer rules and controls.
The rapporteur and shadows question the DGs on key budgetary, staffing, IT, energy and communication choices for 2027, the DGs provide detailed clarifications on financial assumptions, contracts, lifecycle choices and communication tools, and the rapporteur and Chair conclude the work on the estimates and announce the follow-up in the Budgets and CONT committees.
After recalling her own online attacks, the Chair convenes a panel of experts: a Polish journalist on coordinated cyberbullying and gendered disinformation driving women from public life, a former Georgian MP on gender narratives as hybrid warfare and an EU enlargement security issue, and an academic who characterises technology‑facilitated gender‑based violence as structural and proposes feminist, survivor‑centred regulatory priorities.
Rapporteur Knotek defends the committee’s role in strengthening control and transparency within the ECF and invites amendments; the Chair then formally closes the debate, announces the amendment deadline (9 March, 14:00) and the committee vote date (15 April), and reminds members of the upcoming joint budget committee meeting.
A left-group MEP criticizes the ECF’s core logic of de-risking private investment with public money, warns that merging 14 funds and allowing intra-fund flexibility undermines democratic budgetary control, and asks how Parliament can prevent the Commission from shifting resources and eroding its budgetary authority.
Shadow rapporteurs stress the need to simplify applications and reporting without weakening transparency, highlight support for innovation, SMEs and financial instruments, and refer to the European Court of Auditors’ opinion while calling for strong roles for OLAF, EPPO and ECA through targeted amendments.
The Commission representative explains the structural competitiveness challenge, the consolidation of 14 programmes into the ECF, its directly managed and selection-based nature, simplification via a single rulebook and gateway, use of financing not linked to costs with safeguards, and the relationship with cohesion instruments for addressing territorial disparities.
The Chair links EU debates to external policy and invites UN Women Brussels, which outlines shrinking civic space, global trends of online violence against women in politics and media, under‑reporting and weak remedies, highlights EU legislation as a reference, and analyses transnationally funded anti‑rights movements while urging stronger EU accountability, multilateralism and feminist partnerships in key external instruments.
Rapporteur Ondřej Knotek outlines the Budgetary Control Committee’s focus on transparency, governance and evaluation, flags weaknesses in geographical balance, technical assistance and reporting, and presents his amendments on OLAF/EPPO/ECA competences, third-country obligations, and safeguards for financing not linked to costs.
The Chair resumes the meeting on the 2027 EP draft estimates and invites DG FINS, DG INLO, DG ITEC and DG COMM to present overall budget trends, buildings and SPAAK renovation, IT and cybersecurity priorities, and communication budget constraints and projects.
The Chair reopens the meeting, introduces the agenda item on the draft opinion to ITRE regarding the European Competitiveness Fund, outlines its link to defence research and innovation, and explains the speaking order between rapporteur, Commission and shadows.
The chair and Commission outline the urgent amendment to the organic regulation following the Herbaria ruling, detailing trade‑equivalence extensions, logo rules and simplifications; the rapporteur and MEPs then debate equivalence, reciprocity, market access and logo credibility, with the Commission and rapporteur closing on data‑driven, fast‑track work and limited, targeted amendments.
The Chair introduces the Commissioner for Equality, who presents the new Gender Equality Strategy and details EU legislative and enforcement tools against online and technology‑facilitated violence, including the Violence Against Women Directive, DSA obligations and the European Democracy Shield, with emphasis on national transposition and education on consent and stereotypes.
The committee votes on the remaining amendments (including compromise amendments and blocks of identical amendments), then proceeds to the final roll‑call vote adopting the opinion on the digital omnibus on AI, after which the Chair congratulates members, notes there is no AOB, announces the next Brussels meeting in March, and closes the session.
The committee votes amendment by amendment starting with 62, including a compromise amendment and several checks by electronic vote (notably on amendments 65, 102 and 103), deciding on the core modifications to the draft CULT opinion on the digital omnibus.
The Chair presents the opinion on the Commission’s digital omnibus proposal amending the AI Act, stressing time pressure and the importance of AI literacy, after which the rapporteur outlines support for the text but warns against weakening key safeguards, defends maintaining deployers’ obligations on AI literacy, opposes implementation delays, and calls for clear labelling of AI‑generated content and formally approved codes of practice.
The chair opens the AGRI meeting, adopts the agenda, and the rapporteur presents the committee’s stance against a 20% CAP cut before members vote on all amendments and adopt the opinion on the 2028–2034 MFF, confirming Parliament’s position on future CAP funding.
Switching to English for voting, the Chair conducts a test vote to verify the system, then reads the list of MEPs replaced by substitutes and confirms that the committee will vote on the sole agenda item: the opinion on the digital omnibus on AI.
Mme Nela RIEHL opens the extraordinary CULT committee meeting, confirms adoption of the agenda and previous minutes, announces available interpretation, webstreaming, and a coordinated decision deemed approved, and recalls rules on physical presence and proxy voting under Article 216(7) EP Rules as well as the cancelled ministers’ meeting.
Formal opening of the joint FEMM meeting for International Women’s Day, adoption of the agenda, explanation of speaking rules and logistics, and initial political framing of democracy, women’s rights and rising digital violence, leading into President Metsola’s institutional message on the new EU directive and online abuse.
The committee opens the meeting, hears the Commission’s detailed €350m Emergency Aid Reserve transfer proposal, records political support and concerns over reserve sustainability and bundled crises, receives the Commission’s replies on early reserve use and future mobilisations, and then proceeds to and completes the vote on the 2027 budget guidelines (Commission section).
EC press point and signing ceremony by European Commissioner Ekaterina ZAHARIEVA and Australian Minister of Industry and Innovation Tim AYRES on Australia’s association to Horizon Europe
Committee on Budgetary Control Ordinary meeting CONT Committee meeting
Upcoming
Committee on European Democracy Shield (special committee) (EUDS)
Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Ordinary meeting
Upcoming
Committee on Housing Crisis (special committee) (HOUS)
Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union Ordinary meeting
Upcoming
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE)
7th Inter-Parliamentary Committee Meeting On Evaluation Of The European Union Agency For Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) Activities
Upcoming
Committee on European Democracy Shield (special committee) (EUDS)
Issues raised by bot farming and social media anonymity in elections
Every committee
European Parliament, European Council and European Commission broadcast their sittings. Polyfact shows each one live, keeps it as a replay with its transcript and links its key moments to the second they were said.
How can I watch European Union parliamentary committees live?
On Polyfact, free and without an account: a sitting on air is marked live in the schedule above, and each committee below has its own page with its latest sittings.
Is it free?
Yes. Watching the sittings on Polyfact is free and needs no account. A Polyfact subscription, which you can try for free, adds the full transcripts as soon as they are ready, search across every sitting and alerts on your topics.
Where are the transcripts?
On each sitting's page on Polyfact, speaker by speaker, with its key moments one click from the second they were said.
Follow every committee without searching
With a Polyfact plan you read every sitting as soon as it is transcribed, ask questions to the video assistant and get an alert as soon as your topics come up.
14-day free trial. A card is required, nothing is charged for 14 days, and you can cancel anytime.