Committee on Fisheries Ordinary meeting
Hearing Q&A: MEP concerns, stakeholder input and Commission reply
MEPs question experts on aligning science with fishers’ observations, integrating socio‑economic assessments into TACs, closures and CFP reforms, while stakeholders criticise the dominance of biological indicators and impacts on fleets and coastal communities; the Commission outlines existing socio‑economic data and modelling tools and offers further dialogue before the Chair closes the item and adjourns the meeting.
In this chapter
- Le Callennec: aligning scientific surveys with fishers’ observationsIsabelle Le Callennec
- Millán Mon: demand for socio-economic data in TACs, quotas and area closuresFrancisco José Millán Mon
- Lupo: linking fisheries, blue economy and coastal area strategiesGiuseppe Lupo
- Jamet: critique of EU epistemology and partial indicators in fisheries policyFrance Jamet
- France JAMET: questioning biomass indicators and stock assessment toolsFrance Jamet
- Italian MEP: impact of CFP on Italian fleet and EMFAF underuse
- Eric SARGIACOMO (S&D): integrating socio-economic data in CFP decisionsEric Sargiacomo
- Carlo CICCIOLI (ECR): criticism of environmental focus and fleet declineCarlo Ciccioli
- External experts panel: socio-economic data needs and coastal community context
- Industry representative: socio-economic indicators, biological closures and coastal communities
- DG MARE (Ángel Calvo Santos): Commission explanation on socio-economic data and tools
- Chair: closing of agenda item and announcement of next meetings