European Union

How to watch European Union parliamentary committees

Every sitting is free to watch on Polyfact, live and on replay, no account needed.

Latest updates

What is said in the sittings, update by update, the latest first. Each update opens the video at the second it was said.

  1. GMT+2

    Committee on Budgets (BUDG)

    Commission clarifications and procedural closure

    Shadow rapporteur and Commission justify the new tasks, staffing levels and fee–budget balance, explain handling of EMA building costs and future updates to financial statements, and the Chair sets amendment and vote deadlines and adjourns the meeting.

    In this chapter

    1. Shadow Schenk and Commission: justification of tasks, staffing and feesOliver Schenk
    2. Chair: procedural closure and next budget deadlinesJanusz Lewandowski

    Watch the moment

  2. GMT+2

    Committee on Budgets (BUDG)

    Political groups’ positions on EMA resources and fees

    Political group representatives express support or opposition to reinforcing EMA and Commission staffing, debate the limits of redeployments, scrutinise the proposed fee structure and long‑term building costs, and raise subsidiarity and national sovereignty concerns about shifting costs to taxpayers and centralising databases.

    In this chapter

    1. EPP shadow Schenk: support for EMA reinforcementOliver Schenk
    2. S&D (for Lupo): conditional support and fee concerns
    3. PfE MEP Furet: attack on EMA funding and subsidiarityAngéline Furet
    4. NI MEP Geisel: questions on extra posts and EU budget costsThomas Geisel

    Watch the moment

  3. GMT+2

    Committee on Budgets (BUDG)

    EMA and medical devices reform: budget, fees and subsidiarity

    The standing rapporteur and committee shadows assess the budgetary impact of strengthening the European Medicines Agency under the MDR/IVDR revision, addressing new posts, redeployments and the balance between EU budget and fees, with broad support for better patient access but sharp criticism from PfE on increased taxpayer funding, Eudamed centralisation and use of delegated acts; members then exchange on why additional EMA posts are needed in a reform presented as simplification and on how stronger EU‑level scientific support can both speed approvals and preserve national competences.

    In this chapter

    1. EMA and medical devices reform: budgetary assessmentHélder Sousa Silva
    2. Rapporteur Schenk and S&D shadow: support with fee concernsOliver Schenk
    3. PfE criticism: EMA funding, Eudamed and subsidiarityAngéline Furet
    4. Geisel’s questions and Schenk’s reply on posts and bureaucracy

    Watch the moment

  4. GMT+2

    Committee on Budgets (BUDG)

    Chair opens EMA/medical devices budget item

    The Chair closes the EGF cases and opens the EMA/medical devices and IVDR file, while the rapporteur presents the budgetary impact, staffing needs, and fee–EU budget balance for the proposed mandate revision.

    In this chapter

    1. Chair: closure of EGF files; introduction of EMA/medical devices dossierJanusz Lewandowski
    2. Rapporteur Sousa Silva: budgetary assessment for EMA mandate revisionHélder Sousa Silva

    Watch the moment

  5. GMT+2

    Committee on Budgets (BUDG)

    EGF cases and Belgian applications: political scrutiny

    Members debate three European Globalisation Adjustment Fund cases, with Furet and Geisel criticising EU policies they see as destroying jobs, questioning Belgium’s high number of applications, the eligibility of the Cora retail case and the share of funds going directly to workers versus services, while the Commission defends the regulatory basis, explains Belgian over‑representation and details the mandatory split between cash allowances and active labour measures before the Chair closes the files and announces amendment and vote deadlines.

    In this chapter

    1. Three EGF cases: Furet’s political critique and red lineAngéline Furet
    2. EGF Belgium: Geisel questions Belgian frequency, sector fit and direct benefitsThomas Geisel
    3. Commission: EGF Belgium over‑representation and aid breakdownLenka Filipkova

    Watch the moment

  6. GMT+2

    Committee on Budgets (BUDG)

    EGF cases for Finland, Spain and Belgium: presentations and group positions

    Rapporteurs and shadows present the Finnish Valmet Automotive, Spanish Galicia automotive and Belgian Cora retail restructuring EGF applications, detailing worker numbers, EU co‑financing levels, planned up‑/reskilling and reintegration measures, and political group views on the EGF’s complementary role, labour‑market implications and amendment and vote timetable.

    In this chapter

    1. EGF Finland: rapporteur presents Valmet Automotive caseRasmus Andresen
    2. EGF Finland: EPP and S&D positions on worker support limitsHélder Sousa Silva
    3. EGF Spain (Galicia automotive): rapporteur and EPP shadowNils Ušakovs
    4. EGF Belgium (Cora retail restructuring): rapporteur and S&DHélder Sousa Silva

    Watch the moment

  7. GMT+2

    Committee on Budgets (BUDG)

    EGF mobilisations for Finland, Spain, Belgium: cases, political positions and Commission Q&A

    The committee assesses three EGF applications for redundancies at Valmet Automotive (Finland), in Galicia’s automotive sector (Spain) and in Cora retail stores (Belgium), with rapporteurs and groups broadly supportive but stressing EGF’s limits versus national labour policies, while critical voices link job losses to EU policies and question Belgian over‑representation; Commission services justify eligibility criteria, clarify the effects of online retail and explain the spending split between direct allowances and active labour market measures.

    In this chapter

    1. EGF Finland (Valmet Automotive): case presentationJanusz Lewandowski
    2. EGF Finland: political groups’ positionsJanusz Lewandowski
    3. EGF Spain (Galicia automotive): case and supportNils Ušakovs

    Watch the moment

  8. GMT+2

    Committee on Budgets (BUDG)

    EEAS and ECHA building projects: early warnings

    Members examine two early warning files: the EEAS New Delhi delegation lease expiry and potential €750,000 threshold crossing, and ECHA’s ‘Building 2030’ project in Helsinki linked to evolving tasks, hybrid work and future premises needs, with concerns about delayed preparation and a request to revisit once more concrete data are available.

    In this chapter

    1. EEAS New Delhi delegation lease: early warningOlivier Chastel
    2. ECHA Helsinki premises: Building 2030 early warningJanusz Lewandowski

    Watch the moment

  9. GMT+2

    Committee on Budgets (BUDG)

    Committee voting and EP building policy files

    The Chair conducts a brief voting session on the Global Europe regulation, a 2026 budget transfer and the Pole Star building, then moves to early information files on the Brussels B5/2026 project, the New Delhi EEAS delegation lease renewal and the ECHA Helsinki premises ‘Building 2030’ planning, outlining timelines, budgetary thresholds and alignment with the Commission’s property strategy.

    In this chapter

    1. Voting session: Global Europe regulation, budget transfer and Pole Star decision
    2. Building policy case 2: early information on Brussels B5/2026Olivier Chastel
    3. EEAS New Delhi delegation: lease renewal constraints and timingOlivier Chastel
    4. ECHA Helsinki premises: 2030 lease expiry and early warningOlivier Chastel

    Watch the moment

  10. GMT+2

    Committee on Budgets (BUDG)

    Administrative budgets: EESC transfer and Pole Star building

    Members examine the EESC’s internal transfers to bolster communication, social media and external staff, with MEPs contesting the added‑value of such spending, before turning to the Commission’s long‑term usufruct arrangement for the Pole Star building, where the rapporteur and several MEPs query delays, density, financial terms and use of buffer space, and the OIB defends the project’s operational synergies and loan‑financed fit‑out under constrained annual appropriations.

    In this chapter

    1. Transfer for EESC: communication budget and external staffNils Ušakovs
    2. Pole Star building: rapporteur questions and critical MEP interventionsOlivier Chastel
    3. Commission/OIB: buffer space, synergies and loan financing for Pole StarSari Lehkonen

    Watch the moment

  11. GMT+2

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (FEMM)

    AI and gender: EPRS evidence and Members’ reactions

    After the Chair hands over to EPRS, its expert presents research on AI’s gendered opportunities and risks, including documented bias in AI systems, deepfakes, online violence, economic discrimination, health data gaps and privacy concerns around femtech. Members then react with questions and comments on rural women’s access and protection, AI’s implications for democracy and Parliament’s work, and the need to address gender‑based online and political violence within broader institutional debates on AI governance.

    In this chapter

    1. Chair transition to EPRS input on AI and genderLina Gálvez
    2. EPRS (Bentzen) I: Opportunities and early evidence of AI gender bias
    3. EPRS (Bentzen) II: Deepfakes, LLM bias, femtech data and economic impactNaja Bentzen
    4. Members’ reactions: rural access, democracy, and gendered online violence

    Watch the moment

  12. GMT+2

    Committee on Budgets (BUDG)

    DEC 11/2026: Connectivity for Peace and Chernobyl

    The Chair reorders the agenda to introduce transfer DEC 11/2026, and the Commission details the proposed redeployment from macro‑financial assistance grants to finance the Connectivity for Peace package in the South Caucasus and urgent Chernobyl repairs, followed by MEPs’ questions on the sharp budget increase, geopolitical rationale and financing structure, and the Commission’s justifications on EBRD‑led co‑funding and use of unused MFA appropriations.

    In this chapter

    1. Resumption of meeting and introduction of DEC 11/2026
    2. Commission: justification of transfer for Connectivity for Peace and Chernobyl repairsLenka Filipkova
    3. Chernobyl repairs and Connectivity for Peace: MEP concerns and Commission replyAndrzej Halicki

    Watch the moment

  13. GMT+2

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (FEMM)

    Gender Mainstreaming Network: opening and Commission on AI and gender

    The Gender Mainstreaming Network meeting is opened with procedural points, announcements on European Gender Equality Week and the annual gender mainstreaming report, and the introduction of a thematic exchange on gender equality and artificial intelligence. The Commission’s AI Office then outlines women’s underrepresentation in AI and ICT, details EU skills and education initiatives to increase women’s participation, and explains how the AI Act aims to prevent discriminatory AI outcomes while calling for coordinated action across stakeholders to close the gender gap in AI.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening of Gender Mainstreaming Network and announcementsDainius Žalimas
    2. Commission (Sioli) I: Women’s underrepresentation in AI and skills gap
    3. Commission (Sioli) II: EU skills, education and support programmes
    4. Commission (Sioli) III: AI Act, bias risks and call for coordinated action

    Watch the moment

  14. GMT+2

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (FEMM)

    CSW71 item: political groups’ positions and ideological divide

    Political groups respond to the draft CSW71 report, with S&D backing the substance but questioning rapporteur neutrality, Patriots for Europe attacking what they see as an ideological gender agenda and costs, and Renew, Greens and The Left pushing for strong language on SRHR, climate, violence, participation and funding for women’s organisations. ESN and feminist MEPs clash over motherhood, STEM quotas and the scope of gender equality policies, before the rapporteur and Chair close by defending the process, clarifying budget figures and calling for a strong, common EU line towards the Council and at CSW.

    In this chapter

    1. S&D: content support and concern over rapporteur neutralityJoanna Scheuring-Wielgus
    2. Patriots for Europe criticism and Chair’s budget clarificationMargarita de la Pisa Carrión
    3. Renew, Greens, Left: SRHR, climate, participation and funding at CSW71Dainius Žalimas
    4. ESN and feminist counter-arguments; rapporteur closingIrmhild Boßdorf

    Watch the moment

  15. GMT+2

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (FEMM)

    CSW71 draft report: political group positions and closing

    Political groups present contrasting views on the draft CSW71 report, with S&D, Renew, Greens and The Left seeking ambitious language on poverty, climate, SRHR and violence, while conservative members criticise the gender agenda and emphasise motherhood; the rapporteur and chair close by defending the process and calling for a unified Parliament line for New York.

    In this chapter

    1. S&D (Scheuring‑Wielgus): content priorities and concern on rapporteur choiceJoanna Scheuring-Wielgus
    2. Patriots for Europe (De la Pisa): critique of gender agenda and EU spendingMargarita de la Pisa Carrión
    3. Renew, Greens, Left: support with focus on SRHR, climate and online violenceLina Gálvez

    Watch the moment

  16. GMT+2

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (FEMM)

    CSW71 EU priorities: mandate and rapporteur presentation

    The chair introduces the draft report on EU priorities for the 71st UN Commission on the Status of Women, and the rapporteur outlines the strategic focus on women’s economic autonomy, decent work, STEM skills and green/digital transitions, stressing implementation tools, data and the EU’s role in shaping a credible common position.

    In this chapter

    1. Introduction to CSW71 EU priorities and mandateLina Gálvez
    2. Rapporteur Princi: strategic focus on economic autonomy and transitionsGiusi Princi
    3. Rapporteur Princi: implementation tools and EU roleGiusi Princi

    Watch the moment

  17. GMT+2

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (FEMM)

    CSW71 item: introduction and rapporteur priorities

    The Chair opens agenda item 5 on EU priorities for the 71st UN Commission on the Status of Women and gives the floor to rapporteur Giusi Princi, who sets out Parliament’s proposed priorities on women’s economic independence, social protection, digital and green transitions, and gender‑responsive climate and disaster policies. She stresses data, monitoring and strong involvement of Parliament and civil society in shaping a unified EU position for CSW71 in New York.

    In this chapter

    1. Chair: introduction to CSW71 draft reportLina Gálvez
    2. Rapporteur Princi: priorities for EU position at CSW71Giusi Princi

    Watch the moment

  18. GMT+2

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (FEMM)

    FEMM meeting opening and VET opinion vote

    The FEMM committee opens its meeting, adopts the agenda and minutes, and proceeds through all voting blocks on the gender‑equality‑focused opinion on boosting skills and vocational education and training, including compromises, individual amendments and the final roll‑call vote.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening of FEMM meeting and agenda adoptionLina Gálvez
    2. Opinion on VET skills: substitutions and first voting blockLina Gálvez
    3. Opinion on VET skills: remaining amendments and final voteLina Gálvez

    Watch the moment

Schedule

  1. Live
    Council of the European Union

    European Political Community - 1 - International Summit

    Watch live

  2. Live
    Plenary sittings

    Plenary Session

    Watch live

  3. Replay
    European Commission

    European Commissioner Andrius KUBILIUS in Italy

    Watch the replay

  4. Replay
    Plenary sittings

    Plenary Session

    Watch the replay

  5. Replay
    European Commission

    College read-out / Press conference (with international sign language) by European Commission Executive Vice-President Henna VIRKKUNEN and Commissioner Michael McGRATH on the Digital Fairness Act and a Consumer enforcement initiative

    Watch the replay

  6. Replay
    European Commission

    College read-out / Press conference by European Commission Executive Vice-President Henna VIRKKUNEN and Commissioner Michael McGRATH on the Digital Fairness Act and a Consumer enforcement initiative

    Part 1Part 2Part 3Part 4

  7. Replay
    European Commission

    European Commission President Ursula von der LEYEN in Antalya, Türkiye for the COP31

    Part 1Part 2Part 3

  8. Replay
    European Commission

    European Commissioner Dan JØRGENSEN in Antalya, Türkiye for the COP31

    Part 1Part 2Part 3Part 4

  9. Replay
    European Commission

    European flags at half-mast following the dramatic accident on the Trakia motorway in the area of Yambol, in Bulgaria

    Watch the replay

  10. Replay
    European Commission

    European Commissioner Andrius KUBILIUS at the UARM Hub Launch: From Frontline Innovation to European Defence Readiness

    Watch the replay

  11. Replay
    Committee on Constitutional Affairs (AFCO)

    Committee on Constitutional Affairs Ordinary meeting

    Watch the replay

  12. Replay
    Committee on Security and Defence (SEDE)

    Committee on Security and Defence Ordinary meeting

    Watch the replay

  13. Upcoming
    Committee on Budgetary Control (CONT)

    Committee on Budgetary Control Ordinary meeting CONT Committee meeting

  14. Upcoming
    Committee on European Democracy Shield (special committee) (EUDS)

    Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Ordinary meeting

  15. Upcoming
    Committee on Housing Crisis (special committee) (HOUS)

    Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union Ordinary meeting

  16. Upcoming
    Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE)

    7th Inter-Parliamentary Committee Meeting On Evaluation Of The European Union Agency For Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) Activities

  17. Upcoming
    Committee on European Democracy Shield (special committee) (EUDS)

    Issues raised by bot farming and social media anonymity in elections

Every committee

European Parliament, European Council and European Commission broadcast their sittings. Polyfact shows each one live, keeps it as a replay with its transcript and links its key moments to the second they were said.

European Parliament

European Council

European Commission

Questions

How can I watch European Union parliamentary committees live?

On Polyfact, free and without an account: a sitting on air is marked live in the schedule above, and each committee below has its own page with its latest sittings.

Is it free?

Yes. Watching the sittings on Polyfact is free and needs no account. A Polyfact subscription, which you can try for free, adds the full transcripts as soon as they are ready, search across every sitting and alerts on your topics.

Where are the transcripts?

On each sitting's page on Polyfact, speaker by speaker, with its key moments one click from the second they were said.

Follow every committee without searching

With a Polyfact plan you read every sitting as soon as it is transcribed, ask questions to the video assistant and get an alert as soon as your topics come up.

14-day free trial. A card is required, nothing is charged for 14 days, and you can cancel anytime.

Updated