How to watch the House Appropriations

Funding Lapses: Analyzing Shutdown Reform

Mid‑hearing focus: automatic CR design, constitutional limits, and member ‘pain’

Bonnie Watson Coleman Democratic

Discussion turns to the risks that multi‑year automatic CRs would underfund dynamic programs, potential conflicts with the Constitution’s two‑year army clause, and the way shutdowns and CRs expand executive discretion, while supporters of Lankford’s bill emphasize rolling short CRs, restrictions on member travel and floor activity, and the need to impose tangible costs on Congress rather than federal workers.

In this chapter

1. Mid‑hearing focus: auto‑CR underfunding risks and member responsibilityBonnie Watson Coleman
2. Constitutional and defense concerns: army clause and executive leverage
3. Support for Lankford bill and mechanics of congressional ‘pain’
4. Executive behavior, OMB budgeting, and local project funding

Watch the moment Share

Funding Lapses: Analyzing Shutdown Reform

Early Q&A: budget process, Senate rules, and shutdown incentives

Michael Simpson Republican

Members question witnesses on chronic late budgets, absent budget resolutions, and Senate filibuster constraints, probing the constitutionality of statute‑based Senate procedure changes, the political will for regular order, and how automatic CRs, filibuster rules, and apportionment authority shape incentives for presidents, congressional minorities, and appropriators.

In this chapter

1. Initial Q&A: deadlines, budget process, and Senate rules
2. Early member questions: filibuster, political will, and regular orderMichael Simpson
3. Presidential role, auto‑CR incentives, and apportionment authority

Watch the moment Share

Funding Lapses: Analyzing Shutdown Reform

Opening, Article I framing, and witness proposals

The chair and ranking member open the full Appropriations Committee hearing by framing shutdowns as failures of Congress’s Article I duties and debating permanent automatic CRs, then introduce Senator Lankford, Rep. McClintock, and former OMB Director Young, who lay out competing proposals on automatic CRs, Senate cloture reform, and strengthening congressional capacity and appropriations practice.

In this chapter

1. Chair Cole: hearing opens and Article I framing
2. Ranking Member: opposition to permanent automatic CRs
3. Witness panel introduced: Lankford, McClintock, Young

Watch the moment Share

Fiscal Year 2027 Defense Bill

Republican en bloc policy riders and post-recess security funding disputes

Veronica Escobar Democratic

Republicans adopt an en bloc package adding conservative policy riders and authorizing a symbolic renaming of the Department of Defense, after which the committee reconvenes from recess to address targeted industrial base items, the ‘Golden Dome for America’ missile defense fund, and Democratic efforts to constrain or defund Trump’s Iran war and related reconstruction payments, which do not succeed.

In this chapter

1. Republican en bloc: policy riders and ‘Department of War’ renamingVeronica Escobar
2. Post-recess: industrial base, Golden Dome and Iran war limitationsVeronica Escobar

Watch the moment Share

Fiscal Year 2027 Defense Bill

Manager’s amendment and early issue-specific amendments

Veronica Escobar and 1 other

The committee adopts a bipartisan manager’s amendment with technical and commemorative provisions, then considers a series of amendments on AI-related savings versus battleship funding, the DC National Guard ‘Safe and Beautiful’ mission, applying standard appropriations guardrails to reconciliation funds, preventing politicization of federal grants, restoring Ukraine Security Assistance, and preserving U.S. force posture in Europe, all of which are ultimately rejected or withdrawn.

In this chapter

1. Manager’s amendment: technical fixes and commemorative provisionsVeronica Escobar
2. McCollum amendment: $1B AI savings vs battleship advance procurementBetty McCollum
3. McCollum amendment: end DC Guard ‘Safe and Beautiful’ missionVeronica Escobar

Watch the moment Share

Fiscal Year 2027 Defense Bill

Opening, bill framework and topline debate

Veronica Escobar Democratic

The chair opens the FY2027 Defense Appropriations markup, Subcommittee leadership outlines the bill’s topline and priorities, and majority and minority members frame the central dispute: historic defense increases and modernization needs versus deep offsets from domestic and international accounts, Ukraine funding gaps, and concerns over Iran, DC Guard missions, and long-term war costs.

In this chapter

1. Opening: Defense FY27 markup convened
2. Calvert: bill overview, topline and modernization
3. McCollum: support for troops, opposition to offsets

Watch the moment Share

Fiscal Year 2027 Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Bill and the Fiscal Year 2027 Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Bill

Post-recess amendments: tribal land, Trump ballroom, water affordability and environmental justice

Mark Pocan and 3 others

After recess, amendments address adding Miccosukee Osceola Camp lands, blocking funding for a Trump White House ballroom, and restoring or studying EPA support for water affordability, state revolving funds, and environmental justice programs, highlighting partisan divides over presidential projects, fiscal constraints, and disparate health impacts before most proposals are rejected.

In this chapter

1. Miccosukee Osceola Camp: tribal land protection attemptMark Pocan
2. Pocan amendment: block funding for Trump White House ballroomMark Pocan
3. Water affordability and environmental justice: SRFs and EJ amendmentsMichael Simpson

Watch the moment Share

Fiscal Year 2027 Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Bill and the Fiscal Year 2027 Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Bill

Initial amendments: Trump projects, EPA, oversight, water, Forest Service

Michael Simpson and 3 others

Simpson’s bipartisan manager’s amendment is adopted, then members debate targeted amendments on a proposed Trump triumphal arch, a deep additional cut to EPA state grants, oversight of the Kennedy Center, dedicated West Virginia drinking water funding, and a temporary freeze on Forest Service facility closures, with several roll-call defeats and negotiated withdrawals after oversight commitments.

In this chapter

1. Manager’s amendment: technical and CSB funding adjustmentsMichael Simpson
2. Pingree amendment: ban on Trump triumphal arch (debate and vote)Michael Simpson
3. Clyde amendment: deeper cut to EPA state categorical grantsMichael Simpson

Watch the moment Share

Fiscal Year 2027 Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Bill and the Fiscal Year 2027 Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Bill

Opening: agenda, bill overview, partisan stakes

Michael Simpson and 3 others

The chair opens full committee markup, sets the schedule for completing the Interior–Environment bill, and recognizes Subcommittee Chair Simpson, followed by majority and minority leadership framing the bill’s funding priorities and ideological divides before members lay out specific concerns on parks, tribal programs, EPA, cultural institutions, and regional projects.

In this chapter

1. Opening of markup: agenda and timeline
2. Subcommittee Chair Simpson: Interior bill overviewMichael Simpson
3. Ranking openings: Pingree, Cole, DeLauro set partisan lines
4. Members’ statements: parks, Great Lakes, heritage tourism, artsHarold Rogers

Watch the moment Share