Language
U.S. House of Representatives
Every sitting is free to watch on Polyfact, live and on replay, no account needed.
Latest update 110 days ago
What is said in the sittings, update by update, the latest first. Each update opens the video at the second it was said.
“Building an AI-Ready America: How AI Is Creating Opportunities Across America's Workforce”
The Ranking Member and Chair close by stressing that AI-driven growth must respect workers, communities, and property and environmental rights, positioning AI as vital to national strength while committing to further hearings to develop bipartisan, responsible AI policy.
In this chapter
“Building an AI-Ready America: How AI Is Creating Opportunities Across America's Workforce”
Representative Wilson focuses on U.S.-China competition and regional cooperation, exploring how AI agents can raise shop-floor productivity, optimize specialty crop production under land constraints, and improve cancer detection and recovery through advanced imaging tools.
In this chapter
“Building an AI-Ready America: How AI Is Creating Opportunities Across America's Workforce”
Representative McBath elicits explanations of FDA-regulated clinical AI, distinctions between clinical and administrative tools, and the need for continuous monitoring, while pressing for worker consultation and safeguards against biased algorithmic management that harms job security and service quality.
In this chapter
“Building an AI-Ready America: How AI Is Creating Opportunities Across America's Workforce”
The Chair questions witnesses on AI’s role in designing biomanufacturing cell factories, modernizing agriculture careers, and expanding healthcare workforce capacity by reducing administrative burden, mitigating burnout, and creating new implementation and regulatory roles.
In this chapter
“Building an AI-Ready America: How AI Is Creating Opportunities Across America's Workforce”
Witnesses from biomanufacturing, farming, organized labor, and healthcare detail how AI reshapes production and supply chains, responds to an aging agricultural workforce, intensifies workplace monitoring and bias risks, and augments clinicians through documentation, imaging, and predictive tools.
In this chapter
“Building an AI-Ready America: How AI Is Creating Opportunities Across America's Workforce”
The Chair and Ranking Member open the field hearing in Augusta, frame AI’s economic and social implications, contrast flexible innovation-focused regulation with concerns about inequality, surveillance, and data centers, and complete procedural steps including record-keeping and introduction of witnesses.
In this chapter
In a series of postponed votes, the committee formally reports all ten measures, largely on party lines except for the bipartisan MATCH and Fit Future Acts, disposes of outstanding Democratic amendments on AI, fitness, franchising, and union governance, adopts one technical amendment to the predator access bill, and authorizes technical corrections and filing of additional or dissenting views.
Debate turns to codifying a narrow joint‑employer test for franchises and expanding disqualifications for union and labor‑relations roles to sex offenders against minors, as Republicans seek liability certainty for franchisors and stronger union safeguards while Democrats highlight wage theft, child labor, and perceived double standards, with Democratic PRO Act–style and symbolic amendments defeated before advancing both bills’ ANS versions.
In this chapter
The committee weighs defining locum tenens clinicians as independent contractors under labor laws and restricting OSHA’s ability to finalize a national heat standard, with supporters citing rural access and regulatory burdens and opponents warning of misclassification, loss of worker rights, and preventable heat deaths, before adopting Republican ANS language in both cases over Democratic objections and failed substitute standards.
In this chapter
Members advance a bipartisan MATCH Act pilot to modernize workforce data, debate codifying and directing the President’s fitness council with equity‑focused amendments, and clash over the VEST Act’s exclusion of RSUs from overtime calculations, with Republicans prioritizing flexibility and parity and Democrats warning of weakened wage protections.
In this chapter
The committee considers Rep. Miller’s Parents Opt‑in Protection Act to tighten consent for sensitive student surveys and Rep. Owens’ K‑12 AI Literacy Act to clarify AI‑related uses of federal funds, with Democrats stressing data, equity, and privacy impacts while Republicans stress parental control and flexible AI training, ultimately adopting both ANS texts despite failed Democratic amendments.
In this chapter
Members debate defining sex as biological under Title IX, with Republicans emphasizing women’s sports and single‑sex spaces and Democrats warning of lost protections for transgender students and harms to LGBTQ+ youth, before adopting Rep. Miller’s amendment in the nature of a substitute and advancing the bill.
In this chapter
The chair and ranking member set quorum, outline the ten education and workforce bills, and stake out partisan priorities and concerns that frame subsequent debates on civil rights, worker protections, data, and regulation.
In this chapter
Members examine moving family engagement programs to HHS and Indian education and tribal higher-ed and job-training programs to Interior amid strong Democratic and stakeholder opposition, then Walberg recesses the committee with all requested roll-call votes on the ten bills postponed.
The committee turns to bills relocating most higher education grant programs and core ESEA K–12 functions to the Department of Labor, as Republicans argue for workforce alignment and against perceived DEI politicization, while Democrats raise alarms over staff cuts, civil-rights enforcement, MSIs, GAO oversight, and school voucher and OMB rule provisions through a series of unsuccessful amendments.
In this chapter
Members debate moving foreign gift reporting and international education programs from Education to State and shifting foreign medical school accreditation and campus-based child care to HHS, with Republicans emphasizing national security and subject-matter expertise and Democrats warning of politicization, fragmentation of higher education functions, and harm to student-parents.
In this chapter
The committee considers shifting the entire federal student aid portfolio to Treasury, as Republicans argue FSA mismanagement and Democrats warn of Treasury’s lack of expertise, prior failed pilots, servicing chaos, and seek delay and GAO- and borrower-protection conditions through rejected amendments.
In this chapter
Members debate transferring Career, Technical, and Adult Education to the Department of Labor, with Republicans citing a proof of concept and Democrats pointing to payment delays, added costs, stakeholder opposition, and failed oversight safeguards in Democratic amendments.
In this chapter
Chairman Walberg outlines procedures and frames the ten-bill package as a first step toward dismantling the Department of Education, while Ranking Member Scott sets out Democrats’ overarching objections on equity, capacity, and federal responsibility.
In this chapter
“Training Activists, Not Physicians: The Impact of DEI on Medical Schools”
Members examine how NIH funding and proposed HR1 loan limits affect research capacity, physician-scientist pipelines and service in underserved areas, while Republicans attack DEI as ideological capture influencing faculty composition and curriculum. Democrats emphasize real-world crises like rural shortages and Medicaid cuts, defend DEI as necessary for culturally competent care, and the ranking member and chair close with competing narratives on whether DEI and OCR enforcement protect or endanger educational quality, patient safety and lawful use of federal funds.
In this chapter
“Training Activists, Not Physicians: The Impact of DEI on Medical Schools”
Republican members intensify challenges around abortion, gender-affirming care and terminology such as “pregnant people,” question compliance with Trump-era DEI restrictions and federal guidance on transgender treatments, and press deans on biological definitions and admissions practices. Democratic members counter by justifying teaching on colonialism and Black Panther health activism, reaffirming DEI as scientifically grounded training for diverse populations, and highlighting structural racism, historic abuses and ongoing racial health disparities, while antisemitism responses and pregnancy language become flashpoints.
In this chapter
“Training Activists, Not Physicians: The Impact of DEI on Medical Schools”
Members probe whether medical schools comply with race-neutral admissions after Supreme Court and state bans, scrutinize discontinued DEI-related courses for ideological content versus evidence-based medicine, and contrast this with arguments that DEI and social determinants training are essential for patient care. The discussion also introduces physician shortages, HR1 graduate-loan caps and disability and maternal health disparities as policy risks to workforce diversity and access to care.
In this chapter
“Training Activists, Not Physicians: The Impact of DEI on Medical Schools”
The chair and ranking member set opposing frames on antisemitism, DEI and OCR enforcement, procedural rules are established, and the four academic and professional witnesses present their institutional missions, DEI approaches, curriculum changes and responses to antisemitism. This segment defines the legal, political and institutional context for subsequent oversight on medical education and federal funds.
In this chapter
The committee debates expanding ERISA plan fiduciaries’ access to detailed health‑claims data, weighing transparency for plan oversight against risks to worker privacy and discrimination, rejects a Democratic amendment to restore prior bipartisan guardrails, and concludes with recorded votes adopting substitutes and ordering all 11 bills reported.
In this chapter
Members advance largely bipartisan measures on interstate professional licensure data‑sharing, expanding nurse practitioner and physician‑assistant authority for energy workers, FECA earnings data access and provider fraud suspension, and then take up a contested bill directing BLS to collect AI‑related workforce data despite concerns over funding and duplication with Census efforts.
In this chapter
The committee turns to student‑association bills on single‑sex social organizations and religious student groups, with sharp partisan conflict over defining sex as biological, protections for transgender students, and whether religious clubs may bypass campus nondiscrimination rules, as Democratic amendments to narrow these protections are rejected.
In this chapter
Members consider three K–12 and higher‑education bills on antisemitism, BDS, and Title VI transparency, debating the IHRA‑style definition, constitutional and civil‑rights implications, institutional boycotts of Israel, and oversight of OCR and DOJ, including failed Democratic amendments on outsourcing and funding protections.
In this chapter
The chair opens the markup, outlines the agenda and scope of the 11‑bill package, hears the Ranking Member’s framing of areas of support and opposition, and sets procedural rules before formally calling up the first bill for consideration.
In this chapter
The final segment highlights SFUSD’s algebra, ethnic studies, literacy, and budget reforms, sharp questioning of CPS and Loudoun over FERPA, Title IX, gender-related curriculum, and locker-room discipline, and concluding remarks where the ranking member stresses legal obligations to accommodate transgender students while the chair defends the hearing’s focus on parental rights and perceived ideological overreach in schools.
In this chapter
Members scrutinize GOP culture-war bills and their potential conflicts with Title VI and Title IX, interrogate district responses to student civic actions and parent activism labels, assess NAEP data and the impact of dismantling federal research capacity, and probe controversies over field trips, bathroom incidents, condoms, ‘white supremacy culture’ trainings, segregation trends, and chronic underfunding of IDEA amid escalating student mental-health needs.
In this chapter
The search covers the sittings held more than two weeks ago. A Polyfact subscription searches every sitting as soon as it is transcribed.
U.S. House of Representatives broadcasts the sittings of the House Education and Workforce. Polyfact shows each one live, keeps it as a replay with its transcript and links its key moments to the second they were said.
27 sittings on Polyfact since 5 February 2025
Polyfact records and transcribes the sittings and committee hearings of United States's parliaments. A speaker is named only once their identity is confirmed, by the official record or by a person; automatic guesses are left out.
On Polyfact, free and without an account: a sitting on air is marked live in the schedule above, and each sitting stays available as a replay.
Yes. Watching the sittings on Polyfact is free and needs no account. A Polyfact subscription, which you can try for free, adds the full transcripts as soon as they are ready, search across every sitting and alerts on your topics.
On each sitting's page on Polyfact, speaker by speaker, with its key moments one click from the second they were said. The search on this page covers the sittings held more than two weeks ago.
With a Polyfact plan you read every sitting as soon as it is transcribed, ask questions to the video assistant and get an alert as soon as your topics come up.
14-day free trial. A card is required, nothing is charged for 14 days, and you can cancel anytime.
Updated
'%20d='m0%200%2016%2011h61%2061%2061%2061%2060L47%2037h61%2061%2060%2061L16%2063h61%2061%2061%2061%2060L47%2089h61%2061%2060%2061L16%20115h61%2061%2061%2061%2060L47%20141h61%2061%2060%2061L16%20166h61%2061%2061%2061%2060L47%20192h61%2061%2060%2061L16%20218h61%2061%2061%2061%2060z'/%3e%3c/svg%3e)