Language
U.S. House of Representatives
Every sitting is free to watch on Polyfact, live and on replay, no account needed.
Latest update 56 days ago
What is said in the sittings, update by update, the latest first. Each update opens the video at the second it was said.
“Who Gets the Scholarship? How the Global Shift in College Sports Affects Americans”
Rep. Scott questions whether limiting international athletes meaningfully addresses the broader student debt crisis, and closing remarks from Adams and Owens contrast priorities between tackling affordability and oversight versus advancing the TEAM USA Act and cultural concerns about college sports professionalization.
In this chapter
“Who Gets the Scholarship? How the Global Shift in College Sports Affects Americans”
Members Harris, Bonamici, Moylan, and Kiley examine public awareness of international dominance, the role of recruiting agencies and extra eligibility, criticism of focusing on athlete caps over affordability, hardships from the end of the SAVE plan and move to RAP, and how percentage caps and transparency could rebalance opportunities while preserving international participation.
In this chapter
“Who Gets the Scholarship? How the Global Shift in College Sports Affects Americans”
Rep. Grijalva challenges the premise that international athletes are the problem, reframing the issue as college affordability and oversight failures, then probes Ament on systematic Public Service Loan Forgiveness miscounts and the need for accountability at Federal Student Aid.
In this chapter
“Who Gets the Scholarship? How the Global Shift in College Sports Affects Americans”
Early questioning covers tennis as a warning case, coaching incentives and proposed foreign‑athlete caps under the TEAM USA Act, and Adams’s focus on Grad PLUS, graduate access, and the lived realities of loan default and collections, followed by Chair Walberg’s defense of roster caps and criticism of loan forgiveness.
In this chapter
“Who Gets the Scholarship? How the Global Shift in College Sports Affects Americans”
Witnesses McEnroe, Brown, Ament, and DePeppe detail the dominance of international athletes in certain sports, impacts on U.S. athletes and small colleges, and parallel problems of tuition inflation, student debt, and weakened federal oversight of higher‑education programs.
In this chapter
“Who Gets the Scholarship? How the Global Shift in College Sports Affects Americans”
Chair Owens frames concerns about international athletes displacing U.S. students and weakening Team USA, while Ranking Member Adams defends international students, highlights college affordability and student aid rollbacks, and Owens then formalizes procedures and introduces the witness panel.
In this chapter
“Workforce Rewired: Modern Apprenticeships for a Modern Economy”
The ranking member and chair summarize areas of agreement on the value of registered apprenticeships, stress the need for greater federal investment, job quality, and portability across states, highlight legislation like the MATCH Act, and call for continued bipartisan work before adjourning the hearing.
“Workforce Rewired: Modern Apprenticeships for a Modern Economy”
Members examine registered building-trades systems and portability, compare apprenticeship degree outcomes with traditional transfers, explore local tailoring and veteran pathways, debate sustainable incentives and intermediary roles beyond short-term grants, and review DOL’s quality enforcement and expanded accountability metrics for apprenticeships across sectors.
In this chapter
“Workforce Rewired: Modern Apprenticeships for a Modern Economy”
Discussion turns to sectoral focus and scaling bottlenecks in healthcare and other fields, critiques of new DOL guidance on duration and approval timelines, and proposals to expand SMART Defense Education eligibility so CTE, apprenticeship, and credential programs can address workforce and cybersecurity gaps in places like Guam.
In this chapter
“Workforce Rewired: Modern Apprenticeships for a Modern Economy”
Members probe how technician shortages affect consumers, how apprenticeship degrees could reshape higher education, the anti-poverty potential of teacher and non-construction apprenticeships, the effects of PLAs and state rules on non-union access and ratios, and how the Fitzgerald Act and national standards safeguard quality and portability.
In this chapter
“Workforce Rewired: Modern Apprenticeships for a Modern Economy”
Members question witnesses on how young people should weigh college debt against paid apprenticeships, the role of academic credit for work, cultural misconceptions about apprenticeships, the impact of canceled grants and weak DOL guidance, and how to expand access and equity through HBCUs and degree-connected models.
In this chapter
“Workforce Rewired: Modern Apprenticeships for a Modern Economy”
Witnesses from Caliber Collision, Reach University, Jobs for the Future, and Independent Electrical Contractors detail industry skills gaps, registered apprenticeship models, apprenticeship degrees, technology-enabled training, and group sponsorship, and call for flexible incentives and a clearer national apprenticeship framework.
In this chapter
“Workforce Rewired: Modern Apprenticeships for a Modern Economy”
The chair and ranking member set the economic and political context for apprenticeships versus four-year degrees, outline procedural rules, and formally introduce the four witnesses representing employers, intermediaries, and apprenticeship degree providers.
In this chapter
"Building an AI-Ready America: Higher Education in the Age of AI"
The final exchanges address K–12 AI literacy legislation, secure early access and foundational skills, mechanisms for sharing best practices and data-protection standards across institutions, AI-enabled access in remote territories, human dignity in AI-shaped work, and bipartisan closing statements stressing transparency, civil rights, and competitiveness priorities.
In this chapter
"Building an AI-Ready America: Higher Education in the Age of AI"
Members press witnesses on the dismantling of federal ed‑tech capacity, discriminatory AI outcomes, responsibility for vendor and institutional practices, the role of internships and human oversight, ideological bias in AI systems, and the need for multi-institutional research on AI’s mental-health and cognitive impacts on students.
In this chapter
"Building an AI-Ready America: Higher Education in the Age of AI"
Questioning centers on embedding AI as a core professional competency, regulatory environments that enable experimentation, concerns about cognitive stunting and over-reliance, and institutional policies to prevent outsourcing thinking while still ensuring students develop workplace-ready AI fluency and ethical judgment.
In this chapter
"Building an AI-Ready America: Higher Education in the Age of AI"
Members question witnesses on university–industry AI partnerships, ed‑tech integration, digital divides for HBCUs and under-resourced campuses, AI‑native institutional redesign, and the potential of AI tools to support writing, remediation, and scalable personalized learning rather than replacing core academic work.
In this chapter
"Building an AI-Ready America: Higher Education in the Age of AI"
Witnesses from Florida State, McGraw Hill, the University Innovation Alliance, and Harvard/Michael Horn present initial positions on AI as a national competitiveness issue, the AI proficiency gap, coordination and equity for under-resourced institutions, and the need to redesign higher education models, accreditation, and infrastructure around AI.
In this chapter
"Building an AI-Ready America: Higher Education in the Age of AI"
The chair and ranking member frame AI in higher education as both an innovation opportunity and a regulatory challenge, outline concerns about weakened federal oversight, and formally open the record while introducing the witness panel and procedural rules for the hearing.
In this chapter
The search covers the sittings held more than two weeks ago. A Polyfact subscription searches every sitting as soon as it is transcribed.
U.S. House of Representatives broadcasts the sittings of the House Education and Workforce Subcommittee on Higher Education and Workforce Development. Polyfact shows each one live, keeps it as a replay with its transcript and links its key moments to the second they were said.
11 sittings on Polyfact since 5 March 2025
Polyfact records and transcribes the sittings and committee hearings of United States's parliaments. A speaker is named only once their identity is confirmed, by the official record or by a person; automatic guesses are left out.
On Polyfact, free and without an account: a sitting on air is marked live in the schedule above, and each sitting stays available as a replay.
Yes. Watching the sittings on Polyfact is free and needs no account. A Polyfact subscription, which you can try for free, adds the full transcripts as soon as they are ready, search across every sitting and alerts on your topics.
On each sitting's page on Polyfact, speaker by speaker, with its key moments one click from the second they were said. The search on this page covers the sittings held more than two weeks ago.
With a Polyfact plan you read every sitting as soon as it is transcribed, ask questions to the video assistant and get an alert as soon as your topics come up.
14-day free trial. A card is required, nothing is charged for 14 days, and you can cancel anytime.
Updated
'%20d='m0%200%2016%2011h61%2061%2061%2061%2060L47%2037h61%2061%2060%2061L16%2063h61%2061%2061%2061%2060L47%2089h61%2061%2060%2061L16%20115h61%2061%2061%2061%2060L47%20141h61%2061%2060%2061L16%20166h61%2061%2061%2061%2060L47%20192h61%2061%2060%2061L16%20218h61%2061%2061%2061%2060z'/%3e%3c/svg%3e)