U.S. House of Representatives

How to watch the House Armed Services

Every sitting is free to watch on Polyfact, live and on replay, no account needed.

Latest updates

Latest update 160 days ago

What is said in the sittings, update by update, the latest first. Each update opens the video at the second it was said.

  1. EDT

    Service academy admissions and force fitness standards

    Mace advances amendments to hard-code test-heavy service academy admissions metrics and require acceptance of the Classic Learning Test, sparking concern these measures entrench bias and underweight leadership and non-test attributes, yet they pass narrowly. Higgins’s amendment to codify age-normed, sex-neutral fitness standards across combat roles raises fears of being used to sideline women and non-combat specialists, but is adopted on a recorded vote despite commitments to pursue a more tailored alternative.

    In this chapter

    1. Mace admissions amendments: academy metrics and CLT testMike Rogers
    2. Fitness standards and women in combat: Higgins vs HoulahanMike Rogers

    Watch the moment

  2. EDT

    Base politicization, religious neutrality, and military media independence

    Democrats offer multiple amendments to prohibit partisan activity and merchandise on bases, codify and update DOD political neutrality and religious-neutrality rules, and protect Stars and Stripes leadership and its ombudsman from political interference, citing recent rallies and Christian-nationalist rhetoric. Republicans argue existing law and First Amendment protections are sufficient and resist statutory insulation of internal media, leading to defeat of these governance and neutrality proposals.

    In this chapter

    1. Politicization and religion in DOD: base speech, neutrality, Stars and StripesMike Rogers
    2. Late bundle of social and media governance votesMike Rogers

    Watch the moment

  3. EDT

    Middle East operations and Israel defense integration

    Moulton and allies force debate over Operation Epic Fury against Iran, demanding full cost transparency and questioning the legality and strategy of the undeclared war, while the chair defends it as necessary to degrade Iranian capabilities; related transparency amendments are defeated. Khanna’s attempt to strip Section 224 on U.S.–Israel defense tech integration, framed around Gaza conduct and legal concerns, is rejected as a coalition of Democrats and Republicans argue the provision mainly coordinates and builds on existing co-development programs.

    In this chapter

    1. Iran war cost and transparency: Moulton and allies vs chairMike Rogers
    2. Khanna amendment: strip Section 224 on U.S.–Israel tech integrationMike Rogers

    Watch the moment

  4. EDT

    Programmatic and governance amendments: ships, munitions, DEI, JAG roles

    Members contest specific program and governance issues: Smith’s bid to remove funding for a proposed ‘Trump-class’ battleship, Jacobs’s effort to ban cluster munition transfers, and her proposals for combatant command human rights offices and a Stars and Stripes ombudsman all fail on recorded votes. Jackson’s attempted ban on lab-grown meat for troops, Mace’s DEI-targeted ‘merit-only’ personnel amendments, and Crow’s effort to restrict JAGs from civilian law-enforcement roles showcase broader culture-war and civil–military boundary disputes, with mixed outcomes but most changes ultimately rejected or narrowly adopted.

    In this chapter

    1. Smith amendment to kill ‘Trump-class’ battleship fundingMike Rogers
    2. Jacobs amendment: ban transfer of cluster munitionsRobert Wittman
    3. Jacobs amendments: human rights offices and Stars and Stripes ombudsmanMike Rogers

    Watch the moment

  5. EDT

    Chairman’s mark and topline funding clash

    The committee adopts large consensus en bloc amendments to the chairman’s mark before entering a sustained partisan clash over the $1.15T topline, with Smith pressing for tax increases to pay for the bill and others defending debt-financed defense. Moulton’s amendment to cut $150B from the topline triggers an extended debate on war costs, innovation versus legacy systems, and domestic tradeoffs, before being rejected on a recorded vote.

    In this chapter

    1. Chairman’s mark: consensus en blocs, then fiscal clash over toplineMike Rogers
    2. Moulton amendment: cut topline by $150B: debate on wars and debtMike Rogers

    Watch the moment

  6. EDT

    Subcommittee marks adopted: capabilities, readiness, personnel

    All six subcommittees present and secure adoption of their bipartisan marks, covering air and land forces, nuclear and space systems, shipbuilding and sealift, cyber and AI, readiness and depots, and military personnel and SOF. Key themes include major aircraft and ship programs, artillery and munitions production, nuclear modernization, AI governance, depot and right-to-repair reforms, end strength and pay raises, childcare, and boosted SOCOM funding and ISR governance.

    In this chapter

    1. Tactical Air and Land Forces mark: airpower, drones, artilleryRobert Wittman
    2. Strategic Forces mark: nuclear modernization, space, Golden Dome doubtsMike Rogers
    3. Seapower and Projection Forces mark: subs, ships, and battleship warningMike Rogers

    Watch the moment

  7. EDT

    Markup opening: procedures, agenda, topline context

    The chair and ranking member open the FY27 NDAA markup, set debate and voting rules, and outline competing priorities: a $1.15T topline focused on deterrence and industrial base versus deep concern about fiscal sustainability and reliance on large-scale wars. They clarify jurisdiction, PAYGO and Budget Act constraints, and establish the underlying text and sequence for considering subcommittee marks and amendments.

    In this chapter

    1. Committee convenes: voting and debate rulesMike Rogers
    2. Chairman: NDAA priorities and $1.15T toplineMike Rogers
    3. Ranking member: support for troops, but fiscal alarmMike Rogers
    4. Chair: amendment jurisdiction and markup structureMike Rogers

    Watch the moment

Where these transcripts come from

U.S. House of Representatives broadcasts the sittings of the House Armed Services. Polyfact shows each one live, keeps it as a replay with its transcript and links its key moments to the second they were said.

10 sittings on Polyfact since 26 February 2025

Polyfact records and transcribes the sittings and committee hearings of United States's parliaments. A speaker is named only once their identity is confirmed, by the official record or by a person; automatic guesses are left out.

Every committee

Questions

How can I watch the House Armed Services live?

On Polyfact, free and without an account: a sitting on air is marked live in the schedule above, and each sitting stays available as a replay.

Is it free?

Yes. Watching the sittings on Polyfact is free and needs no account. A Polyfact subscription, which you can try for free, adds the full transcripts as soon as they are ready, search across every sitting and alerts on your topics.

Where is the transcript of the House Armed Services?

On each sitting's page on Polyfact, speaker by speaker, with its key moments one click from the second they were said. The search on this page covers the sittings held more than two weeks ago.

Follow every committee without searching

With a Polyfact plan you read every sitting as soon as it is transcribed, ask questions to the video assistant and get an alert as soon as your topics come up.

14-day free trial. A card is required, nothing is charged for 14 days, and you can cancel anytime.

Updated