European Parliament

How to watch the Committee on Foreign Affairs (AFET)

Every sitting is free to watch on Polyfact, live and on replay, no account needed.

Latest updates

What is said in the sittings, update by update, the latest first. Each update opens the video at the second it was said.

  1. GMT+1

    Committee on Foreign Affairs Ordinary meeting

    North Macedonia: accession conditionality and EU stance

    MEPs, the Commission and the EEAS review the political window for North Macedonia’s accession, underlining the need for constitutional amendments, rule‑of‑law and public administration reforms, anti‑discrimination measures, media freedom safeguards and continued CFSP alignment as prerequisites for moving forward with the fundamentals cluster and deeper integration.

    In this chapter

    1. North Macedonia: opportunity, constitutional amendments and EU diplomacyDavid McAllister
    2. EEAS: final assessment on North Macedonia

    Watch the moment

  2. GMT+1

    Committee on Foreign Affairs Ordinary meeting

    North Macedonia accession: rapporteur and MEP concerns

    The rapporteur and MEPs from key groups outline North Macedonia’s long-standing candidate status, reform progress and remaining rule-of-law gaps, while stressing citizens’ fatigue, constitutional impasse on minority recognition, and risks for regional stability if commitments on the July 2022 conditions, anti-discrimination and judiciary independence are not met. They underline the strategic importance of the country for EU security and credibility, call for depoliticisation, better protection of minorities and media, and insist bilateral disputes must not derail but also cannot be detached from the accession framework.

    In this chapter

    1. North Macedonia: accession deadlock and rapporteur’s overviewDavid McAllister
    2. North Macedonia: EPP and S&D shadows on reforms and EU credibilityDavid McAllister
    3. North Macedonia: regional stability, conditions, minorities and constitutionDavid McAllister

    Watch the moment

  3. GMT+1

    Committee on Foreign Affairs Ordinary meeting

    Albania accession process: 2025 report, reforms and EU priorities

    The AFET committee examines the 2025 report on Albania, with the rapporteur and shadows assessing progress on negotiations, rule of law, corruption, electoral reform, media and environment, alongside concerns over justice, property and misuse of EU funds, before the Commission and EEAS outline key reform priorities and next procedural steps.

    In this chapter

    1. Albania 2025 report: introduction and rapporteur’s assessmentDavid McAllister
    2. Albania: rule of law, corruption and environment in shadows’ viewsDavid McAllister
    3. Albania: minorities, justice system, property and corruption concernsDavid McAllister
    4. Albania: Commission and EEAS priorities and rapporteur wrap‑upDavid McAllister

    Watch the moment

  4. GMT+1

    Committee on Foreign Affairs Ordinary meeting

    EU–India partnership: summit outcomes, FTA and Q&A

    EU–India relations are reviewed from the Delhi summit outcomes and five‑year strategic agenda to detailed discussion of the FTA, security and defence partnership, human‑rights and climate conditionality, followed by MEP questions and EEAS replies on Russian oil, sustainability, migration, derisking from China and implementation tools like the €500m decarbonisation facility.

    In this chapter

    1. EU‑India Summit and FTA: outcomes and strategic agendaDavid McAllister
    2. EU‑India: Ukraine, AI, multilateralism and trilateral cooperation
    3. Parliament and EEAS positions on EU‑India FTA and human rightsDavid McAllister

    Watch the moment

  5. GMT+1

    Committee on Foreign Affairs Ordinary meeting

    Transnational water governance: EU water diplomacy for peace

    The committee turns to a draft recommendation on transnational water governance, with the rapporteur framing water as a human right and conflict factor, shadows stressing scarcity, weaponisation and migration impacts while some caution against EU over‑reach and call for updated international rules, and the rapporteur and chair concluding on treating water as a peace‑policy tool and detailing the amendment and vote timetable before adjournment.

    In this chapter

    1. Chair: introduction to draft recommendation on transnational water governanceDavid McAllister
    2. Rapporteur: water as a right, shared resource and conflict factorLeoluca Orlando
    3. Shadows: water as weapon, sovereignty and international rulesIngeborg Ter Laak
    4. Rapporteur’s closing and procedural timetable on water governance reportLeoluca Orlando

    Watch the moment

  6. GMT+1

    Committee on Foreign Affairs Ordinary meeting

    Transnational repression: EU strategy, political debate and next steps

    Following the closure of the work programme dialogue, the chair opens the item on countering transnational repression as the rapporteur presents a comprehensive EU strategy proposal, political groups debate scope, definitions, instruments, Interpol abuse and national competences, the EEAS outlines existing tools and cooperation, and the rapporteur closes by inviting amendments and highlighting national legal loopholes ahead of the announced procedural timetable.

    In this chapter

    1. Transition: close of work programme dialogue and opening of transnational repression itemDavid McAllister
    2. Rapporteur: defining and structuring an EU strategy against transnational repressionHannah Neumann
    3. Shadows I (EPP, S&D): scope, definition and sanctions credibilityAntonio López-Istúriz White

    Watch the moment

  7. GMT+1

    Committee on Foreign Affairs Ordinary meeting

    Commission reply II: Gaza conditions, Syria, Israel measures and Arab/Gulf role

    The Commissioner links Gaza reconstruction to Hamas disarmament and multilateral UN‑led implementation, explains strict conditionality on Syria funds, notes the draft but delayed Middle East strategy, clarifies that most bilateral cooperation with Israel is frozen pending member‑state decisions on Article 2, and underlines that lasting peace and investment require active Arab and Gulf engagement together with EU‑US coordination and stronger EU unity.

    In this chapter

    1. Commission reply II: transatlantic relations, Gaza conditions and Israel measures
    2. Commission reply II: role of Arab and Gulf states and need for EU unity

    Watch the moment

  8. GMT+1

    Committee on Foreign Affairs Ordinary meeting

    Second round Q&A: Gaza plan, Syria conditionality, Lebanon and regional partners

    Supportive and critical MEPs probe implementation of the 20‑point Gaza peace plan, preferred partners and timelines for reconstruction, people‑to‑people priorities in the Pact for the Mediterranean, conditions and sanctions architecture in the Syria package, Lebanon’s elections and Saudi and Turkish roles, as well as intra‑EU divisions, coordination with Muslim partners and concrete plans for the Mediterranean University and action plan deliverables.

    In this chapter

    1. Second round questions: Gaza peace plan, Syria, Lebanon and Saudi ArabiaDavid McAllister
    2. Second round questions: intra‑EU splits and Mediterranean UniversityDavid McAllister

    Watch the moment

  9. GMT+1

    Committee on Foreign Affairs Ordinary meeting

    Commission reply I: Board of Peace mandate and Pact action plan

    The Commissioner justifies attending the Board of Peace as an observer under UNSC 2803 and diplomatic courtesy, stresses she did not endorse its charter and used the format to advance EU Gaza objectives, and then details the three‑pillar Pact action plan, internal coordination, and strategic engagement with Algeria and Lebanon as part of a broader Mediterranean geopolitical approach.

    In this chapter

    1. Commission reply I: explaining participation in Board of Peace and proposing a stronger EU role
    2. Commission reply I: Pact action plan pillars, Algeria and LebanonDavid McAllister

    Watch the moment

  10. GMT+1

    Committee on Foreign Affairs Ordinary meeting

    Coordinators’ first round: Board of Peace, Tunisia, Algeria, Lebanon, Russia

    Political group coordinators challenge the EU’s participation in Trump’s Board of Peace, question its legality, transparency and impact on the UN system, criticise Israel’s actions in Gaza and the West Bank, and press the Commission on Tunisia’s democratic backsliding, the safety of political refugees, engagement with Algeria and Lebanon, and the need to counter Russian influence and migration routes via Libya and Belarus.

    In this chapter

    1. Coordinators’ first round: Gaza Board of Peace and TunisiaDavid McAllister
    2. Coordinators: doubts on Board of Peace, Algeria, Lebanon, Russia’s roleDavid McAllister
    3. Coordinators and DROI Chair: Israel, human rights conditionality and mandateLeoluca Orlando

    Watch the moment

  11. GMT+1

    Committee on Foreign Affairs Ordinary meeting

    Chair: opening and Commission Middle East workplan

    The chair launches the structured dialogue on the Commission work programme, as the Commissioner outlines the Pact for the Mediterranean, EU engagement on Gaza under UNSC 2803, early recovery and donor coordination for Gaza, and a broad regional tour covering Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, Iran, Iraq, North Africa, the Gulf, Yemen, migration tools and the TMED energy initiative within a wider simplification and enforcement agenda.

    In this chapter

    1. Chair: opening of structured dialogue and Middle East focusDavid McAllister
    2. Commission: Pact for the Mediterranean and upcoming action plan
    3. Commission: Gaza, Board of Peace and EU role under UN SCR 2803

    Watch the moment

  12. GMT+1

    Committee on Foreign Affairs Ordinary meeting Joint meeting Joint committee procedure - AFET and DEVE

    ICC under US sanctions: EU support, blocking statute and autonomy

    Vice‑Chair Hanna Neumann opens an exchange with ICC First Vice‑President Judge Rosario Salvatore Aitala on the Court’s role in a fragmented order; Aitala gives a strongly worded statement linking the ICC and EU to post‑war European values, warning of rising violence and hatred, and describing unprecedented attacks by permanent UN Security Council members, including US sanctions that list ICC judges like criminals and restrict their financial and digital access; MEPs from several groups denounce the US sanctions, press for activation of the EU blocking statute, ask about the EU–ICC cooperation agreement, digital and financial dependence on US providers, possible use of Rome Statute Article 70, and concrete measures to protect Court staff and preserve deterrence; Aitala confirms intensive but confidential contacts with Commission and Council, stresses companies’ over‑compliance and the need for clear political backing and reassurance so European banks and service providers keep working with the Court, recalls the ICC’s complementarity with national jurisdictions and its role as part of Europe’s legal order, and urges continued political, legal and practical support as the Parliament insists the Commission act on the blocking statute and broader strategic autonomy.

    Watch the moment

  13. GMT+1

    Committee on Foreign Affairs Ordinary meeting Joint meeting Joint committee procedure - AFET and DEVE

    Turkey 2025 Commission report: stalled accession vs strategic partnership

    The committee then debates the draft report on Turkey’s 2025 Commission report; rapporteur Nacho Sánchez Amor distinguishes the frozen, value‑based accession track (with continued authoritarian backsliding, political trials, and no progress on the seven remaining visa benchmarks) from the need for a pragmatic, transactional partnership on customs union, security and regional issues, and criticizes the Commission and Council’s public silence on democratic deterioration as damaging for pro‑EU civil society; shadows and other MEPs divide between those urging a tough line or formal end of accession, those pressing to include issues like persecution of minorities, Hamas links, Cyprus occupation and threats in the Eastern Mediterranean, and those emphasizing NATO/security cooperation but clear red lines on rule of law and political prisoners (Imamoğlu, Demirtaş etc.); Commission and EEAS respond that their assessment broadly aligns with Parliament’s, recall repeated calls on Turkey to respect ECtHR rulings and Cyprus’ sovereignty, note low CFSP alignment but some constructive steps (sanctions circumvention, refugee hosting, regional connectivity), and argue for continued selective engagement, after which Sánchez Amor reiterates the need for a louder, public EU stance on democracy and McAllister sets amendment and vote dates.

    Watch the moment

  14. GMT+1

    Committee on Foreign Affairs Ordinary meeting

    Judge Aitala: EU duties and political backing for ICC

    Concluding intervention by Judge Aitala detailing the need for explicit EU political support, protection against overcompliance with foreign sanctions, the complementarity-based duties of EU member states, broader EU obligations to safeguard ICC-related actors, and the shared strategic destiny between the EU and the Court.

    In this chapter

    1. Judge Aitala: EU political support and overcompliance issues
    2. Judge Aitala: complementarity, member state duties and EU obligations
    3. Judge Aitala: shared EU–ICC destiny and staff protection

    Watch the moment

  15. GMT+1

    Committee on Foreign Affairs Ordinary meeting Joint meeting Joint committee procedure - AFET and DEVE

    EU–Switzerland broad agreements package: interim report and institutional views

    McAllister opens item 12 on the broad package of bilateral agreements with Switzerland ("bilateral 3"), explaining that the Council has just approved signature and that Parliament must now prepare its consent; rapporteur Christophe Grudler frames Switzerland as a unique, deeply interdependent but non‑EEA partner, describes the package as a long‑negotiated compromise to stabilize and modernize sectoral agreements (free movement, transport, energy, mobility, research) in a changing geopolitical context, and insists Parliament must scrutinize social protection, fair competition and implementation while voting on the package as a whole; shadows and opinion rapporteurs (IMCO, INTA) generally welcome the draft’s balanced tone, stress preserving the internal market’s integrity, cross‑border regional benefits, Horizon/Erasmus/Interreg participation, and argue for possibly broader trade and investment frameworks and joint WTO reform; Commission and EEAS present the package as a balanced whole bringing legal certainty, new cooperation in electricity and health, a parliamentary committee, and warn that failure to ratify would weaken relations, before Grudler closes by outlining the amendment calendar and the link to Parliament’s eventual consent.

    Watch the moment

  16. GMT+1

    Committee on Foreign Affairs Ordinary meeting

    MEP questions II: Double standards, Israel and EU sovereignty

    MEPs from The Left and francophone groups denounce a two-tier international order and EU hypocrisy on Israel, call for concrete EU measures vis-à-vis the US to protect ICC staff and enforce warrants, and demand a sovereignty-affirming use of the blocking statute before a final question on alliances for the rules-based order closes the round.

    In this chapter

    1. The Left: double standards, Israel and concrete EU steps
    2. Demandes en français: activation du statut de blocage
    3. Souveraineté européenne, dignité et Commission inerte
    4. Alliances for rules-based order and final questions

    Watch the moment

  17. GMT+1

    Committee on Foreign Affairs Ordinary meeting

    MEP questions I: Blocking statute and ICC autonomy

    First-round questions from EPP, S&D and Greens/EFA MEPs reaffirm strong political support for the ICC while pressing the Commission’s inaction on the blocking statute, EU legal obligations under cooperation agreements, and options to secure the Court’s financial and digital autonomy, including anti-coercion tools and Article 70.

    In this chapter

    1. First MEP reactions: strong political backing
    2. Greens/EFA: blocking statute, autonomy and legal tools

    Watch the moment

  18. GMT+1

    Committee on Foreign Affairs Ordinary meeting

    Attacks on ICC and appeal for EU protection

    Judge Aitala details political and legal backlash from major powers against the ICC, highlights current investigations, and urges the EU, referencing Parliament’s 2026 resolution, to operationalize tools such as the blocking statute to protect Court officials and partners.

    In this chapter

    1. Backlash from major powers and ICC’s current work
    2. European Parliament support and call for protection

    Watch the moment

  19. GMT+1

    Committee on Foreign Affairs Ordinary meeting

    Opening and ICC mandate in EU context

    The Chair opens the AFET meeting, presents the hearing format and gives Judge Aitala the floor, who recalls the ICC’s European roots, core values and the growing expectations of victims in a deteriorating international climate.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening of meeting and ICC agenda
    2. Judge Aitala: EU–ICC origins and core values
    3. Judge Aitala: erosion of values and victims’ expectations

    Watch the moment

  20. GMT+1

    Committee on Foreign Affairs Ordinary meeting Joint meeting Joint committee procedure - AFET and DEVE

    Montenegro 2025 Commission report: frontrunner status and rule of law conditions

    The committee turns to the 2025 Commission report on Montenegro; rapporteur Marian Šarec presents a broadly positive draft noting 13 provisionally closed chapters and the ambition to conclude negotiations by 2026, while insisting that Chapters 23/24, judicial independence, anti‑corruption, media freedom, environment and visa alignment remain decisive benchmarks; shadows from across groups plus several MEPs highlight Montenegro’s frontrunner position but also internal political tensions, judicial appointments, attacks on journalists, foreign interference (notably from Serbia/Russia), minority and restitution issues, and the need for credible track record before accession; Commission (DG NEAR) and EEAS confirm progress and remaining rule‑of‑law and visa‑policy gaps, stress risks from institutional tensions and hybrid threats, and underline support via EPF and security dialogue, after which Šarec thanks colleagues and McAllister sets amendment and vote deadlines.

    Watch the moment

  21. GMT+1

    Committee on Foreign Affairs Ordinary meeting Joint meeting Joint committee procedure - AFET and DEVE

    Georgia 2025 Commission report: democratic backsliding and EU response

    McAllister introduces the draft report on Georgia’s 2025 Commission report, stressing unprecedented democratic backsliding and Georgia’s status as “candidate in name only”; rapporteur Rasa Juknevičienė details regression on all nine priorities, anti‑EU disinformation by Georgian Dream, calls for targeted sanctions and warns visa‑free suspension may follow, while shadows and other MEPs underline government’s pro‑Russian drift, support for Georgian civil society and Sakharov laureates, and debate how EU sanctions and support to Ukraine link to Georgia’s trajectory; Commission (DG NEAR) and EEAS outline concrete measures already taken (downgrading contacts, suspending assistance, triggering visa‑suspension mechanism) and expectations on political prisoners, repressive laws, CFSP alignment and sanctions evasion, before the rapporteur closes and McAllister sets amendment and committee/plenary vote timelines.

    Watch the moment

  22. GMT+1

    Committee on Foreign Affairs Ordinary meeting Joint meeting Joint committee procedure - AFET and DEVE

    AFET-only voting block: EU–Canada, MFF interim opinion, Rule of Law

    After DEVE members leave, AFET votes on: the recommendation on enhanced EU–Canada cooperation (short presentation by rapporteur Tobias Kramer, vote on compromises and key amendments, then final roll‑call adoption); the draft opinion on the next MFF interim report (rapporteur Dan Barna, swift sequence of compromise amendments and final adoption); and the DROIT draft opinion on the 2025 Rule of Law Report (starting from compromise 6, multiple close roll‑call checks, series of compromises and individual amendments, ending with adoption of the opinion and confirmation that all morning votes were completed within 30 minutes.

    Watch the moment

  23. GMT+1

    Committee on Foreign Affairs Ordinary meeting Joint meeting Joint committee procedure - AFET and DEVE

    Opening of joint AFET–DEVE meeting and Global Gateway vote

    Chair David McAllister opens the joint AFET/DEVE meeting, adopts the agenda and previous minutes, then conducts a lengthy electronic vote on the Global Gateway report (past impacts and future orientation), including test vote, series of compromise and individual amendments, roll‑call checks, and final adoption of the draft report, followed by a vote approving the inter‑institutional provisional agreement on amending Regulation 2021/947 (External Action Guarantee).

    Watch the moment

Schedule

  1. Replay

    Part 1Part 2

  2. Replay

    Watch the replay

  3. Replay

    Watch the replay

  4. Replay

    Watch the replay

  5. Replay

    Watch the replay

  6. Replay

    Watch the replay

  7. Replay

    Watch the replay

  8. Replay

    Watch the replay

  9. Replay

    Watch the replay

  10. Replay

    Part 1Part 2

  11. Replay

    Part 1Part 2

  12. Replay

    Watch the replay

  13. Upcoming
    Committee on Foreign Affairs Ordinary meeting
  14. Upcoming
    Committee on Foreign Affairs - Meeting
  15. Upcoming
    Committee on Foreign Affairs - Meeting
  16. Upcoming
    Committee on Foreign Affairs - Meeting
  17. Upcoming
    Committee on Foreign Affairs - Ordinary meeting

Who spoke at the committee

  • David McAllister 33 sittings
  • Michael Gahler 16 sittings
  • Željana Zovko 16 sittings
  • Villy Søvndal 13 sittings
  • Grzegorz Braun 12 sittings
  • Nacho Sánchez Amor 11 sittings
  • Hana Jalloul Muro 10 sittings
  • Davor Ivo Stier 9 sittings
  • Helmut Brandstätter 9 sittings
  • Stanislav Stoyanov 8 sittings
  • Thomas Waitz 7 sittings
  • Andreas Schieder 6 sittings
  • António Tânger Corrêa 6 sittings
  • Dan Barna 6 sittings
  • Petras Auštrevičius 6 sittings
  • Rihards Kols 6 sittings
  • Evin Incir 5 sittings
  • Marjan Šarec 5 sittings
  • Marta Temido 5 sittings
  • Matjaž Nemec 5 sittings
  • Thijs Reuten 5 sittings
  • Arkadiusz Mularczyk 4 sittings
  • Chloé Ridel 4 sittings
  • Hilde Vautmans 4 sittings
  • Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann 4 sittings
  • Mounir Satouri 4 sittings
  • Nela Riehl 4 sittings
  • Şerban Dimitrie Sturdza 4 sittings
  • Tineke Strik 4 sittings
  • Tobias Cremer 4 sittings

Where these transcripts come from

European Parliament broadcasts the sittings of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (AFET). Polyfact shows each one live, keeps it as a replay with its transcript and links its key moments to the second they were said.

76 sittings on Polyfact since 9 April 2025

Polyfact records and transcribes the sittings and committee hearings of European Union's parliaments. A speaker is named only once their identity is confirmed, by the official record or by a person; automatic guesses are left out.

Every committee

Questions

How can I watch the Committee on Foreign Affairs (AFET) live?

On Polyfact, free and without an account: a sitting on air is marked live in the schedule above, and each sitting stays available as a replay.

Is it free?

Yes. Watching the sittings on Polyfact is free and needs no account. A Polyfact subscription, which you can try for free, adds the full transcripts as soon as they are ready, search across every sitting and alerts on your topics.

Where is the transcript of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (AFET)?

On each sitting's page on Polyfact, speaker by speaker, with its key moments one click from the second they were said. The search on this page covers the sittings held more than two weeks ago.

Follow every committee without searching

With a Polyfact plan you read every sitting as soon as it is transcribed, ask questions to the video assistant and get an alert as soon as your topics come up.

14-day free trial. A card is required, nothing is charged for 14 days, and you can cancel anytime.

Updated