European Union

How to watch European Union parliamentary committees

Every sitting is free to watch on Polyfact, live and on replay, no account needed.

Latest updates

What is said in the sittings, update by update, the latest first. Each update opens the video at the second it was said.

  1. GMT+1

    Committee on Legal Affairs (JURI)

    Better lawmaking package: Mandate and political lines

    The committee opens with the 2025–2026 report on better regulation and regulatory fitness, as rapporteur Warborn and political groups set out priorities on impact assessments, gold‑plating, scrutiny of urgent procedures, SME tests, and the balance between competitiveness, social and environmental objectives.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening and mandate: Better lawmaking reportIlhan Kyuchyuk
    2. Warborn: Gold-plating, scrutiny board and burden metricsJörgen Warborn

    Watch the moment

  2. GMT+1

    Committee on Legal Affairs (JURI)

    Better regulation 2025–2026: rapporteur and shadows’ priorities

    Presentation of the draft report on better law‑making and reactions from political groups, addressing impact assessments for major proposals and amendments, limits on national gold‑plating, strengthening the Regulatory Scrutiny Board, tracking net regulatory burden and competitiveness, while balancing SME‑friendly simplification with social, sustainability and equality objectives and tighter rules on urgent procedures and delegated/implementing acts.

    Watch the moment

  3. GMT+1

    Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE)

    EU–US agreement: reciprocity, scope and data‑protection concerns

    MEPs Dupont, Sippel and others question reciprocity in member‑state bilaterals, EU capacity to meet US deadlines, cumulative data transfers to the US and effective control, while the Commission stresses selective, risk‑based queries, member‑state discretion to refuse transfers, and oversight across existing PNR, TFTP and Europol tools.

    In this chapter

    1. EPP: Dupont: reciprocity, deadlines and safeguardsLena Düpont
    2. S&D: Sippel: cumulative data transfers and controlBirgit Sippel

    Watch the moment

  4. GMT+1

    Committee on Petitions (PETI)

    Roma discrimination in Hungary and nuclear energy policy

    The committee considers a petition on Roma discrimination and hate rhetoric in Hungary, with DG JUST recalling existing infringements and the Racial Equality Directive, before turning to a petition on equal treatment of nuclear energy in EU policy, where DG ENER and several MEPs debate technology‑neutrality, state‑aid control and investment conditions, and PETI keeps both petitions open while requesting further input from the Commission and ITRE.

    Watch the moment

  5. GMT+1

    Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (AGRI)

    Commission replies: CAP simplification, gold‑plating, promotion figures and CAP architecture

    Commissioner Hansen responds by stressing shared responsibility with Parliament for complex legislation, detailing current and planned simplification tools (Food & Feed Omnibus, guidance and anti‑gold‑plating instruments), clarifying promotion budget arithmetic and under‑used lines, and outlining the approach to Birds, Habitats and Nitrates, eligibility of plant proteins, risks of making core CAP mechanisms voluntary, and the need for predictable CAP and MFF decisions for farmers’ investments.

    In this chapter

    1. Commission replies I: scope of debate, CAP simplification and Birds/HabitatsChristophe Hansen
    2. Commission replies II: gold‑plating tools and promotion figures clarifiedChristophe Hansen

    Watch the moment

  6. GMT+1

    Committee on Culture and Education (CULT)

    Panel 1: Digital safeguards, prominence and platform power

    The first panel examines EMFA’s digital aspects (Articles 18, 20, 24), AVMSD prominence rules and regulatory gaps, with experts, broadcasters and regulators outlining risks from platforms, algorithms and AI, followed by a broad political debate on disinformation, media independence, visibility, literacy and the use of EMFA/DSA tools, concluding with wrap-up messages on direct rights, prominence and funding instruments like AgoraEU.

    In this chapter

    1. Panel 1 introduction: digital aspects and prominenceNela Riehl
    2. Expert Ledger: current EU framework and regulatory gapsNela Riehl
    3. Broadcasters (MFE): prominence on connected devices and AINela Riehl

    Watch the moment

  7. GMT+1

    Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE)

    EU–US security screenings: mandate and safeguards

    The Chair and Commission present the EU–US Enhanced Border Security Partnership framework, explaining the EU legal competence, two‑level (EU and bilateral) structure, refusal of US direct system access, limits on mass queries, the automated hit/no‑hit plus human‑follow‑up model, and embedded data‑protection safeguards assessed by the EDPS.

    In this chapter

    1. Chair: introduction to EU‑US security screenings agreementJavier Zarzalejos
    2. Commission: mandate, competence and two‑level structure
    3. Commission: refusal of direct system access and strict purpose

    Watch the moment

  8. GMT+1

    Committee on International Trade (INTA)

    EU trade treatment of Israeli settlement products

    Members debate possible EU‑level trade measures on products from Israeli settlements, as EEAS, DG TRADE and DG TAXUD outline the deteriorating West Bank context, current differentiation and customs controls, legal constraints and Council divisions, while MEPs split between advocating a full EU‑wide ban and defending existing trade ties and Palestinian employment, increasing political pressure on the Commission to table a proposal.

    In this chapter

    1. Item 17 introduction: EU trade treatment of Israeli settlement productsBernd Lange
    2. First round of MEP positions: calls for EU‑wide ban vs defence of trade tiesBernd Lange

    Watch the moment

  9. GMT+1

    Committee on Human Rights (DROI)

    Indonesia/ASEAN mission: human rights leverage and internal dissent

    The Chair and MEPs review the DROI mission to Indonesia and ASEAN, debate how strongly to press human rights (including West Papua and LGBTQI+ issues) in trade and political relations, and confront differing views on EU tone, conditionality and engagement with government counterparts.

    In this chapter

    1. Chair opens meeting: Indonesia/ASEAN mission recapMounir Satouri
    2. Temido: Human rights conditionality for EU–Indonesia tradeMarta Temido
    3. Biedroń: ASEAN parliamentary diplomacy and human rights defendersRobert Biedroń
    4. Jongen and Chair: Tone on LGBTQI+ and government meetingsMounir Satouri

    Watch the moment

  10. GMT+1

    Committee on Human Rights (DROI)

    DROI mission to Indonesia–ASEAN: findings and debate

    Report‑back on the Indonesia–ASEAN mission highlighting civic space, minority rights and ICC advocacy, with MEPs pressing for stronger parliamentary cooperation and HRD protection and debating the delegation’s tone and tactics, including on LGBTQI+ rights and meetings with government officials.

    In this chapter

    1. Indonesia–ASEAN mission: objectives, concerns and ICC advocacyMounir Satouri
    2. Temido: Indonesia’s contingent view of rights and West PapuaMarta Temido
    3. Parliamentary follow‑up: ASEAN cooperation and HRDs in Indonesia
    4. Jongen’s critique and Chair’s defence of mission approach

    Watch the moment

  11. GMT+1

    Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (AGRI)

    Political groups II: Greens/Left, rapporteur and shadows on CAP model and funding gap

    Greens and Left MEPs warn against ‘voluntarisation’ of key CAP tools, export‑oriented promotion and deregulation risks for climate, plant‑protein strategies and animal welfare, while Rapporteur De Meo and shadows across groups insist on genuine simplification, easier access for small farms, maintaining or restoring the €205 million promotion level, and clarifying the balance between trade policy, origin labelling and support for vulnerable sectors.

    In this chapter

    1. Greens & Left: CAP voluntarisation, product mix and MercosurThomas Waitz
    2. Rapporteur De Meo: evaluation of promotion policy and budget gapSalvatore De Meo
    3. Shadows (S&D, Patriots, ECR/Renew): access to funds and social prioritiesCamilla Laureti
    4. Greens/Left: criticism of export focus, deregulation risks and animal welfareMartin Häusling

    Watch the moment

  12. GMT+1

    Committee on Culture and Education (CULT)

    Opening: Commission framing of EMFA digital tools

    The chair opens the second EMFA implementation day and the Commission sets out the rationale and key digital provisions of EMFA, explaining Articles 18, 20 and 24 and their interaction with AVMSD and future prominence reforms to protect trustworthy media online.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening of second EMFA implementation dayNela Riehl
    2. Commission: digital disruption and EMFA rationale
    3. Commission: Article 18 on platform moderation

    Watch the moment

  13. GMT+1

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (FEMM)

    Study on defunding women’s rights CSOs: findings, backlash and EU funding

    The Chair introduces the study on defunding women’s rights organisations and gender backsliding, the authors document funding cuts, administrative harassment and diversion of resources away from specialist services, analyse anti‑gender networks and the concept of backsliding without formal legal repeal, and MEPs clash over the framing of ‘backsliding’ while raising concerns about migrant women, threatened national services and low Daphne success rates; the authors then recommend multi‑annual operating grants, more accessible and traceable EU funding (including Daphne and GAP IV targets), and safeguards to ensure EU money supports specialist feminist services rather than anti‑equality actors, before the Chair closes the public meeting.

    In this chapter

    1. Intro to study on defunding women’s rights CSOsLina Gálvez
    2. Defunding study: role of WROs and mounting financial pressuresHedvika Janečková
    3. Defunding study: loss of specialist services, anti‑gender actors and backslidingRebecca Tildesley

    Watch the moment

  14. GMT+1

    Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (AGRI)

    Political groups I: coordinators on simplification, gold‑plating and promotion budget

    Group coordinators from EPP, S&D, Patriots, ECR and Renew question the pace and depth of CAP simplification, urge stronger EU action against national gold‑plating, criticise perceived cuts and reallocations in promotion funding (simple vs multi programmes, quality schemes), and debate how Birds, Habitats and Nitrates rules should be revised without undermining farmers or environmental ambition.

    In this chapter

    1. Coordinators (EPP, S&D, Patriots): simplification pace and promotion fundingVeronika Vrecionová
    2. Coordinators (ECR, Renew): gold‑plating pact and Birds/Habitats reviewElsi Katainen

    Watch the moment

  15. GMT+1

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (FEMM)

    Debate on gender mainstreaming implementation, quotas and delegations

    MEPs debate how to operationalise gender mainstreaming and gender budgeting, including better uptake of FEMM amendments, mandatory justifications when they are rejected, divergent views on gender quotas in party lists, the role of delegations and external relations, and the need for resources, monitoring and civil society engagement to turn formal equality into concrete institutional change, before co‑rapporteurs and the Chair signal next steps and the January vote.

    In this chapter

    1. Debate: mainstreaming tools, EIGE support and FEMM’s uptakeElisabeth Grossmann
    2. Delegations, leadership quotas and civil society resourcesGiusi Princi

    Watch the moment

  16. GMT+1

    Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (AGRI)

    Opening and Commission presentation on CAP simplification and promotion

    The Chair opens the AGRI meeting, sets the agenda on CAP simplification and agri‑food promotion, and Commissioner Hansen presents the Commission’s approach to simplifying CAP implementation and related acquis, warning against national gold‑plating and detailing the proposed 2027 promotion budget and work‑programme priorities, including support for SMEs and trade diplomacy campaigns.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening of AGRI meeting: agenda setVeronika Vrecionová
    2. Commission: CAP simplification and legislative follow‑upChristophe Hansen
    3. Commission: gold‑plating, enforcement and 2027 promotion budgetChristophe Hansen
    4. Commission: promotion priorities, SMEs, and trade diplomacyChristophe Hansen

    Watch the moment

  17. GMT+1

    Committee on Legal Affairs (JURI)

    Emerging technologies: ethical‑legal challenges in human reproduction

    JURI seminar on emerging technologies examines their interaction with EU values, then focuses on synthetic human genomics and artificial placenta/womb research, detailing scientific state of play, risks of reproductive and eugenic uses, identity and dignity concerns, gaps in parental and fetal/child status protections, and MEP–expert exchanges on liability, intergenerational effects and democratic control of such reproductive technologies.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening of ethics seminar: emerging technologies, values and regulationMario Mantovani
    2. Synthetic human genomics: scientific state and EU ethical-legal frameworkMario Mantovani
    3. Artificial placenta and artificial womb: legal and ethical landscapeMario Mantovani
    4. MEP concerns on synthetic genome and artificial womb: expert repliesMario Mantovani

    Watch the moment

  18. GMT+1

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (FEMM)

    Gender mainstreaming report: mandate, tools and budget focus

    The Chair closes the AI item and introduces the annual report on gender mainstreaming in the European Parliament, as co‑rapporteurs and the BUDG opinion rapporteur present priorities on women’s access to Parliament and leadership, gender‑responsive budgeting across EU institutions and the entire budget cycle, systematic use of EIGE tools and sex‑disaggregated data, and the need for standardised gender impact assessments, stronger FEMM influence, and clear timetables under Parliament’s Gender Action Plan.

    In this chapter

    1. Transition: from AI study to gender mainstreaming fileLina Gálvez
    2. Gender mainstreaming report: scope, data and safe workplacesValérie Devaux
    3. Co‑rapporteur Kuhnke: implementation gaps and FEMM’s weak influenceAlice Kuhnke
    4. BUDG opinion: gender budgeting across the EU budgetLucia Yar

    Watch the moment

  19. GMT+1

    Committee on Human Rights (DROI)

    MEP scrutiny: abusive CT laws and EU leverage

    MEPs question experts on vague terrorism definitions, restrictions on free expression, CT misuse against activists in Europe and Turkey, and the EU’s concrete conditionality and accountability tools, followed by expert replies on legal tests, remedies, sanctions, and coherence, and the formal closing of the workshop.

    In this chapter

    1. MEP questions: definitions, free speech, abuse and accountabilityHana Jalloul Muro
    2. Sánchez Amor: Turkey’s anti‑terror law and EU leverage
    3. Chair Satouri: concern over exceptional laws and EU toolsMounir Satouri

    Watch the moment

  20. GMT+1

    Committee on International Trade (INTA)

    EU forced labour regulation: international context and implementation

    The committee turns to the new EU forced labour regulation, with the Commission mapping global import bans, detailing US and other partners’ enforcement models, and then addressing MEPs’ concerns about Xinjiang, the delayed EU risk database, GSP treatment of high‑risk products, potential protectionism, and the practical application of the EU regime and cooperation with the US and ILO.

    In this chapter

    1. Item 16 launch: EU forced labour regulation and global contextBernd Lange
    2. Commission: global mapping of forced labour import bans and US enforcement
    3. MEPs’ concerns: Xinjiang, database delay, GSP rice, EU leadership and member statesBernd Lange
    4. Commission replies on FLR implementation, China decrees and cooperation with USUdo Bullmann

    Watch the moment

  21. GMT+1

    Committee on Petitions (PETI)

    Environmental impact, EIA compliance and waste management cases

    PETI reviews petitions on a Polish urban plan in Górki Czechowskie, a Croatian marina project near Posidonia meadows and illegally buried hazardous waste in Gospić, with DG ENV outlining the applicable EIA, Habitats, waste and Aarhus rules, pending national and EU procedures, and MEPs supporting keeping all three environmental petitions open, seeking deeper Commission scrutiny, written replies and follow‑up with Croatian authorities.

    In this chapter

    1. Petition 0193/2026: Górki Czechowskie urban plan and EU environmental lawBogdan Rzońca
    2. Petition 0810/2026: Cavtat marina resort and Natura 2000 Posidonia meadowsBogdan Rzońca
    3. Petition 1555/2026: illegal hazardous waste in Gospić, CroatiaBogdan Rzońca

    Watch the moment

  22. GMT+1

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (FEMM)

    Authors’ responses on AI regulation, enforcement and bias

    The study authors respond to MEPs on how AI can be steered for positive equality outcomes via feminist, rights‑based regulation, explain enforcement and accountability challenges under the AI Act and DSA (including limits of self‑assessment, de‑risking, resourcing of equality bodies and trusted flaggers, and the AI Office’s guidance role), and clarify how unconscious developer bias, data gaps, moderation practices and weak complaint handling reproduce structural gender inequalities beyond classic discrimination concepts.

    In this chapter

    1. Authors’ replies: AI for good, enforcement, civil society and de‑riskingLina Gálvez
    2. Co‑author replies: unconscious bias, values, data gaps and trainingCarlotta Rigotti

    Watch the moment

  23. GMT+1

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (FEMM)

    MEP positions on AI, gender bias and online violence

    Rapporteur and shadow speakers from multiple groups outline political priorities and concerns on AI’s risks and opportunities for gender equality, focusing on online abuse, deepfakes and hypersexualisation, the limits of current bans and classifications, structural discrimination in labour and welfare, data and NGO roles, and the need for stronger enforcement, reporting systems and a possible EU‑wide AI liability regime, including reference to stricter national approaches such as Italy’s labour rules.

    In this chapter

    1. Rapporteur statement (Greek): AI risks, opportunities and legal conceptsEleonora Meleti
    2. S&D: AI, online violence and structural discriminationAlessandra Moretti
    3. Patriots (ECR‑aligned): deepfakes, hypersexualisation and valuesMargarita de la Pisa Carrión

    Watch the moment

  24. GMT+1

    Committee on Human Rights (DROI)

    DROI workshop: misuse of counter‑terrorism laws

    Opening of the DROI workshop, presentation of the commissioned study, and initial expert statements from the UN Special Rapporteur, FIDH and EEAS on global misuse of counter‑terrorism frameworks and the EU’s human‑rights‑based approach.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening of DROI workshop and panel introductionsMounir Satouri
    2. Study author: global misuse patterns and EU toolboxMounir Satouri
    3. UN Special Rapporteur: global counter‑terrorism abuses

    Watch the moment

  25. GMT+1

    Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (FEMM)

    FEMM opening and AI gender‑bias study mandate

    The Chair opens the FEMM meeting during Gender Equality Week, sets the agenda and links the commissioned study on gender bias and AI to the committee’s own‑initiative work, while the authors present their research questions, impacts across key life domains and tech‑facilitated GBV, and a detailed analysis of the EU legal framework (equality law, GDPR, DSA, AI Act, VAW directive), including remedies, gaps and recommendations.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening: agenda for FEMM meeting and AI studyLina Gálvez
    2. Study Q1: defining gender bias in AICarlotta Rigotti
    3. Study Q2–Q3: impacts across life domains and tech‑facilitated GBVCarlotta Rigotti
    4. Study Q4–Q6: EU legal framework, AI Act, remedies and gapsLina Gálvez

    Watch the moment

  26. GMT+1

    Committee on Legal Affairs (JURI)

    Anti‑SLAPP Directive: implementation, Commission update and Q&A

    Joint JURI–LIBE hearing on the 2024/1069 anti‑SLAPP Directive, covering the legal framework, uneven and often minimalist national transposition, gaps on domestic SLAPPs, examples from Malta, Belgium and candidate countries, Commission monitoring and infringement action, and an in‑depth Q&A on incentives for broader scope, judicial training, early dismissal tools and possible future legislative revisions within current Treaty limits.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening: agenda and anti-SLAPP directive contextMario Mantovani
    2. Expert Borg-Barthet: uneven transposition of anti-SLAPP directiveMario Mantovani
    3. Civil society expert Kusari: domestic SLAPPs, training and victim supportFlutura Kusari

    Watch the moment

  27. GMT+1

    Committee on Petitions (PETI)

    Opening of PETI meeting and health‑related petitions

    The Chair opens the PETI meeting, confirms coordinators’ decisions and agenda, then examines petitions on low‑glycaemic sweeteners for diabetic consumers and fluoroquinolone‑associated disability, with DG SANTE detailing the EU legal and scientific framework while MEPs argue to keep both health files open and request updated Commission information.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening of PETI meeting: coordinators’ decisions and agendaBogdan Rzońca
    2. Petition 2661/2025: high-GI sweeteners and diabetic consumersBogdan Rzońca
    3. Petition 1043/2026: fluoroquinolone‑associated disability (FQAD)Bogdan Rzońca

    Watch the moment

  28. GMT+1

    Committee on International Trade (INTA)

    ILO annual exchange on labour standards in EU trade

    The Chair opens the INTA session and conducts the annual exchange with the ILO on labour standards implementation in EU trade instruments, focusing on Colombia, the Philippines, Argentina and Uzbekistan, with MEPs and the Commission scrutinising ILO findings, government reforms and the leverage of FTAs and GSP+ before closing the item.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening of meeting and introduction of ILO annual exchangeBernd Lange
    2. ILO: assessment of labour standards in Colombia, Philippines, Argentina, Uzbekistan
    3. MEPs’ questions to ILO: focus on Philippines, Argentina, Colombia, Uzbekistan, PanamaBernd Lange

    Watch the moment

Schedule

  1. Replay
    Plenary sittings

    Plenary Session

    Watch the replay

  2. Replay
    European Commission

    College read-out / Press conference (with international sign language) by European Commission Executive Vice-President Henna VIRKKUNEN and Commissioner Michael McGRATH on the Digital Fairness Act and a Consumer enforcement initiative

    Watch the replay

  3. Replay
    European Commission

    College read-out / Press conference by European Commission Executive Vice-President Henna VIRKKUNEN and Commissioner Michael McGRATH on the Digital Fairness Act and a Consumer enforcement initiative

    Part 1Part 2Part 3Part 4

  4. Replay
    European Commission

    European Commission President Ursula von der LEYEN in Antalya, Türkiye for the COP31

    Part 1Part 2Part 3

  5. Replay
    European Commission

    European Commissioner Dan JØRGENSEN in Antalya, Türkiye for the COP31

    Part 1Part 2Part 3Part 4

  6. Replay
    European Commission

    European flags at half-mast following the dramatic accident on the Trakia motorway in the area of Yambol, in Bulgaria

    Watch the replay

  7. Replay
    European Commission

    European Commissioner Andrius KUBILIUS at the UARM Hub Launch: From Frontline Innovation to European Defence Readiness

    Watch the replay

  8. Replay
    Committee on Constitutional Affairs (AFCO)

    Committee on Constitutional Affairs Ordinary meeting

    Watch the replay

  9. Replay
    Committee on Security and Defence (SEDE)

    Committee on Security and Defence Ordinary meeting

    Watch the replay

  10. Replay
    Committee on Development (DEVE)

    Committee on Development Ordinary meeting HEARING

    Watch the replay

  11. Replay
    Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON)

    Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs Ordinary meeting

    Watch the replay

  12. Replay
    Committee on Public Health (SANT)

    SANT – ICM on Lessons Learnt from the COVID-19 Pandemic: Strengthening EU Health Resilience and Preparedness for Future Global Health Crises

    Watch the replay

  13. Upcoming
    Committee on Budgetary Control (CONT)

    Committee on Budgetary Control Ordinary meeting CONT Committee meeting

  14. Upcoming
    Committee on European Democracy Shield (special committee) (EUDS)

    Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Ordinary meeting

  15. Upcoming
    Committee on Housing Crisis (special committee) (HOUS)

    Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union Ordinary meeting

  16. Upcoming
    Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE)

    7th Inter-Parliamentary Committee Meeting On Evaluation Of The European Union Agency For Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) Activities

  17. Upcoming
    Committee on European Democracy Shield (special committee) (EUDS)

    Issues raised by bot farming and social media anonymity in elections

Every committee

European Parliament, European Council and European Commission broadcast their sittings. Polyfact shows each one live, keeps it as a replay with its transcript and links its key moments to the second they were said.

European Parliament

European Council

European Commission

Questions

How can I watch European Union parliamentary committees live?

On Polyfact, free and without an account: a sitting on air is marked live in the schedule above, and each committee below has its own page with its latest sittings.

Is it free?

Yes. Watching the sittings on Polyfact is free and needs no account. A Polyfact subscription, which you can try for free, adds the full transcripts as soon as they are ready, search across every sitting and alerts on your topics.

Where are the transcripts?

On each sitting's page on Polyfact, speaker by speaker, with its key moments one click from the second they were said.

Follow every committee without searching

With a Polyfact plan you read every sitting as soon as it is transcribed, ask questions to the video assistant and get an alert as soon as your topics come up.

14-day free trial. A card is required, nothing is charged for 14 days, and you can cancel anytime.

Updated