U.S. House of Representatives

How to watch the House Education and Workforce Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor, and Pensions

Every sitting is free to watch on Polyfact, live and on replay, no account needed.

Latest updates

Latest update 57 days ago

What is said in the sittings, update by update, the latest first. Each update opens the video at the second it was said.

  1. EDT

    "Out of Touch: When Union Politics Leave Workers Behind"

    Closing statements: unions’ role in worker protection and politics

    Rep. McBath and Ranking Member DeSaulnier emphasize unions’ role in exposing wage underpayment in DOD contracting and as democratic counterweights to concentrated wealth, while Chair Allen closes by reiterating concerns about partisan use of compulsory dues and misalignment with members’ political preferences before adjourning the hearing.

    In this chapter

    1. Rep. McBath statement: GAO findings on DOD contracting and union advocacy
    2. Ranking Member closing and Chair Allen adjournment: competing narratives on unions

    Watch the moment

  2. EDT

    "Out of Touch: When Union Politics Leave Workers Behind"

    Late Q&A: internal union democracy, member alignment, and broader policy agenda

    Members probe union leadership stances on Israel and military aid, internal democratic checks, member–leader political divergence, recertification and endorsement transparency proposals, and unions’ advocacy on wider issues like community concerns and heat protections, while revisiting legal limits on dues for politics and partisan records on labor, health, and misclassification policy.

    In this chapter

    1. Rep. Fine Q&A: unions’ Israel positions and partisan alignmentRandy Fine
    2. Rep. Meany Q&A: internal union democracy and limits on dues for politics
    3. Rep. Onder Q&A: member–leader divergence, recertification, and worker choice

    Watch the moment

  3. EDT

    "Out of Touch: When Union Politics Leave Workers Behind"

    Mid-hearing Q&A: unions, democracy, and foreign policy positions

    Questioning turns to unions’ role in counterbalancing corporate power, barriers to organizing, and unions’ foreign policy resolutions such as calls for a Gaza ceasefire, with witnesses contrasting unions as democratic institutions that reduce inequality and stabilize democracies versus arguments that a 1930s-style, compulsory model no longer fits today’s labor markets.

    In this chapter

    1. Rep. Summer Lee Q&A: corporate power, democracy, and barriers to organizingSummer Lee
    2. Rep. Burgess Owens Q&A: foreign policy resolutions and 1935 labor modelBurgess Owens
    3. Rep. Takano Q&A: wage stagnation, PRO Act, and democracyMark Takano

    Watch the moment

  4. EDT

    "Out of Touch: When Union Politics Leave Workers Behind"

    Initial Q&A: union political activity and worker protections

    Members question witnesses on whether unions have become primarily political entities versus vehicles for workplace gains, debating right-to-work protections, union approval trends, the wage–productivity link, and LM‑2-documented luxury and resort spending, with Republicans highlighting political opt-in proposals and Democrats stressing unions’ role in raising wages and productivity.

    In this chapter

    1. Chair Walberg Q&A: union politics versus member choiceTim Walberg
    2. Rep. Courtney Q&A: pro-union public sentiment and wage–productivity link
    3. Chair Allen Q&A: union luxury spending and transparency reforms

    Watch the moment

  5. EDT

    "Out of Touch: When Union Politics Leave Workers Behind"

    Opening of hearing and witness opening statements

    Chair Allen opens the hearing, outlines its focus on whether union leaders’ political spending and use of dues reflect members’ interests, then four witnesses present sharply contrasting views on partisan union spending, opt-in rules for political use of dues, unions’ benefits for wages/health/democracy, and arguments for a National Right to Work Act.

    In this chapter

    1. Chair Allen opens hearing: unions and political agendas
    2. Witness Jones (AAF): partisan union spending and lifestyle perks
    3. Witness Chougule: Employee Rights Act and political opt‑in

    Watch the moment

  6. EDT

    “Direct Contracting: A Prescription for Lower Health Care Costs”

    Final clarifications on CBO, HR 1 risks, and closing positions

    The ranking member reestablishes CBO’s projected coverage losses under HR 1, links them to hospital closure risks even in affluent districts, and calls for balanced public‑private reform, while the chair closes by emphasizing frustration with opaque spending, defending free‑market tools like direct contracting, and formally adjourns the hearing amid unresolved partisan disagreement.

    In this chapter

    1. Ranking Member DeSaulnier: clarifying CBO, mixed markets, and HR 1 hospital risk
    2. Closing statements: unresolved divide on HR 1 and direct contracting

    Watch the moment

  7. EDT

    “Direct Contracting: A Prescription for Lower Health Care Costs”

    Market‑driven reforms: DPC, small‑business relief, and data transparency

    Members explore how direct primary care could reduce ER and hospital use and support small-business affordability, then pivot to legislative proposals like the Health Data Act to mandate data sharing, expand employer access to claims and cost information, and promote real-time direct payment models to cut administrative waste and fraud.

    In this chapter

    1. Rep. Owens: DPC’s impact on utilization and small‑business relief
    2. Rep. Onder: waste, Health Data Act, and real‑time payment

    Watch the moment

  8. EDT

    “Direct Contracting: A Prescription for Lower Health Care Costs”

    Decorum conflict, recess, and renewed focus on payment ‘spread’

    A sharp confrontation over CBO coverage estimates and accusations of witness dishonesty triggers a decorum dispute, motion to take down remarks, and a recess; after reconvening, questioning shifts to detailed analysis of the gap between employer spending and provider receipts and arguments for simplifying payment flows and restoring price-based market incentives.

    In this chapter

    1. Rep. Fine confrontation, decorum dispute, and recess
    2. Post‑recess: payment ‘spread’ analysis and free‑market framing

    Watch the moment

  9. EDT

    “Direct Contracting: A Prescription for Lower Health Care Costs”

    Early Q&A: scalability, HR 1 coverage losses, and small‑employer implications

    Members question witnesses on value-based metrics, small and mid-sized employer participation, projected coverage losses and uncompensated care under HR 1, rural hospital viability, and whether direct contracting can be comprehensive and transparent within the broader insurance and state-budget context.

    In this chapter

    1. Chair’s Q&A: quality metrics and small employer barriers
    2. Rep. from California: coverage losses, uncompensated care, and rural access
    3. Rep. Walberg: Michigan savings, HSAs, and market competitionTim Walberg
    4. Rep. Scott: scalability, transparency, and HR 1 fallout

    Watch the moment

  10. EDT

    “Direct Contracting: A Prescription for Lower Health Care Costs”

    Witness testimonies: direct contracting models and HR 1 impacts

    Witnesses present contrasting perspectives on direct primary care and employer direct contracting, describing cost, utilization, and access benefits, while Protect Our Care highlights projected coverage losses, hospital closures, and distributional impacts linked to HR 1’s Medicaid and ACA cuts.

    In this chapter

    1. Witness Savage: direct primary care model and policy asks
    2. Witness Newman: Nomi Health and payment reform via direct contracting
    3. Witness Woodhouse: HR 1 cuts, coverage losses, and hospital crisis
    4. Witness Gelfand: large employers’ direct contracting models

    Watch the moment

  11. EDT

    “Direct Contracting: A Prescription for Lower Health Care Costs”

    Hearing opening, agenda, and procedural framework

    The chair and ranking member open the hearing, set its scope around employer-sponsored coverage pressures and direct contracting, contrast partisan views on HR 1, ACA, and drug pricing, and establish procedural rules, timelines, and introduce the witness panel.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening of hearing: scope and objectives
    2. Ranking Member opening: HR 1, ACA, and drug pricing
    3. Procedural record and witness introductions

    Watch the moment

  12. EDT

    “Examining the Policies and Priorities of the NLRB”

    Amazon conflict‑of‑interest concerns and closing assessments

    Rep. Omar challenges Carey over her past Morgan Lewis work and a key Amazon settlement, focusing on recusals and joint‑employer implications, before the Chair and Ranking Member deliver contrasting partisan evaluations of the Biden‑Harris NLRB, emphasize backlog reduction and neutrality, and outline next oversight steps before adjournment.

    In this chapter

    1. Rep. Omar: Amazon settlement, Morgan Lewis ties, and recusals
    2. Closing statements: partisan assessments and next steps

    Watch the moment

  13. EDT

    “Examining the Policies and Priorities of the NLRB”

    Q&A: NLRB mission, worker status, resources, and ethics

    The panel examines the Board’s statutory mission and limited remedies, debates independent‑contractor and student‑athlete status along with decertification dynamics, reviews staffing gaps and captive‑audience restrictions, and delves into ethics safeguards, conflicts of interest, and potential interagency responses to repeat labor‑law violators.

    In this chapter

    1. Rep. Scott: mission, remedies limits, and backlog composition
    2. Subcommittee Vice‑Chair: independent contractors, student athletes, and decertification
    3. Rep. Hayes: staffing gaps, funding cuts, and captive‑audience limits
    4. Ranking Member DeSaulnier: ethics, oversight, and political pressure

    Watch the moment

  14. EDT

    “Examining the Policies and Priorities of the NLRB”

    Mid Q&A: union elections, GC neutrality, and Stericycle

    Members scrutinize low‑turnout union elections and the Cemex framework, probe Carey’s perceived bias and political influence, and challenge Biden‑era decisions like Stericycle and Lion Elastomers for their interaction with Title VII, as Carey defends her ethics compliance and regional enforcement approach.

    In this chapter

    1. Rep. Stefanik (R): low‑turnout union elections and Cemex orders
    2. Rep. McBath: bias concerns, political influence, and NLRA policy
    3. Rep. Fine: Stericycle, Title VII, and regional discretion

    Watch the moment

  15. EDT

    “Examining the Policies and Priorities of the NLRB”

    Early Q&A: NLRB independence, backlog drivers, and funding needs

    Members question Murphy and Carey on first‑contract delays, NLRB independence from the White House, GC enforcement discretion, settlement standards, and the extent to which quorum loss, precedent‑changing agendas, and understaffing have produced the backlog, while pressing for additional funding and staff authority.

    In this chapter

    1. Chair’s Q&A: first contracts, good‑faith bargaining, and quorum
    2. Rep. Lee: NLRB independence and Carey’s past corporate work
    3. Chair Walberg: government role, GC discretion, and employer speechTim Walberg

    Watch the moment

  16. EDT

    “Examining the Policies and Priorities of the NLRB”

    Hearing opening: mandate, backlog, and funding

    The Subcommittee opens the oversight hearing, sets procedural rules, contrasts Biden‑Harris and Trump NLRB policies, and hears opening statements from Chair Murphy and GC Carey on the historic case backlog, resource constraints, and commitment to reducing delays while preserving Board traditions.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening of hearing: mandate and GOP critique
    2. Ranking Member opening: pro-union stance and funding
    3. Procedural announcements and witness introductions

    Watch the moment

Where these transcripts come from

U.S. House of Representatives broadcasts the sittings of the House Education and Workforce Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor, and Pensions. Polyfact shows each one live, keeps it as a replay with its transcript and links its key moments to the second they were said.

10 sittings on Polyfact since 2 April 2025

Polyfact records and transcribes the sittings and committee hearings of United States's parliaments. A speaker is named only once their identity is confirmed, by the official record or by a person; automatic guesses are left out.

Every committee

Questions

How can I watch the House Education and Workforce Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor, and Pensions live?

On Polyfact, free and without an account: a sitting on air is marked live in the schedule above, and each sitting stays available as a replay.

Is it free?

Yes. Watching the sittings on Polyfact is free and needs no account. A Polyfact subscription, which you can try for free, adds the full transcripts as soon as they are ready, search across every sitting and alerts on your topics.

Where is the transcript of the House Education and Workforce Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor, and Pensions?

On each sitting's page on Polyfact, speaker by speaker, with its key moments one click from the second they were said. The search on this page covers the sittings held more than two weeks ago.

Follow every committee without searching

With a Polyfact plan you read every sitting as soon as it is transcribed, ask questions to the video assistant and get an alert as soon as your topics come up.

14-day free trial. A card is required, nothing is charged for 14 days, and you can cancel anytime.

Updated