European Parliament

How to watch the Committee on Fisheries (PECH)

Every sitting is free to watch on Polyfact, live and on replay, no account needed.

Latest updates

What is said in the sittings, update by update, the latest first. Each update opens the video at the second it was said.

  1. GMT+2

    Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreements: future strategy, local impacts and geopolitical competition

    DG MARE presents its 2040 vision for a new generation of SFPAs, after which MEPs debate their “win‑win” potential, under‑utilisation, impacts on local communities, development priorities, food security, level playing field issues versus other fleets (notably China) and the balance between economic interests and sustainability‑ and values‑based conditions. The Commission concludes by reaffirming SFPAs as a core external fisheries tool and announcing work on dormant agreements, value‑for‑money, IUU control and strengthened social conditions in the forthcoming strategy.

    In this chapter

    1. Commission (DG MARE): vision for new generation SFPAsCarmen Crespo Díaz
    2. Pro‑SFPA voices: win‑win potential and competition from other fleetsFrancisco José Millán Mon
    3. Social and local development dimension: Guinea‑Bissau and Côte d’Ivoire lessonsEric Sargiacomo

    Watch the moment

  2. GMT+2

    European eel regulation: status, management plans and enforcement gaps

    The committee addresses Regulation 1100/2007 on eel, with the Commission detailing the species’ critical status, current measures and illegal glass eel trade, while MEPs raise governance of national plans, socio‑economic impacts, uneven closures, predators and calls for zero‑catch, followed by Commission replies on advisory structures, plan updates and stronger control tools. The rapporteur closes by outlining Parliament’s intention to keep political pressure on Member States and the Commission for a holistic eel recovery strategy.

    In this chapter

    1. Introduction to eel regulation item: state of European eelCarmen Crespo Díaz
    2. Commission: current eel measures, uneven progress and IUU glass eel trade
    3. First MEP reactions: governance of eel plans and socio‑economic impactsBert-Jan Ruissen

    Watch the moment

  3. GMT+2

    IUU fishing in Mediterranean: enforcement, EFCA role and MEP concerns

    From the chair’s opening through Commission briefings and MEP interventions, the committee examines cross‑border IUU fishing in the Mediterranean, focusing on GFCM tools, EFCA operations, third‑country fleets (Tunisia, Turkey and others), import controls and the need for stronger EU‑level enforcement. The Commission then responds on Tunisia, trade leverage, Turkey’s obligations and planned use of the EU IUU Regulation and EFCA resources.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening: focus on cross‑border IUU in MediterraneanCarmen Crespo Díaz
    2. Commission (DG MARE): regional tools against IUU in Med
    3. Commission: EFCA role, joint inspections and EU IUU regulationCarmen Crespo Díaz

    Watch the moment

  4. GMT+2

    MEP legal concerns, Commission reply and session closure

    An MEP questions the legal basis and proportionality of VMS monitoring obligations for small-scale vessels, the Commission defends the targeted porpoise monitoring act and details Bluefin TAC increases and FTA sensitivities, and the Chair formally closes the delegated acts point and the morning sitting.

    In this chapter

    1. VMS delegated act: legal concerns and porpoise monitoringPaulo do Nascimento Cabral
    2. Bluefin tuna quotas, Indonesia FTA sensitivity and session closurePaulo do Nascimento Cabral

    Watch the moment

  5. GMT+2

    Commission delegated acts on porpoise and tuna

    DG MARE presents delegated acts on Baltic porpoise static-net restrictions and on Bluefin tuna alignment with ICCAT rules, with MEPs raising initial questions on bycatch control and the sensitivity of tuna in EU–Indonesia FTA negotiations.

    Watch the moment

  6. GMT+2

    Crisis support, EMFAF and future EU fisheries funding

    Commission and MEPs debate emergency tools for the fuel price crisis and limits of EMFAF and state aid, before a broader political clash on the post‑2027 funding architecture, including NRPPs, the size and design of a dedicated fisheries fund, ring‑fencing, conditionality and the role of Global Europe and the Ocean Pact in financing both internal and external fisheries policy, SFPAs and ocean governance.

    In this chapter

    1. Fuel price crisis in fisheries: MEP demands and Commission replyIsabelle Le Callennec
    2. Future fisheries funding in new MFF/NRPP frameworkAndré Franqueira Rodrigues
    3. Global Europe instrument: external fisheries dimensionPaulo do Nascimento Cabral

    Watch the moment

  7. GMT+2

    Opening, agenda and fisheries partnership votes

    Chair opens the PECH meeting, adopts the agenda and conducts consent votes on the Fisheries Partnership Protocol with São Tomé and Príncipe and the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement with the Cook Islands, then the committee turns to impact reports on the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive and the Baltic Sea multiannual plan with detailed amendment and final votes.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening of meeting and fisheries partnership votes
    2. Impact reports on Maritime Spatial Planning and Baltic Sea plan

    Watch the moment

  8. GMT+1

    Horizontal performance rules and external CFP funding

    The Commission and MEPs debate the new performance regulation for EU funds, including climate and social targets, DNHS and indicators, raising concerns about legal complexity and value‑for‑money assessment, before turning to the Global Europe external instrument and the external dimension of the CFP, where MEPs seek clarity on funding levels, the promised €1 billion for oceans and the treatment of SFPAs and RFMOs under the EU budget headings.

    In this chapter

    1. Performance regulation: tracking, DNHS and concerns on indicatorsIsabelle Le Callennec
    2. Global Europe instrument and external dimension of CFP, including SFPAsPaulo do Nascimento Cabral

    Watch the moment

  9. GMT+1

    NRPF opinion (point 11): cross‑party opposition and search for alternatives

    On the Parliament’s opinion to the NRPF, the rapporteur and shadows across groups denounce the absence of a legal fisheries minimum, major national cuts and the merger of CFP funding into the NRPF, warning of a de facto end to the common policy, while the Commission reiterates its interpretation of the €2 billion minimum and governance safeguards and MEPs announce work on alternative architectures to restore dedicated CFP financing.

    In this chapter

    1. NRPF opinion (point 11): rapporteur Rodrigues and shadows deepen criticismPaulo do Nascimento Cabral
    2. Second Commission response and political call for alternatives on NRPFAndré Franqueira Rodrigues

    Watch the moment

  10. GMT+1

    NRPF regulation: Commission proposal and first committee reactions

    The Commission presents the new National and Regional Partnership Fund architecture and fisheries envelope within the post‑2028 MFF, then rapporteur and shadows from all main groups react, warning about cuts to CFP financing, loss of sectoral rules, risks of renationalisation and insufficient safeguards for small‑scale fishers, outermost regions, decarbonisation and biodiversity, before the Commission defends the NRPP model, €2 billion minimum and DNHS application.

    In this chapter

    1. Commission: introduction of NRPF maritime support regulation (point 10)Paulo do Nascimento Cabral
    2. Rapporteur and shadows: first reactions to NRPF and CFP financingPaulo do Nascimento Cabral
    3. Broader committee debate: 67% cuts, renationalisation and outermost regionsPaulo do Nascimento Cabral
    4. Commission reply on NRPP model, €2 billion minimum and DNHSPaulo do Nascimento Cabral

    Watch the moment

  11. GMT+1

    Cook Islands SFPA protocol: presentation and closing

    The committee examines the 2025–2032 sustainable fisheries partnership protocol with the Cook Islands, with the rapporteur and shadows detailing financial terms, fishing opportunities, sustainability conditions and geopolitical context, followed by a critical intervention on broader blue‑economy interests, a brief Commission endorsement and the formal closure of the file with procedural deadlines.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening of meeting and Cook Islands protocol itemPaulo do Nascimento Cabral
    2. Rapporteur: content and rationale of Cook Islands SFPAPaulo do Nascimento Cabral
    3. EPP and S&D shadows: support and geopolitical stakesPaulo do Nascimento Cabral
    4. Critical view on wider economic interests and closure of Cook Islands filePaulo do Nascimento Cabral

    Watch the moment

  12. GMT+1

    Fuel price emergency for fishers and shift to in camera SFPAs

    MEPs press the Commission for concrete instruments to address soaring fuel prices affecting the EU fleet before the chair closes the public session and moves the committee in camera for confidential updates on SFPA negotiations with Morocco and Mauritania.

    In this chapter

    1. Fuel price crisis and call for emergency support to fishersIsabelle Le Callennec
    2. Transition to in camera discussion on SFPAs Morocco and Mauritania

    Watch the moment

  13. GMT+1

    Seychelles SFPA mission: findings, model value and Commission stance

    The rapporteur and delegation members report on the mission to Seychelles, underscoring the SFPA’s economic, strategic and RFMO importance, local political sensitivities and transparency gaps, while the Commission confirms alignment of sectoral support with Seychellois priorities and commits to enhanced transparency and beneficial ownership disclosure in the renewed protocol.

    In this chapter

    1. Mission to Seychelles: delegation report and political contextCarmen Crespo Díaz
    2. Other delegation members: economic benefits and exemplary SFPA modelFrancisco José Millán Mon
    3. Commission on Seychelles SFPA and future transparency standards

    Watch the moment

  14. GMT+1

    IFAC and Commission: responses and next steps on cormorant management

    IFAC experts detail financing needs, coordination structures, timing, cost allocation and the limited role of Annex II listing, while the Commission sets out its planned actions on derogation guidance, AEWA options, monitoring and a 2026–2027 review; further exchanges address population figures, ecological side‑effects, AEWA prioritisation and IFAC’s request for Parliament’s endorsement of a modest EU coordination mechanism.

    In this chapter

    1. Experts’ initial replies: financing, coordination and predator scope
    2. Experts on timing, costs and Annex II optionCarmen Crespo Díaz
    3. Commission (DG MARE and Environment): response on cormorant conflictsCarmen Crespo Díaz

    Watch the moment

  15. GMT+1

    MEPs’ positions on EU cormorant plan and legal status

    Political groups outline support and concerns regarding the proposed cormorant plan, questioning EMFAF funding, links to broader predator control, concrete EU tools to protect farmers and fishers, and calling variously for listing cormorants as huntable species, clarifying Article 9 derogations, robust science, cost estimates and possible Annex II changes.

    In this chapter

    1. EPP and S&D coordinators: questions on budget source and support toolsIsabelle Le Callennec
    2. Croatian MEP: call to list cormorant as huntable speciesStephen Nikola Bartulica
    3. Renew and Greens/Left: questions on Article 9, science and costsEmma Ytterell
    4. Further MEP interventions: legal basis, Annex II and management optionsFrancisco José Millán Mon

    Watch the moment

  16. GMT+1

    Cormorant management item: mandate and IFAC framework

    The chair introduces the cormorant management agenda point, recalls previous Parliament work and IFAC’s mandate, and IFAC presents data on population growth, legal context, socio‑economic impacts and its proposal for an EU‑level adaptive management plan with dedicated coordination funding.

    In this chapter

    1. Introduction to cormorant management item and IFAC guestsCarmen Crespo Díaz
    2. IFAC presentation: impacts and need for EU-level cormorant planCarmen Crespo Díaz

    Watch the moment

  17. GMT+1

    Opening, vice‑chair election and 2027 budget votes

    The Fisheries Committee opens its meeting, adopts the agenda with a political warning on the fuel‑price crisis, elects a new first vice‑chair from the EPP quota, and votes on pilot projects and preparatory actions for the 2027 budget.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening, agenda adoption and fuel price warningCarmen Crespo Díaz
    2. Election of first vice-chair (EPP quota)Carmen Crespo Díaz
    3. Vote on pilot projects and preparatory actions, budget 2027Carmen Crespo Díaz

    Watch the moment

  18. GMT+1

    MEPs: feasibility concerns and calls for revision of control regulation

    EPP and other MEPs highlight widespread sector protests, argue the new control rules and CATCH system are disproportionate and unworkable for small‑scale fleets and trade, criticise funding cuts and burdensome data and notification requirements, and urge the Commission to simplify implementation or propose an omnibus‑style targeted revision.

    In this chapter

    1. EPP (Mato): criticism of control regulation feasibility
    2. González Casares: Spain’s protests, small‑scale fleet and CATCH system
    3. MEP Ruissen: call for omnibus revision of control regulationBert-Jan Ruissen

    Watch the moment

  19. GMT+1

    Commission: phased implementation of revised fisheries control regulation

    The Chair opens the agenda item on the staged entry into force of the revised fisheries control regulation and the Commission details the 2023 reform, the 2024–2029 phase‑in calendar for key obligations (VMS, CCTV, small‑scale vessels, weighing, engine power and traceability), and ongoing delegated and implementing acts with Member State consultations.

    Watch the moment

  20. GMT+1

    Commission and expert replies: management, multi‑use and feeds

    The Commission outlines EU strategies, CFP evaluation and offshore wind–aquaculture pilots, while Huntington addresses fuel‑efficient gear, limits of stock rebuilding for self‑sufficiency, support for low‑trophic aquaculture and spatial mapping; both then respond to follow‑up on fishmeal and fish oil, explaining shifts in aquafeed ingredients and announcing an EU study on feed supply and demand.

    In this chapter

    1. Commission (De La Cruz): EU strategies and offshore wind–aquaculture
    2. Expert replies: management, sovereignty, mapping and climate change
    3. Follow‑up on fishmeal, fish oil and sustainable feeds

    Watch the moment

  21. GMT+1

    MEPs’ questions on self‑sufficiency, pelagics and aquaculture model

    MEPs Ruissen, Levin and others question the feasibility and instruments to boost EU self‑sufficiency, the role of stock management and pelagic uses, offshore multi‑use with wind farms, low‑trophic aquaculture, trade standards, food sovereignty, and the need for EU‑wide mapping of fisheries and aquaculture to reduce import dependence and ensure a level playing field.

    In this chapter

    1. MEP Ruissen: questions on tech policy and offshore multi‑useBert-Jan Ruissen
    2. MEP Levin: stock management, pelagics and low‑trophic aquaculture
    3. Other MEP interventions: level playing field, food sovereignty, mapping

    Watch the moment

  22. GMT+1

    Study on seafood imports and EU self‑sufficiency: presentation

    The Chair opens the agenda item and expert Tim Huntington presents key findings on EU seafood self‑sufficiency trends, cost competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquaculture, case studies on Turkish seabass/seabream and Chilean mussels, innovation needs in offshore bivalves and RAS, financing gaps, and eight policy recommendations on support, technology, aquaculture expansion, trade consistency and sustainability labelling.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening of meeting: study on seafood imports
    2. EU seafood self-sufficiency trends and import dependence
    3. Cost competitiveness of EU capture fisheries and aquaculture

    Watch the moment

  23. GMT+1

    São Tomé fisheries protocol: presentation, political backing and Q&A

    The Chair, rapporteur and shadows outline the strategic, developmental and fisheries-management aspects of the 2025–2029 Fisheries Partnership Protocol with São Tomé and Príncipe, the Commission details quotas, sectoral support and implementation issues, and MEPs question training and use of opportunities before the rapporteur reaffirms support and the Chair sets the amendment deadline and closes the sitting.

    In this chapter

    1. São Tomé and Príncipe Fisheries Partnership Protocol: Chair and rapporteur
    2. São Tomé protocol: political support from shadows
    3. São Tomé protocol: Commission detail, Q&A and close

    Watch the moment

  24. GMT+1

    Fisheries and aquaculture statistics regulation: debate and amendments

    The rapporteur and shadows present positions on the draft regulation to consolidate and modernise EU fisheries and aquaculture statistics, addressing data quality, burden reduction, socio‑economic indicators, confidentiality and delegated acts, followed by the rapporteur’s explanation of his amendment package and confirmation of the amendment deadline.

    In this chapter

    1. Fisheries and aquaculture statistics regulation: rapporteur and stakeholders
    2. Statistics regulation: rapporteur’s response and amendment structure

    Watch the moment

  25. GMT+1

    Opening and votes on RFMO, ocean diplomacy and budget

    The Chair opens the Fisheries Committee meeting with information on storm damage and EU aid mechanisms, then members hold successive voting blocks on implementing RFMO measures into EU law, adopting the report on oceanic diplomacy for EU competitiveness, and approving the committee opinion on the interim financial report, including final roll‑call votes and mandates for negotiations.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening of meeting: storm damage and EU aid
    2. RFMO measures into EU law: full amendment vote and mandate
    3. Report “Oceanic diplomacy for EU competitiveness”: adoption
    4. Opinion on interim financial report: compromises and final vote

    Watch the moment

Schedule

  1. Replay

    Part 1Part 2

  2. Replay

    Watch the replay

  3. Replay

    Watch the replay

  4. Replay

    Watch the replay

  5. Replay

    Watch the replay

  6. Replay

    Part 1Part 2

  7. Replay

    Watch the replay

  8. Replay

    Part 1Part 2

  9. Replay

    Part 1Part 2

  10. Replay

    Part 1Part 2

  11. Replay

    Part 1Part 2

  12. Replay

    Part 1Part 2

  13. Upcoming
    Committee on Fisheries - Extraordinary meeting
  14. Upcoming
    Committee on Fisheries - Ordinary meeting
  15. Upcoming
    Committee on Fisheries - Ordinary meeting

Who spoke at the committee

  • Francisco José Millán Mon 14 sittings
  • Isabelle Le Callennec 14 sittings
  • Isabella Lövin 13 sittings
  • Luke Ming Flanagan 12 sittings
  • Bert-Jan Ruissen 11 sittings
  • Eric Sargiacomo 11 sittings
  • Paulo do Nascimento Cabral 10 sittings
  • Carmen Crespo Díaz 9 sittings
  • France Jamet 9 sittings
  • Ana Miranda Paz 8 sittings
  • André Franqueira Rodrigues 8 sittings
  • Sakis Arnaoutoglou 8 sittings
  • Giuseppe Lupo 7 sittings
  • Stephen Nikola Bartulica 7 sittings
  • Emma Ytterell 6 sittings
  • Thomas Bajada 6 sittings
  • Asger Christensen 5 sittings
  • Nora Junco García 5 sittings
  • Siegbert Frank Droese 5 sittings
  • Ton Diepeveen 5 sittings
  • Nicolás González Casares 4 sittings
  • Sander Smit 4 sittings
  • Stéphanie Yon-Courtin 4 sittings
  • Željana Zovko 4 sittings
  • Fredis Beleris 3 sittings
  • Niclas Herbst 3 sittings
  • Sofie Eriksson 3 sittings
  • Cristina Pita 2 sittings
  • Gabriel Mato 2 sittings
  • Addy Risseeuw 1 sitting

Where these transcripts come from

European Parliament broadcasts the sittings of the Committee on Fisheries (PECH). Polyfact shows each one live, keeps it as a replay with its transcript and links its key moments to the second they were said.

35 sittings on Polyfact since 20 May 2025

Polyfact records and transcribes the sittings and committee hearings of European Union's parliaments. A speaker is named only once their identity is confirmed, by the official record or by a person; automatic guesses are left out.

Every committee

Questions

How can I watch the Committee on Fisheries (PECH) live?

On Polyfact, free and without an account: a sitting on air is marked live in the schedule above, and each sitting stays available as a replay.

Is it free?

Yes. Watching the sittings on Polyfact is free and needs no account. A Polyfact subscription, which you can try for free, adds the full transcripts as soon as they are ready, search across every sitting and alerts on your topics.

Where is the transcript of the Committee on Fisheries (PECH)?

On each sitting's page on Polyfact, speaker by speaker, with its key moments one click from the second they were said. The search on this page covers the sittings held more than two weeks ago.

Follow every committee without searching

With a Polyfact plan you read every sitting as soon as it is transcribed, ask questions to the video assistant and get an alert as soon as your topics come up.

14-day free trial. A card is required, nothing is charged for 14 days, and you can cancel anytime.

Updated