European Parliament

How to watch the Committee on Fisheries (PECH)

Every sitting is free to watch on Polyfact, live and on replay, no account needed.

Latest updates

What is said in the sittings, update by update, the latest first. Each update opens the video at the second it was said.

  1. GMT+2

    Committee on Fisheries Ordinary meeting

    Regionalisation studies: Western Waters, Mediterranean, Baltic and CFP

    Experts and EU institutions present regionalisation case studies for Western Waters, the Mediterranean and the Baltic Sea, detailing governance frameworks, delegated acts, recovery plans and science–policy interfaces. The segment concludes with a broader debate on how CFP regionalisation operates in practice, including socio-economic integration, data and enforcement gaps, and cooperation with non‑EU countries.

    In this chapter

    1. Western Waters studies: mandate, cases, recommendationsPaulo do Nascimento Cabral
    2. Mediterranean cross-border management: GFCM tools and FRAsPaulo do Nascimento Cabral
    3. Baltic Sea regionalisation study: findings and recommendationsPaulo do Nascimento Cabral
    4. CFP regionalisation and socio‑economic dimensionsIsabelle Le Callennec

    Watch the moment

  2. GMT+2

    Committee on Fisheries Ordinary meeting

    2025 EU fisheries budget opinion: priorities and political positions

    The committee opens work on its 2025 EU budget opinion as the rapporteur presents key demands on EMFAF levels, accessibility and post‑2028 architecture, followed by political groups setting their priorities on fleet support, conditionalities, competitiveness, import reciprocity, blue economy sustainability and simplification of funding and data collection.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening of 2025 EU budget opinion and rapporteur’s prioritiesJessica Polfjärd
    2. Political groups: fisheries budget priorities and conditionalitiesJessica Polfjärd

    Watch the moment

  3. GMT+2

    Committee on Fisheries Ordinary meeting

    CATCH import control system: mandate, issues, adjustments

    The committee examines the EU’s mandatory CATCH system against IUU fishing, with the Commission outlining its legal basis, objectives, initial performance and planned upgrades, while MEPs highlight administrative burdens, technical gaps and third‑country difficulties, prompting the Commission to detail upcoming improvements and a final extension of transition flexibilities.

    In this chapter

    1. CATCH implementation: Commission mandate and rolloutPaulo do Nascimento Cabral
    2. MEPs: CATCH implementation burdens and technical gapsIsabelle Le Callennec
    3. Commission: planned CATCH upgrades and extended flexibilitiesJessica Polfjärd

    Watch the moment

  4. GMT+2

    Committee on Fisheries Ordinary meeting

    Irish Council Presidency: fisheries files and closure

    The Chair and Minister Heydon wrap up the item on the Irish Presidency, outlining priorities on the MFF, EMFAF, POSEI Fisheries, CFP simplification (including a possible omnibus), TACs and landing obligation derogations, state aid for MPAs, and safety and social aspects before formally closing the agenda point and suspending for a photo.

    Watch the moment

  5. GMT+2

    Committee on Fisheries Ordinary meeting

    MEPs to Presidency: fisheries budget and CFP reform

    MEPs from several groups press the Irish Presidency on securing a higher fisheries budget in the next MFF, protecting EMFAF/POSEI and related instruments, and delivering a clear path to reform and simplify the CFP while addressing regional pressures, landing obligation burdens and socio‑economic challenges for coastal communities.

    In this chapter

    1. MEPs: Fisheries budget, CFP reform and simplificationFrancisco José Millán Mon
    2. Regional challenges, landing obligation and coastal communitiesSakis Arnaoutoglou

    Watch the moment

  6. GMT+2

    Committee on Fisheries Ordinary meeting

    Irish Council Presidency: fisheries mandate and MEP scrutiny

    Irish Minister Martin Heydon presents the Irish Council Presidency’s fisheries mandate (CFP support, EMFAF revision, multiannual plans, RFMOs, SFPAs, Ocean Pact and coastal communities), followed by political group coordinators’ questions on MFF fisheries funding, CFP reform, external dimension and regional challenges, and Heydon’s replies clarifying Presidency priorities, budget constraints, science-based TACs and his role in Council negotiations.

    In this chapter

    1. Irish Council Presidency: fisheries priorities and work programmePaulo do Nascimento Cabral
    2. Political groups: priorities and questions to Irish PresidencyIsabelle Le Callennec
    3. Irish Presidency: fisheries priorities and Council roleMartin Heydon

    Watch the moment

  7. GMT+2

    Committee on Fisheries Extraordinary meeting

    EPP demands and Commission: revising MAP framework

    EPP MEPs press for revising Article 4(3) of the Western Mediterranean plan to move beyond a “most vulnerable stock” mechanism towards a multi-species, socio-economic model with stabilised effort and clearer multiannual rules, and urge the Commission to table legislative changes by end-2026. The Commission defends the existing effort-based, science-driven framework and its current flexibilities, explains legal and technical limits compared to quota regimes, highlights support tools and anti-IUU measures, and situates any future MAP revisions within the broader CFP and MedFish4Ever review process.

    In this chapter

    1. EPP Le Callennec & Millán Mon: revise Article 4(3) and stabilise effortCarmen Crespo Díaz
    2. Commission Berg: current MAP framework and limits to flexibility

    Watch the moment

  8. GMT+2

    Committee on Fisheries Extraordinary meeting

    Political groups: conditions for supporting Mediterranean fishers

    MEPs from Patriots for Europe, ECR, Renew and the Greens outline contrasting narratives on the causes of the crisis in Mediterranean fisheries, the weight of third-country fleets, and the pace of environmental ambition, while converging on the need to protect small-scale fishers and ensure socio-economic viability. Positions range from calls for greater flexibility and mixed-fisheries management to firm defence of the current MAP scope and science-based rebuilding of overfished stocks, rejecting its use to reopen broader CFP reforms.

    In this chapter

    1. Patriotes pour l’Europe Jamet: support for artisanal fishersFrance Jamet
    2. ECR Junco García: three-pillar sustainability and mixed fisheriesNora Junco García
    3. Renew Wiesner: environmental pillar and scientific adviceEmma Ytterell
    4. Greens Lövin (for Camara): defend MAP scope and ambitionCarmen Crespo Díaz

    Watch the moment

  9. GMT+2

    Committee on Fisheries Extraordinary meeting

    Rapporteur and S&D shadow: objectives for MAP revision

    The rapporteur presents the mandate, timeline and aims of revising the Western Mediterranean multiannual plan, emphasising balance between environmental, economic and social pillars and reliance on updated science, followed by the S&D shadow’s call to refocus the text on stock sustainability, long-term management and stronger action against IUU and unsustainable imports. This segment sets out the main strategic choices, national sensitivities and upcoming amendment work on the file.

    In this chapter

    1. Rapporteur: revision of Western Mediterranean multiannual planCarmen Crespo Díaz
    2. S&D shadow Sargiacomo: sustainability focus and member states' balanceEric Sargiacomo

    Watch the moment

  10. GMT+2

    Committee on Fisheries Extraordinary meeting

    Opening of meeting and adoption of opinions

    The Chair opens the extraordinary Fisheries Committee meeting, confirms the agenda and timing before plenary, then conducts voting on the report on socioeconomic and environmental standards for aquatic food products and on the opinion for the "Global Europe" dossier, including final roll-call results.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening of extraordinary meeting and agenda approvalCarmen Crespo Díaz
    2. Voting: Socioeconomic and environmental standards reportCarmen Crespo Díaz
    3. Voting: Opinion on "Global Europe" dossierCarmen Crespo Díaz

    Watch the moment

  11. GMT+2

    Committee on Fisheries Ordinary meeting

    Indian Ocean Tuna Commission mission and meeting closure

    The committee debriefs its mission to the IOTC, with reports on new quota‑based management for key tuna species, EU quota shares and conservation measures, and highlighting the diplomatic value of parliamentary presence in international ocean governance and BBNJ processes. The acting Chair then closes the PECH meeting, thanking participants and announcing the dates of the next sessions.

    In this chapter

    1. IOTC mission debrief: tuna stocks, EU quotas and ocean diplomacyŽeljana Zovko
    2. Closure of PECH meeting and next datesPaulo do Nascimento Cabral

    Watch the moment

  12. GMT+2

    Committee on Fisheries Ordinary meeting

    Post‑2028 EU fisheries fund: parliamentary debate

    Rapporteur Herbst presents his proposal to re-establish a dedicated EMFAF‑type fund for 2028‑2034 centred on CFP objectives, fleet modernisation, generational renewal and crisis response, rather than a fully integrated NRPP architecture. Shadows and DG MARE then debate the appropriate budget level, state aid and support intensities, DNSH and other horizontal principles, ring‑fencing for fisheries, POSEI‑type schemes for outermost regions and the balance between EU‑level discipline and national flexibility, before Herbst calls for parliamentary unity ahead of MFF talks.

    In this chapter

    1. Post‑2028 fisheries fund proposal: rapporteur Herbst re-centres on CFPNiclas Herbst
    2. Shadows and Members: budget level, DNSH, POSEI-Pescas and small-scale prioritiesNicolás González Casares
    3. DG MARE: defence of NRPP model, 2bn ring-fence and DNSHPaulo do Nascimento Cabral
    4. Rapporteur Herbst: call for parliamentary unity on fisheries fundingNiclas Herbst

    Watch the moment

  13. GMT+2

    Committee on Fisheries Ordinary meeting

    West Med demersal plan: implementation review and next steps

    The rapporteur-Chair and shadows assess the 2019 West Med multiannual demersal plan, acknowledging biological improvements but highlighting severe socio‑economic impacts such as reduced fishing days, ageing fleets and loss of vessels, and propose concrete regulatory changes to introduce more flexible, socio‑economic effort management. DG MARE outlines the procedure for reviewing the plan, announcing a call for evidence to gather input from fleets, scientists, NGOs and regional authorities before deciding on amendments ahead of future TAC and quota decisions.

    In this chapter

    1. Launch of debate on West Med demersal multiannual plan
    2. Shadows and Members: West Med: science gains vs socio-economic crisisEric Sargiacomo
    3. DG MARE: procedure for West Med plan review

    Watch the moment

  14. GMT+2

    Committee on Fisheries Ordinary meeting

    CFP future: MEP positions and Commission reply

    Coordinators and Members from across groups set out diverging views on whether to revise or merely adjust the CFP, criticising the landing obligation, budget cuts, capacity rules, red tape and socio‑economic failures, while others warn against deregulation and call for stronger support to small‑scale, low‑impact fisheries and crisis regions. The Chair synthesises priorities around fleet viability, generational renewal and food security, and Commissioner Kadis responds on landing obligation reform, regional measures (notably Baltic and Mediterranean), control, IUU, small‑scale fishers and how broader initiatives like the Ocean Act and maritime spatial planning can better integrate fisheries.

    In this chapter

    1. Coordinators EPP & S&D: revision vs evolution of the CFPIsabelle Le Callennec
    2. Other coordinators: landing obligation, budget cuts and regional crisesStephen Nikola Bartulica
    3. Left and Greens/Nordic left: warnings against deregulation and call for small-scale support

    Watch the moment

  15. GMT+2

    Committee on Fisheries Ordinary meeting

    Opening: agenda, Ocean Eye and CFP evaluation

    The Chair opens the afternoon PECH meeting, adjusts the agenda and introduces Commissioner Kadis, who presents the new Ocean Eye ocean observation initiative and the just-published evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy, including stock, fleet and market performance. The Commissioner frames the evaluation as a diagnostic feeding into a 2040 vision, future legislative choices and a simplification agenda on multiannual plans, EMFAF and WTO‑compatible subsidies.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening of afternoon PECH meeting and agenda change
    2. Commissioner: Ocean Eye initiative for ocean observationCostas Kadis
    3. Commissioner: CFP evaluation: state of stocks, fleets and marketsCostas Kadis
    4. Commissioner: CFP diagnosis, Vision 2040 and simplification agendaCostas Kadis

    Watch the moment

  16. GMT+2

    Committee on Fisheries Ordinary meeting

    MEP questions, expert replies and Commission position on IUU tools

    Two MEP Q&A rounds on EU import dependence, IUU carding, flags of convenience, CATCH, sanctions and enforcement gaps, followed by detailed replies from the expert panel and the Commission on using EU market power, retailer responsibility, ownership transparency, CATCH implementation, IUU dialogues and the forthcoming EU forced labour regulation, concluding with calls for stronger Member State action and consumer awareness.

    In this chapter

    1. MEP Q&A round I: dependency on imports, IUU carding and red/yellow cardsPaulo do Nascimento Cabral
    2. MEP Q&A round II: flags of convenience, CATCH system and Antarctic fisheriesIsabella Lövin
    3. Experts’ replies: shift pressure to retailers, strengthen controls and ownership transparencyIsabelle Le Callennec
    4. Commission responses: IUU dialogues, CATCH ‘jewel’ and forced labour regulationIsabelle Le Callennec

    Watch the moment

  17. GMT+2

    Committee on Fisheries Ordinary meeting

    Public hearing: scope and expert evidence on fisheries crime

    Launch of the public hearing on fisheries‑related crimes and protection of EU fishers, then expert presentations from NGOs, investigative media, INTERPOL and the Portuguese Navy on IUU fishing, forced labour, opaque ownership, flags of convenience, piracy and the limits of current EU and international enforcement tools, with concrete cases and recommended regulatory responses.

    In this chapter

    1. Launch of public hearing: framing IUU fishing problemIsabelle Le Callennec
    2. Outlaw Ocean Project: aquaculture, fishmeal and forced labour
    3. EJF: IUU fishing, forced labour and transparency toolsStéphanie Yon-Courtin

    Watch the moment

  18. GMT+2

    Committee on Fisheries Ordinary meeting

    Opening of meeting and fisheries votes

    Procedural opening of the Fisheries Committee sitting, adoption of the agenda and minutes, announcement of an extra July session, followed by two roll‑call votes on the GFCM Mediterranean regulation amendment and the delegated act on Baltic porpoise by‑catches, with brief political justification by the rapporteur.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening of meeting, agenda and extra July sessionNicolás González Casares
    2. Votes: GFCM Mediterranean regulation and Baltic porpoiseŽeljana Zovko

    Watch the moment

  19. GMT+2

    Committee on Fisheries Ordinary meeting

    MEPs Rodríguez and Miranda: defence of dedicated FLAG and CLLD funding

    Rodríguez and Miranda present Portuguese and Galician/Spanish experiences with FLAGs, argue for a ring‑fenced and visible MFF allocation for fisheries CLLD, and stress continuity of the fisheries‑specific local development model, community participation and recognition of outermost regions against shifting national priorities.

    In this chapter

    1. MEP Rodríguez: national examples and need for ring‑fenced FLAG funding
    2. MEP Miranda: Galician FLAGS and CLLD priorities

    Watch the moment

  20. GMT+2

    Committee on Fisheries Ordinary meeting

    Commission response and experts’ clarifications on new funding model

    The Commission defends the new MFF architecture as flexible and CFP‑aligned, pointing to ring‑fenced and additional envelopes and other EU instruments, while the experts clarify key structural changes from EMFAF, possible legalisation of DNSH guidance, and the limited impact of higher ring‑fencing for data and control on operators.

    In this chapter

    1. Commission: defence of MFF architecture and funding opportunities
    2. Experts’ replies: key structural differences, DNSH legalisation and data funding

    Watch the moment

  21. GMT+2

    Committee on Fisheries Ordinary meeting

    MEPs’ reactions: funding level, governance and DNSH

    Political group coordinators and MEPs challenge the reduced and less visible fisheries envelope, risks of dilution within NRPs, legal design flaws and DNSH uncertainty, social and food-sovereignty gaps, and unequal treatment compared with agriculture, while advocating a stronger or dedicated fisheries fund and clearer integration of the Ocean Pact/Act and decarbonisation needs.

    In this chapter

    1. Coordinators: budget demands, indicators, DNSH and outermost regions
    2. MEPs: loss of visibility, risk of dilution and need for dedicated fund
    3. MEPs: legal design issues, DNSH guidance, and Ocean Pact funding
    4. MEPs: social impact, food sovereignty and comparative treatment with agriculture

    Watch the moment

  22. GMT+2

    Committee on Fisheries Ordinary meeting

    Opening and expert study on MFF–CFP architecture

    The chair opens the meeting and the experts present their study on the Commission’s 2028–2034 MFF proposal, detailing implications for the CFP across the European Ocean Pact, the European Competitiveness Fund, the NRP fund, the EU facility, performance and conditions regulations, and the application of the DNSH principle.

    In this chapter

    1. Chair: opening and study mandate on MFF
    2. Experts: objectives and findings on European Ocean Pact
    3. Experts: European Competitiveness Fund – risks and safeguards

    Watch the moment

  23. GMT+2

    Committee on Fisheries Ordinary meeting

    Next MFF performance regulation: fisheries implications

    The committee turns to its opinion on the horizontal performance regulation for the next MFF, with rapporteur, shadows, the Commission and co‑rapporteur debating the application of DNSH, climate and gender criteria to fisheries, concerns over competitiveness and administrative burden, and the role of delegated acts, before the rapporteur closes the discussion and adjourns the sitting.

    In this chapter

    1. Transition to performance regulation opinion: rapporteur’s prioritiesCarmen Crespo Díaz
    2. Debate on DNSH, competitiveness and tracking in performance frameworkEric Sargiacomo
    3. Commission and co-rapporteur on performance framework designCarmen Crespo Díaz

    Watch the moment

  24. GMT+2

    Committee on Fisheries Ordinary meeting

    Panel and Commission responses on simplification

    Stakeholder panellists answer MEPs by stressing urgent, practical fixes using existing tools, more structured dialogue and recognition of competitiveness gaps with third countries, while DG MARE outlines its multi‑year simplification agenda, stress‑tests and guidance on aquaculture administration, prompting criticism from MEPs about slow timelines and insufficient concrete legal changes.

    In this chapter

    1. Panel replies: need for real listening and urgent fixesJosé Basilio Otero Rodríguez
    2. DG MARE response on simplification agenda and aquacultureCarmen Crespo Díaz

    Watch the moment

  25. GMT+2

    Committee on Fisheries Ordinary meeting

    MEPs’ questions: bureaucracy, CFP reform, funding

    Group coordinators and other MEPs probe where implementation blockages lie between EU and national levels, how MFF and EMFAF revisions could genuinely reduce red tape, what to do about import dependence and stagnating EU aquaculture, and whether to pursue a targeted CFP simplification omnibus or a broader reform, with a particular focus on small-scale, crustacean and coastal sectors.

    In this chapter

    1. Coordinators’ questions: blockages, MFF and aquaculture dataCarmen Crespo Díaz
    2. Further MEP interventions: bureaucracy impacts, recognition and importsAna Miranda Paz
    3. MEPs press for fisheries omnibus and CFP reform scopeBert-Jan Ruissen

    Watch the moment

  26. GMT+2

    Committee on Fisheries Ordinary meeting

    Public hearing: sector diagnosis and simplification demands

    The chair launches the CFP-related public hearing on bureaucracy and competitiveness, followed by industry and small-scale representatives detailing structural weaknesses, regulatory overload and concrete simplification needs across capture fisheries and aquaculture, including criticism of the landing obligation, control rules, licensing and TAC procedures, and calls for an EU-level framework that better balances sustainability with socio‑economic viability.

    In this chapter

    1. Introduction to public hearing on bureaucracy and competitivenessCarmen Crespo Díaz
    2. Otero (Spanish cofradías): sector diagnosis and CFP critiqueJosé Basilio Otero Rodríguez
    3. Otero: regulatory overload, landing obligation and closuresJosé Basilio Otero Rodríguez

    Watch the moment

  27. GMT+2

    Committee on Fisheries Ordinary meeting

    Opening, agenda and fisheries votes

    The committee chair opens the meeting, organises internal matters and adopts the agenda before holding key votes on the regulation for European fisheries and aquaculture statistics and on incorporating RFMO measures into Union law, thereby closing the decision-making part of the session.

    In this chapter

    1. Opening of meeting, farewell and agenda adoptionCarmen Crespo Díaz
    2. Votes: fisheries statistics and RFMO implementationCarmen Crespo Díaz

    Watch the moment

Schedule

  1. Replay

    Part 1Part 2

  2. Replay

    Watch the replay

  3. Replay

    Watch the replay

  4. Replay

    Watch the replay

  5. Replay

    Watch the replay

  6. Replay

    Part 1Part 2

  7. Replay

    Watch the replay

  8. Replay

    Part 1Part 2

  9. Replay

    Part 1Part 2

  10. Replay

    Part 1Part 2

  11. Replay

    Part 1Part 2

  12. Replay

    Part 1Part 2

  13. Upcoming
    Committee on Fisheries - Extraordinary meeting
  14. Upcoming
    Committee on Fisheries - Ordinary meeting
  15. Upcoming
    Committee on Fisheries - Ordinary meeting

Who spoke at the committee

  • Francisco José Millán Mon 14 sittings
  • Isabelle Le Callennec 14 sittings
  • Isabella Lövin 13 sittings
  • Luke Ming Flanagan 12 sittings
  • Bert-Jan Ruissen 11 sittings
  • Eric Sargiacomo 11 sittings
  • Paulo do Nascimento Cabral 10 sittings
  • Carmen Crespo Díaz 9 sittings
  • France Jamet 9 sittings
  • Ana Miranda Paz 8 sittings
  • André Franqueira Rodrigues 8 sittings
  • Sakis Arnaoutoglou 8 sittings
  • Giuseppe Lupo 7 sittings
  • Stephen Nikola Bartulica 7 sittings
  • Emma Ytterell 6 sittings
  • Thomas Bajada 6 sittings
  • Asger Christensen 5 sittings
  • Nora Junco García 5 sittings
  • Siegbert Frank Droese 5 sittings
  • Ton Diepeveen 5 sittings
  • Nicolás González Casares 4 sittings
  • Sander Smit 4 sittings
  • Stéphanie Yon-Courtin 4 sittings
  • Željana Zovko 4 sittings
  • Fredis Beleris 3 sittings
  • Niclas Herbst 3 sittings
  • Sofie Eriksson 3 sittings
  • Cristina Pita 2 sittings
  • Gabriel Mato 2 sittings
  • Addy Risseeuw 1 sitting

Where these transcripts come from

European Parliament broadcasts the sittings of the Committee on Fisheries (PECH). Polyfact shows each one live, keeps it as a replay with its transcript and links its key moments to the second they were said.

35 sittings on Polyfact since 20 May 2025

Polyfact records and transcribes the sittings and committee hearings of European Union's parliaments. A speaker is named only once their identity is confirmed, by the official record or by a person; automatic guesses are left out.

Every committee

Questions

How can I watch the Committee on Fisheries (PECH) live?

On Polyfact, free and without an account: a sitting on air is marked live in the schedule above, and each sitting stays available as a replay.

Is it free?

Yes. Watching the sittings on Polyfact is free and needs no account. A Polyfact subscription, which you can try for free, adds the full transcripts as soon as they are ready, search across every sitting and alerts on your topics.

Where is the transcript of the Committee on Fisheries (PECH)?

On each sitting's page on Polyfact, speaker by speaker, with its key moments one click from the second they were said. The search on this page covers the sittings held more than two weeks ago.

Follow every committee without searching

With a Polyfact plan you read every sitting as soon as it is transcribed, ask questions to the video assistant and get an alert as soon as your topics come up.

14-day free trial. A card is required, nothing is charged for 14 days, and you can cancel anytime.

Updated