Strategic debate and timelines for enlargement
MEPs and Commissioner Kos discuss enlargement as a core security investment, the need for an enlargement summit and renewed high‑level political commitment, before moving to detailed questions on Serbia, Bosnia and wider Western Balkans dynamics, foreign influence and Turkey–Cyprus tensions. Kos provides indicative timelines for several candidate countries, explains Growth Plan implementation and financial implications of accessions, and calls for reforms in Serbia, resolution of bilateral disputes and changes to unanimity rules in enlargement and CFSP.
In this chapter
- Strategic debate on enlargement summit and member‑state commitmentPetras Auštrevičius
- Second Q&A: enlargement files and timelinesMatej Tonin